税收侵略性和欺诈会计会计行为

Suci Ardiryanti, Herlina Helmy, Erly Mulyani
{"title":"税收侵略性和欺诈会计会计行为","authors":"Suci Ardiryanti, Herlina Helmy, Erly Mulyani","doi":"10.24036/jea.v4i1.448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to examine the tax aggressiveness relationship accounting fraud. This study uses the Beneish M Score Model to detecting accounting fraud and then measured by a dummy variable. The tax aggressiveness variable measured using five proxies including, Effective Tax Rate (ETR1, ETR2, ETR3, ETR4) and Book Tax Differences (BTD).  The study population was manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2013-2017. The study sample was determined by purposive sampling, so that 53 samples of manufacturing companies were obtained. Based on panel data regression analysis, the result show that of the five proxies used to measure tax aggressiveness, only ETR4 had a significant positive related to accounting fraud. While ETR1, ETR2, and ETR3 have an insignificant negative related to accounting fraud, and BTD is positive related to accounting fraud but not significant. The conclusion of this study is that tax aggressiveness are not positively related significantly with accounting fraud so the hypothesis is rejected.","PeriodicalId":103854,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL EKSPLORASI AKUNTANSI","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agresivitas Pajak dan Kecurangan AkuntansiAgresivitas Pajak dan Kecurangan Akuntansi\",\"authors\":\"Suci Ardiryanti, Herlina Helmy, Erly Mulyani\",\"doi\":\"10.24036/jea.v4i1.448\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to examine the tax aggressiveness relationship accounting fraud. This study uses the Beneish M Score Model to detecting accounting fraud and then measured by a dummy variable. The tax aggressiveness variable measured using five proxies including, Effective Tax Rate (ETR1, ETR2, ETR3, ETR4) and Book Tax Differences (BTD).  The study population was manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2013-2017. The study sample was determined by purposive sampling, so that 53 samples of manufacturing companies were obtained. Based on panel data regression analysis, the result show that of the five proxies used to measure tax aggressiveness, only ETR4 had a significant positive related to accounting fraud. While ETR1, ETR2, and ETR3 have an insignificant negative related to accounting fraud, and BTD is positive related to accounting fraud but not significant. The conclusion of this study is that tax aggressiveness are not positively related significantly with accounting fraud so the hypothesis is rejected.\",\"PeriodicalId\":103854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JURNAL EKSPLORASI AKUNTANSI\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JURNAL EKSPLORASI AKUNTANSI\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24036/jea.v4i1.448\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURNAL EKSPLORASI AKUNTANSI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24036/jea.v4i1.448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨税务侵略性与会计舞弊的关系。本研究使用贝尼什M分数模型来检测会计舞弊,然后用一个虚拟变量来衡量。税收侵略性变量使用五个代理测量,包括有效税率(ETR1, ETR2, ETR3, ETR4)和账面税收差异(BTD)。研究对象是2013-2017年在印尼证券交易所上市的制造业公司。采用目的抽样法确定研究样本,共获得53家制造企业样本。基于面板数据回归分析,结果表明,在用于衡量税收侵略性的五个代理中,只有ETR4与会计欺诈具有显著的正相关。ETR1、ETR2、ETR3与会计舞弊负相关不显著,BTD与会计舞弊正相关但不显著。本研究的结论是,税收侵略性与会计欺诈没有显著的正相关,因此假设被驳回。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Agresivitas Pajak dan Kecurangan AkuntansiAgresivitas Pajak dan Kecurangan Akuntansi
This study aims to examine the tax aggressiveness relationship accounting fraud. This study uses the Beneish M Score Model to detecting accounting fraud and then measured by a dummy variable. The tax aggressiveness variable measured using five proxies including, Effective Tax Rate (ETR1, ETR2, ETR3, ETR4) and Book Tax Differences (BTD).  The study population was manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2013-2017. The study sample was determined by purposive sampling, so that 53 samples of manufacturing companies were obtained. Based on panel data regression analysis, the result show that of the five proxies used to measure tax aggressiveness, only ETR4 had a significant positive related to accounting fraud. While ETR1, ETR2, and ETR3 have an insignificant negative related to accounting fraud, and BTD is positive related to accounting fraud but not significant. The conclusion of this study is that tax aggressiveness are not positively related significantly with accounting fraud so the hypothesis is rejected.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pengaruh Ideologi Etis Terhadap Penilaian Etis Pengaruh Covid-19, Kualitas Auditor, dan Manajemen Laba terhadap Opini Audit: Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Sektor Property and Real Estate yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Analisis Flypaper Effect pada Pengaruh Pendapatan Asli Daerah (PAD), Dana Alokasi Umum (DAU), Dana Alokasi Khusus (DAK), dan Sisa Lebih Pembiayaan Anggaran (SiLPA) terhadap Belanja Daerah: Studi Empiris pada Pemerintah Kabupaten/Kota se Provinsi Sumatera Pengaruh Audit Tenure, Rotasi Audit, dan Fee Audit terhadap Kualitas Audit Pengaruh Financial Distress, Audit Report Lag dan Audit Tenure terhadap Integritas Laporan Keuangan: Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan BUMN yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1