{"title":"«Ubehagets pedagogikk» – en inngang til kritisk refleksjon og inkluderende undervisning?","authors":"Åse Røthing","doi":"10.7577/fleks.3309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“Pedagogy of discomfort” was first introduced by Boler in 1999 as a teaching practice that invites educators and students to engage in critical inquiry regarding values and norms, and to examine constructed self-images and perceptions of others (1999, p. 177). The concept has later been further developed by Boler and Zembylas (2003) as a pedagogical framework to engage students and teachers with issues of difference, race and social justice by challenging their emotional comfort zones. This pedagogical approach is grounded in the assumption that discomforting emotions are important in challenging dominant beliefs, social habits and normative practices that sustain stereotypes and social injustice and in creating openings for empathy and transformation. (Zembylas & Papamichael, 2017, p. 3). This article explores how pedagogy of discomfort may contribute to critical reflections and inclusive education, by asking what educators may gain from dwelling with discomfort rather than trying to escape it. I argue that discomfort may function as an approach to critical reflections and new knowledge, and a resource for transformation, not as something to fear and avoid. However, the ideas of pedagogy of discomfort have raised concerns for what might happen when students are challenged and become uncomfortable in educational settings. One might argue that the concept of “classroom safety” could imply that educators first and foremost should offer comfort in classrooms. My main interest in this article is what educators may gain from engaging with discomfort as a resource for critical reflections and inclusive education.","PeriodicalId":179459,"journal":{"name":"FLEKS - Scandinavian Journal of Intercultural Theory and Practice","volume":"100 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FLEKS - Scandinavian Journal of Intercultural Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7577/fleks.3309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

“不适的教育学”最初是由Boler在1999年提出的,作为一种教学实践,它邀请教育者和学生参与关于价值观和规范的批判性探究,并检查构建的自我形象和他人的感知(1999,第177页)。后来,Boler和Zembylas(2003)进一步发展了这一概念,作为一种教学框架,通过挑战学生和教师的情感舒适区,让他们参与到差异、种族和社会正义等问题中来。这种教学方法基于这样一种假设,即不适情绪在挑战维持刻板印象和社会不公正的主流信仰、社会习惯和规范做法方面很重要,在为移情和转变创造机会方面也很重要。(Zembylas & papammichael, 2017,第3页)。本文探讨了不适教育学如何有助于批判性反思和包容性教育,通过询问教育者可以从不适中获得什么,而不是试图逃避它。我认为不适可以作为批判性反思和新知识的途径,以及变革的资源,而不是作为恐惧和避免的东西。然而,不适教学法的观点引起了人们的关注,即当学生在教育环境中受到挑战并变得不舒服时,可能会发生什么。有人可能会争辩说,“教室安全”的概念可能意味着教育者首先应该在教室里提供舒适。我对这篇文章的主要兴趣是教育工作者可以从将不适作为批判性反思和包容性教育的资源中获得什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
«Ubehagets pedagogikk» – en inngang til kritisk refleksjon og inkluderende undervisning?
“Pedagogy of discomfort” was first introduced by Boler in 1999 as a teaching practice that invites educators and students to engage in critical inquiry regarding values and norms, and to examine constructed self-images and perceptions of others (1999, p. 177). The concept has later been further developed by Boler and Zembylas (2003) as a pedagogical framework to engage students and teachers with issues of difference, race and social justice by challenging their emotional comfort zones. This pedagogical approach is grounded in the assumption that discomforting emotions are important in challenging dominant beliefs, social habits and normative practices that sustain stereotypes and social injustice and in creating openings for empathy and transformation. (Zembylas & Papamichael, 2017, p. 3). This article explores how pedagogy of discomfort may contribute to critical reflections and inclusive education, by asking what educators may gain from dwelling with discomfort rather than trying to escape it. I argue that discomfort may function as an approach to critical reflections and new knowledge, and a resource for transformation, not as something to fear and avoid. However, the ideas of pedagogy of discomfort have raised concerns for what might happen when students are challenged and become uncomfortable in educational settings. One might argue that the concept of “classroom safety” could imply that educators first and foremost should offer comfort in classrooms. My main interest in this article is what educators may gain from engaging with discomfort as a resource for critical reflections and inclusive education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hate speech in intercultural encounters Hate Speech in Online Polylogues An Analysis of Hate Speech among Armenian Facebook Users From Euphemism to Verbal Aggression in British and Armenian Cultures Chocolate, identity, and extreme speech online
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1