“在自然的基础上增加人造器官”:罗伯特·胡克方法论中的扩展和分布式认知

Pieter Present
{"title":"“在自然的基础上增加人造器官”:罗伯特·胡克方法论中的扩展和分布式认知","authors":"Pieter Present","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474438131.003.0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter compares Robert Hooke’s views on the use of writing as an external memory with contemporary notions of extended and distributed cognition. The aim is not to portray Hooke as a proponent of these views avant la lettre, but to highlight certain interesting structural similarities and differences. Hooke believed that cognition could be externalised through the use of an external ‘repository’. In this case, cognition takes place through the manipulation of written material. This externalisation of memory makes it possible for other people to access, supplement, and organise the same ‘repository’, which allows for a cognitive division of labour. It is further shown how the Royal Society, of which Hooke was a member, is presented by Thomas Sprat as an enterprise aimed precisely at this kind of cognitive division of labour. The chapter concludes with a concrete example of an ‘external repository’ designed by Hooke, analysing the way it puts into practice Hooke’s ideas on individually and socially extended cognition.","PeriodicalId":419206,"journal":{"name":"Distributed Cognition in Medieval and Renaissance Culture","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘The adding of artificial organs to the natural’: Extended and Distributed Cognition in Robert Hooke’s Methodology\",\"authors\":\"Pieter Present\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474438131.003.0016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter compares Robert Hooke’s views on the use of writing as an external memory with contemporary notions of extended and distributed cognition. The aim is not to portray Hooke as a proponent of these views avant la lettre, but to highlight certain interesting structural similarities and differences. Hooke believed that cognition could be externalised through the use of an external ‘repository’. In this case, cognition takes place through the manipulation of written material. This externalisation of memory makes it possible for other people to access, supplement, and organise the same ‘repository’, which allows for a cognitive division of labour. It is further shown how the Royal Society, of which Hooke was a member, is presented by Thomas Sprat as an enterprise aimed precisely at this kind of cognitive division of labour. The chapter concludes with a concrete example of an ‘external repository’ designed by Hooke, analysing the way it puts into practice Hooke’s ideas on individually and socially extended cognition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":419206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Distributed Cognition in Medieval and Renaissance Culture\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Distributed Cognition in Medieval and Renaissance Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474438131.003.0016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Distributed Cognition in Medieval and Renaissance Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474438131.003.0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章比较了罗伯特·胡克关于将写作作为一种外部记忆的观点与当代关于扩展和分布式认知的观点。我的目的不是要把胡克描绘成这些观点的支持者,而是要强调一些有趣的结构上的异同。胡克认为,认知可以通过使用外部“存储库”而外部化。在这种情况下,认知是通过对书面材料的操纵而发生的。这种记忆的外部化使其他人能够访问、补充和组织相同的“存储库”,从而实现认知分工。书中还进一步展示了托马斯•斯普拉特是如何将胡克所在的皇家学会描述为一个旨在实现这种认知分工的企业的。本章最后以胡克设计的一个“外部存储库”的具体例子结尾,分析了它将胡克关于个人和社会扩展认知的思想付诸实践的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
‘The adding of artificial organs to the natural’: Extended and Distributed Cognition in Robert Hooke’s Methodology
This chapter compares Robert Hooke’s views on the use of writing as an external memory with contemporary notions of extended and distributed cognition. The aim is not to portray Hooke as a proponent of these views avant la lettre, but to highlight certain interesting structural similarities and differences. Hooke believed that cognition could be externalised through the use of an external ‘repository’. In this case, cognition takes place through the manipulation of written material. This externalisation of memory makes it possible for other people to access, supplement, and organise the same ‘repository’, which allows for a cognitive division of labour. It is further shown how the Royal Society, of which Hooke was a member, is presented by Thomas Sprat as an enterprise aimed precisely at this kind of cognitive division of labour. The chapter concludes with a concrete example of an ‘external repository’ designed by Hooke, analysing the way it puts into practice Hooke’s ideas on individually and socially extended cognition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pierced with Passion: Brains, Bodies and Worlds in Early Modern Texts Distributed Cognition, Improvisation and the Performing Arts in Early Modern Europe The Medieval (Music) Book: A Multimodal Cognitive Artefact Medieval Icelandic Legal Treatises as Tools for External Scaffolding of Legal Cognition ‘The adding of artificial organs to the natural’: Extended and Distributed Cognition in Robert Hooke’s Methodology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1