作为数字证据的数字化档案:在Kearsipan省Dinas Perpustakaan的准备情况观察

Wiwiet Mardiati, N. Grataridarga, Dyah Safitri
{"title":"作为数字证据的数字化档案:在Kearsipan省Dinas Perpustakaan的准备情况观察","authors":"Wiwiet Mardiati, N. Grataridarga, Dyah Safitri","doi":"10.2991/assehr.k.200331.119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". Currently, the process of archive digitization, especially from paper archives to digital format, is an option for companies to store their documents more efficiently and effectively. In addition, it can make document retrieval easier. However, although digitization is supported by Regulation No. 8 of 1997 on electronic documents, according to Hadiwardoyo (2001), the archives digitization process is not necessarily supported by the readiness of other legal instruments. Hadiwardoyo¹ argues that archive digitization involves two main things: the security of the media technology digitization device and the legal considerations related to the validity of the evidence in court. This research explores how the quality of the archive digitization process, especially in government, can be improved so that it is not just an effort toward e-governance but also acceptable for auditing as part of digital forensics.","PeriodicalId":325166,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Vocational Higher Education (ICVHE 2018)","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digitized Archive as Digital Evidence: Readiness Observation at Dinas Perpustakaan dan Kearsipan Provinsi DKI Jakarta\",\"authors\":\"Wiwiet Mardiati, N. Grataridarga, Dyah Safitri\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/assehr.k.200331.119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". Currently, the process of archive digitization, especially from paper archives to digital format, is an option for companies to store their documents more efficiently and effectively. In addition, it can make document retrieval easier. However, although digitization is supported by Regulation No. 8 of 1997 on electronic documents, according to Hadiwardoyo (2001), the archives digitization process is not necessarily supported by the readiness of other legal instruments. Hadiwardoyo¹ argues that archive digitization involves two main things: the security of the media technology digitization device and the legal considerations related to the validity of the evidence in court. This research explores how the quality of the archive digitization process, especially in government, can be improved so that it is not just an effort toward e-governance but also acceptable for auditing as part of digital forensics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":325166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Vocational Higher Education (ICVHE 2018)\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Vocational Higher Education (ICVHE 2018)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200331.119\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Vocational Higher Education (ICVHE 2018)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200331.119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

. 目前,档案数字化的过程,特别是从纸质档案到数字格式,是企业更高效、更有效地存储文件的一种选择。此外,它可以使文档检索更容易。然而,根据Hadiwardoyo(2001)的说法,尽管数字化得到了1997年关于电子文件的第8号条例的支持,但档案数字化进程并不一定得到其他法律文书的支持。Hadiwardoyo 1认为,档案数字化主要涉及两件事:媒体技术数字化设备的安全性以及与法庭证据有效性相关的法律考虑。本研究探讨了如何提高档案数字化过程的质量,特别是在政府中,以便它不仅是电子政务的一项努力,而且作为数字取证的一部分,也可以被审计所接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Digitized Archive as Digital Evidence: Readiness Observation at Dinas Perpustakaan dan Kearsipan Provinsi DKI Jakarta
. Currently, the process of archive digitization, especially from paper archives to digital format, is an option for companies to store their documents more efficiently and effectively. In addition, it can make document retrieval easier. However, although digitization is supported by Regulation No. 8 of 1997 on electronic documents, according to Hadiwardoyo (2001), the archives digitization process is not necessarily supported by the readiness of other legal instruments. Hadiwardoyo¹ argues that archive digitization involves two main things: the security of the media technology digitization device and the legal considerations related to the validity of the evidence in court. This research explores how the quality of the archive digitization process, especially in government, can be improved so that it is not just an effort toward e-governance but also acceptable for auditing as part of digital forensics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness Manual Therapy & Kinesio Tape, Versus Dry Needling & Exercise Stabilization, on Patient Low Back Pain Due to Hernia Nucleus Pulposus Agricultural Extension, Plant Breeder, and Plant Researcher Animation Video Type of Humor and Advertising Effectiveness: Study on Indonesian Children Aged 7–12 Service Quality Dimensions and Students’ Performance: Case Study in the Vocational Program of Universitas Indonesia A Theoretical Framework to Support Internationalization of SMEs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1