{"title":"约","authors":"J. Baker","doi":"10.1093/obo/9780195393361-0225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The writ of covenant lay to enforce agreements, but it came to be restricted by formality. This chapter is principally devoted to the evolution of the rule requiring a deed - a written document under seal - to evidence a covenant. There was no clear rule before 1321, and it was at first possible to wage law in covenant actions, or to refer them to a jury. From 1292, however, there are signs of a nascent principle, of uncertain scope, that a plaintiff might fail unless he had written evidence of the covenant in the form of a sealed deed. The reports are all of exceptions to this principle – which is not directly explained – until in 1321 it was clearly stated as a general rule of evidence. It was a rule which applied only in the royal courts and did not, therefore, import any narrow understanding of what a covenant was. And the deed did not preclude a plea of performance, since it was evidence only of the covenant, not of its breach.","PeriodicalId":197105,"journal":{"name":"Baker and Milsom Sources of English Legal History","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Covenant\",\"authors\":\"J. Baker\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/obo/9780195393361-0225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The writ of covenant lay to enforce agreements, but it came to be restricted by formality. This chapter is principally devoted to the evolution of the rule requiring a deed - a written document under seal - to evidence a covenant. There was no clear rule before 1321, and it was at first possible to wage law in covenant actions, or to refer them to a jury. From 1292, however, there are signs of a nascent principle, of uncertain scope, that a plaintiff might fail unless he had written evidence of the covenant in the form of a sealed deed. The reports are all of exceptions to this principle – which is not directly explained – until in 1321 it was clearly stated as a general rule of evidence. It was a rule which applied only in the royal courts and did not, therefore, import any narrow understanding of what a covenant was. And the deed did not preclude a plea of performance, since it was evidence only of the covenant, not of its breach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":197105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Baker and Milsom Sources of English Legal History\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Baker and Milsom Sources of English Legal History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780195393361-0225\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baker and Milsom Sources of English Legal History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780195393361-0225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The writ of covenant lay to enforce agreements, but it came to be restricted by formality. This chapter is principally devoted to the evolution of the rule requiring a deed - a written document under seal - to evidence a covenant. There was no clear rule before 1321, and it was at first possible to wage law in covenant actions, or to refer them to a jury. From 1292, however, there are signs of a nascent principle, of uncertain scope, that a plaintiff might fail unless he had written evidence of the covenant in the form of a sealed deed. The reports are all of exceptions to this principle – which is not directly explained – until in 1321 it was clearly stated as a general rule of evidence. It was a rule which applied only in the royal courts and did not, therefore, import any narrow understanding of what a covenant was. And the deed did not preclude a plea of performance, since it was evidence only of the covenant, not of its breach.