{"title":"论在陷门谓词上建立陷门函数的不可能性","authors":"Yael Gertner, T. Malkin, Omer Reingold","doi":"10.1109/SFCS.2001.959887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We prove that, somewhat surprisingly, there is no black-box reduction of (poly-to-one) trapdoor functions to trapdoor predicates (equivalently, to public-key encryption schemes). Our proof follows the methodology that was introduced by R. Impagliazzo and S. Rudich (1989), although we use a new, weaker model of separation.","PeriodicalId":378126,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 2001 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing","volume":"1938 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"109","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the impossibility of basing trapdoor functions on trapdoor predicates\",\"authors\":\"Yael Gertner, T. Malkin, Omer Reingold\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SFCS.2001.959887\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We prove that, somewhat surprisingly, there is no black-box reduction of (poly-to-one) trapdoor functions to trapdoor predicates (equivalently, to public-key encryption schemes). Our proof follows the methodology that was introduced by R. Impagliazzo and S. Rudich (1989), although we use a new, weaker model of separation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":378126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings 2001 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing\",\"volume\":\"1938 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"109\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings 2001 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SFCS.2001.959887\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 2001 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SFCS.2001.959887","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
On the impossibility of basing trapdoor functions on trapdoor predicates
We prove that, somewhat surprisingly, there is no black-box reduction of (poly-to-one) trapdoor functions to trapdoor predicates (equivalently, to public-key encryption schemes). Our proof follows the methodology that was introduced by R. Impagliazzo and S. Rudich (1989), although we use a new, weaker model of separation.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
