{"title":"人-人多线程对话中的约定:初步研究","authors":"P. Heeman, Fan Yang, A. Kun, A. Shyrokov","doi":"10.1145/1040830.1040903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we explore the conventions that people use in managing multiple dialogue threads. In particular, we focus on where in a thread people interrupt when switching to another thread. We find that some subjects are able to vary where they switch depending on how urgent the interrupting task is. When time-allowed, they switched at the end of a discourse segment, which we hypothesize is less disruptive to the interrupted task when it is later resumed.","PeriodicalId":376409,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conventions in human-human multi-threaded dialogues: a preliminary study\",\"authors\":\"P. Heeman, Fan Yang, A. Kun, A. Shyrokov\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1040830.1040903\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we explore the conventions that people use in managing multiple dialogue threads. In particular, we focus on where in a thread people interrupt when switching to another thread. We find that some subjects are able to vary where they switch depending on how urgent the interrupting task is. When time-allowed, they switched at the end of a discourse segment, which we hypothesize is less disruptive to the interrupted task when it is later resumed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":376409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1040830.1040903\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1040830.1040903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Conventions in human-human multi-threaded dialogues: a preliminary study
In this paper, we explore the conventions that people use in managing multiple dialogue threads. In particular, we focus on where in a thread people interrupt when switching to another thread. We find that some subjects are able to vary where they switch depending on how urgent the interrupting task is. When time-allowed, they switched at the end of a discourse segment, which we hypothesize is less disruptive to the interrupted task when it is later resumed.