P. Jafarali, Lalitha Chattopadhyay, G. Prathap, S. Rajendran
{"title":"具有Timoshenko刚度和经典质量的混合梁单元误差分析","authors":"P. Jafarali, Lalitha Chattopadhyay, G. Prathap, S. Rajendran","doi":"10.1142/S1465876304002538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We review critically the performance of an ingeniously designed hybrid beam element that uses a stiffness matrix based on Timoshenko theory but retains the mass matrix from classical beam theory. This clever engineering trick gives seemingly very accurate results in thin beam situations. However, the physics of thick beam behavior is consequently misrepresented. A careful study reveals that cancellation of errors is responsible for the apparent \"accurate\" performance.","PeriodicalId":331001,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Comput. Eng. Sci.","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Error analysis of a hybrid beam element with Timoshenko stiffness and classical mass\",\"authors\":\"P. Jafarali, Lalitha Chattopadhyay, G. Prathap, S. Rajendran\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/S1465876304002538\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We review critically the performance of an ingeniously designed hybrid beam element that uses a stiffness matrix based on Timoshenko theory but retains the mass matrix from classical beam theory. This clever engineering trick gives seemingly very accurate results in thin beam situations. However, the physics of thick beam behavior is consequently misrepresented. A careful study reveals that cancellation of errors is responsible for the apparent \\\"accurate\\\" performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":331001,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Int. J. Comput. Eng. Sci.\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Int. J. Comput. Eng. Sci.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/S1465876304002538\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Comput. Eng. Sci.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S1465876304002538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Error analysis of a hybrid beam element with Timoshenko stiffness and classical mass
We review critically the performance of an ingeniously designed hybrid beam element that uses a stiffness matrix based on Timoshenko theory but retains the mass matrix from classical beam theory. This clever engineering trick gives seemingly very accurate results in thin beam situations. However, the physics of thick beam behavior is consequently misrepresented. A careful study reveals that cancellation of errors is responsible for the apparent "accurate" performance.