透析因素及给药途径对血液透析患者重组人促红细胞生成素反应的影响。

ASAIO transactions Pub Date : 1991-07-01
A Besarab, F M Besarab, D Miller
{"title":"透析因素及给药途径对血液透析患者重组人促红细胞生成素反应的影响。","authors":"A Besarab,&nbsp;F M Besarab,&nbsp;D Miller","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Data on the use of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) were obtained from 25 hemodialysis centers to determine whether route of administration (intravenous [i.v.] vs. subcutaneous [s.c.]) or various dialysis factors influenced the response to rHuEPO; 844 of 958 patients had sufficient data for evaluation. Hematocrit (HCT) increased from 23.8 to 29.1% after a mean rHuEPO treatment period of 202 days; 48.4% of all patients did not reach a HCT greater than or equal to 29%. The s.c. route increased HCT more than the i.v. route. Multivariate analysis of the response (i.e., increase in HCT from baseline) showed a positive correlation with more rapid dialysis but a negative correlation with reuse, baseline HCT, transfusion dependence, and frequency of administration. The effects of dialysis and reuse were not present when the response was normalized by weekly dose. It was concluded that one half of all patients treated did not attain the recommended target HCT, perhaps due to economic constraints or resetting of goals. The s.c. route may be preferable to optimize response.</p>","PeriodicalId":77493,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO transactions","volume":"37 3","pages":"M181-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of dialysis factors and route of administration on response of hemodialysis patients to recombinant human erythropoietin.\",\"authors\":\"A Besarab,&nbsp;F M Besarab,&nbsp;D Miller\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Data on the use of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) were obtained from 25 hemodialysis centers to determine whether route of administration (intravenous [i.v.] vs. subcutaneous [s.c.]) or various dialysis factors influenced the response to rHuEPO; 844 of 958 patients had sufficient data for evaluation. Hematocrit (HCT) increased from 23.8 to 29.1% after a mean rHuEPO treatment period of 202 days; 48.4% of all patients did not reach a HCT greater than or equal to 29%. The s.c. route increased HCT more than the i.v. route. Multivariate analysis of the response (i.e., increase in HCT from baseline) showed a positive correlation with more rapid dialysis but a negative correlation with reuse, baseline HCT, transfusion dependence, and frequency of administration. The effects of dialysis and reuse were not present when the response was normalized by weekly dose. It was concluded that one half of all patients treated did not attain the recommended target HCT, perhaps due to economic constraints or resetting of goals. The s.c. route may be preferable to optimize response.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77493,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASAIO transactions\",\"volume\":\"37 3\",\"pages\":\"M181-2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASAIO transactions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASAIO transactions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从25个血液透析中心获得重组人促红细胞生成素(rHuEPO)的使用数据,以确定给药途径(静脉注射[静脉注射]。[s.c.])或各种透析因素影响rHuEPO的反应;958例患者中有844例有足够的资料进行评估。rHuEPO平均治疗202 d后,红细胞压积(HCT)由23.8%上升至29.1%;48.4%的患者HCT未达到大于或等于29%。s.c.给药比静脉给药更能提高HCT。反应的多变量分析(即HCT从基线增加)显示与更快速的透析呈正相关,但与重复使用、基线HCT、输血依赖和给药频率呈负相关。透析和重复使用的效果不存在,当反应是标准化的每周剂量。结论是,一半接受治疗的患者没有达到推荐的HCT目标,可能是由于经济限制或目标的重新设定。s.c.路径可能更适合优化响应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of dialysis factors and route of administration on response of hemodialysis patients to recombinant human erythropoietin.

Data on the use of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) were obtained from 25 hemodialysis centers to determine whether route of administration (intravenous [i.v.] vs. subcutaneous [s.c.]) or various dialysis factors influenced the response to rHuEPO; 844 of 958 patients had sufficient data for evaluation. Hematocrit (HCT) increased from 23.8 to 29.1% after a mean rHuEPO treatment period of 202 days; 48.4% of all patients did not reach a HCT greater than or equal to 29%. The s.c. route increased HCT more than the i.v. route. Multivariate analysis of the response (i.e., increase in HCT from baseline) showed a positive correlation with more rapid dialysis but a negative correlation with reuse, baseline HCT, transfusion dependence, and frequency of administration. The effects of dialysis and reuse were not present when the response was normalized by weekly dose. It was concluded that one half of all patients treated did not attain the recommended target HCT, perhaps due to economic constraints or resetting of goals. The s.c. route may be preferable to optimize response.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mechanism of dialysis-induced hypotension. Platelet preservation during cardiopulmonary bypass with iloprost and Duraflo-II heparin-coated surfaces. Peritoneal fluid kinetics during CAPD measured with intraperitoneal dextran 70. Influence of centrifugal blood pumps on the elasticity of erythrocytes. Reuse of "highly permeable" dialyzers with peroxyacetic acid as sole cleansing and disinfecting agent.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1