利用脑电图寻找精神分裂症的生物标志物

J. Laton, J. V. Schependom, J. Gielen, J. Decoster, T. Moons, J. Keyser, M. Hert, G. Nagels
{"title":"利用脑电图寻找精神分裂症的生物标志物","authors":"J. Laton, J. V. Schependom, J. Gielen, J. Decoster, T. Moons, J. Keyser, M. Hert, G. Nagels","doi":"10.1109/PRNI.2014.6858527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The diagnostic process for schizophrenia is mainly clinical and has to be performed by an experienced psychiatrist, relying mainly on clinical signs and symptoms. Current neurophysiological measurements can distinguish groups of healthy controls and groups of schizophrenia patients. Individual classification based on neurophysiological measurements only shows moderate accuracy. In this study, we wanted to examine whether it is possible to distinguish controls and patients individually with a good accuracy. To this end we used a combination of features from different test paradigms, in particular the auditory and visual P300 and the mismatch negativity. We selected 54 patients and 54 controls, matched for age and gender, from the data available at the UPC Kortenberg. The EEG-data were high- and low-pass filtered, epoched, artefacts were rejected and the epochs were averaged. Features (latencies and amplitudes of component peaks) were extracted from the averaged signals. The resulting dataset was used to train and test classification algorithms. Here we applied Naïve Bayes and Decision Tree (without and with AdaBoost). A combination of three evoked potentials allowed us to accurately classify individual subjects as either control or patient. For the three investigated classifiers a total accuracy of more than 80%, a sensitivity of above 82% and a specificity of at least 78% was found.","PeriodicalId":133286,"journal":{"name":"2014 International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Neuroimaging","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In search of biomarkers for schizophrenia using electroencephalography\",\"authors\":\"J. Laton, J. V. Schependom, J. Gielen, J. Decoster, T. Moons, J. Keyser, M. Hert, G. Nagels\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PRNI.2014.6858527\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The diagnostic process for schizophrenia is mainly clinical and has to be performed by an experienced psychiatrist, relying mainly on clinical signs and symptoms. Current neurophysiological measurements can distinguish groups of healthy controls and groups of schizophrenia patients. Individual classification based on neurophysiological measurements only shows moderate accuracy. In this study, we wanted to examine whether it is possible to distinguish controls and patients individually with a good accuracy. To this end we used a combination of features from different test paradigms, in particular the auditory and visual P300 and the mismatch negativity. We selected 54 patients and 54 controls, matched for age and gender, from the data available at the UPC Kortenberg. The EEG-data were high- and low-pass filtered, epoched, artefacts were rejected and the epochs were averaged. Features (latencies and amplitudes of component peaks) were extracted from the averaged signals. The resulting dataset was used to train and test classification algorithms. Here we applied Naïve Bayes and Decision Tree (without and with AdaBoost). A combination of three evoked potentials allowed us to accurately classify individual subjects as either control or patient. For the three investigated classifiers a total accuracy of more than 80%, a sensitivity of above 82% and a specificity of at least 78% was found.\",\"PeriodicalId\":133286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Neuroimaging\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Neuroimaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PRNI.2014.6858527\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PRNI.2014.6858527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

精神分裂症的诊断过程主要是临床的,必须由经验丰富的精神科医生进行,主要依靠临床体征和症状。目前的神经生理学测量可以区分健康对照组和精神分裂症患者组。基于神经生理测量的个体分类只显示出中等的准确性。在这项研究中,我们想要检验是否有可能以良好的准确性单独区分对照组和患者。为此,我们使用了来自不同测试范例的特征组合,特别是听觉和视觉P300以及不匹配的消极性。我们从UPC Kortenberg提供的数据中选择了54名患者和54名对照组,年龄和性别相匹配。对脑电图数据进行高通和低通滤波,epoch,去除伪影,并对epoch进行平均。从平均信号中提取特征(延迟和分量峰幅)。得到的数据集用于训练和测试分类算法。这里我们应用Naïve贝叶斯和决策树(没有AdaBoost和有AdaBoost)。三种诱发电位的组合使我们能够准确地将个体受试者分类为对照组或患者。对于所研究的三种分类器,发现总准确率超过80%,灵敏度超过82%,特异性至少为78%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In search of biomarkers for schizophrenia using electroencephalography
The diagnostic process for schizophrenia is mainly clinical and has to be performed by an experienced psychiatrist, relying mainly on clinical signs and symptoms. Current neurophysiological measurements can distinguish groups of healthy controls and groups of schizophrenia patients. Individual classification based on neurophysiological measurements only shows moderate accuracy. In this study, we wanted to examine whether it is possible to distinguish controls and patients individually with a good accuracy. To this end we used a combination of features from different test paradigms, in particular the auditory and visual P300 and the mismatch negativity. We selected 54 patients and 54 controls, matched for age and gender, from the data available at the UPC Kortenberg. The EEG-data were high- and low-pass filtered, epoched, artefacts were rejected and the epochs were averaged. Features (latencies and amplitudes of component peaks) were extracted from the averaged signals. The resulting dataset was used to train and test classification algorithms. Here we applied Naïve Bayes and Decision Tree (without and with AdaBoost). A combination of three evoked potentials allowed us to accurately classify individual subjects as either control or patient. For the three investigated classifiers a total accuracy of more than 80%, a sensitivity of above 82% and a specificity of at least 78% was found.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Causal and anti-causal learning in pattern recognition for neuroimaging Gaussian mixture models improve fMRI-based image reconstruction Combining neuroanatomical and clinical data to improve individualized early diagnosis of schizophrenia in subjects at high familial risk Bayesian correlated component analysis for inference of joint EEG activation Permutation distributions of fMRI classification do not behave in accord with central limit theorem
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1