FEES和吞咽困难小组在医院卒中后患者管理中的作用České budkjovice

M. Huska, L. Koptíková, P. Lukes, L. Mrzena
{"title":"FEES和吞咽困难小组在医院卒中后患者管理中的作用České budkjovice","authors":"M. Huska, L. Koptíková, P. Lukes, L. Mrzena","doi":"10.48095/ccorl2022196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The prevalence of dysphagia in the general population is 6–16%. The dysphagia team focuses on dia­gnosis and treatment of dysphagia. The dysphagia team consists of a clinical speech therapist, an otorhinolaryngologist and nurse (depending on the workplace). Other specialties such as radiologist, nutritionist and physiotherapist can also be a member of the team. FEES (Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing) and VFSS (Videofluoroscopic Swallow Study) are used as the gold standard for objective examination of the dysphagia. Aim of the work: The aim of the work is to evaluate retrospectively the contribution of the dysphagia team working in the department of otorhinolaryngology in Hospital České Budějovice, in the care of patients after stroke disease indicated for examination from the Complex Cerebrovascular Center (CCC) in 2016–2020. Material and methods: The retrospective study included 33 patients after stroke with clinical suspicion of dysphagia, who were referred from the CCC to the Counseling Center for Swallowing Disorders for objective examination of dysphagia. Results: In 9 patients (27.3%), dysphagia was ruled out during FEES, thus enabling oral intake without restrictions. Dysphagia was confirmed in 24 patients (72.7%). Ten patients (30.3%) had a prolonged pharyngeal swallowing phase without food penetration into the airways. Three patients (9.1%) had a bolus penetration into the airways during the examination, but it remained above the vocal cords and it was completely expelled from the airways (PAS 2). In 11 cases (33.3%) aspiration was found, of which nine cases (27.3% of all patients, 81.8% of patients with aspiration) involved silent aspiration without any attempt to expel bolus from the airways (PAS 8). Conclusion: In 31 patients (94.0%) the benefit of examination by the dysphagia team was noted. In the case of 22 patients (66.7%), it was an adjustment of nutrition and swallowing rehabilitation with confirmed dysphagia. Restrictions were lifted in 9 patients (27.3%) with false-positive screening and clinical examination. We observe a positive effect of long-term swallowing rehabilitation in 61.5% of the monitored patients. Keywords: endoscopy – stroke – rehabilitation – deglutition disorder","PeriodicalId":423943,"journal":{"name":"Otorinolaryngologie a foniatrie","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of FEES and the dysphagia team in the management of patients after stroke disease in Hospital České Budějovice\",\"authors\":\"M. Huska, L. Koptíková, P. Lukes, L. Mrzena\",\"doi\":\"10.48095/ccorl2022196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The prevalence of dysphagia in the general population is 6–16%. The dysphagia team focuses on dia­gnosis and treatment of dysphagia. The dysphagia team consists of a clinical speech therapist, an otorhinolaryngologist and nurse (depending on the workplace). Other specialties such as radiologist, nutritionist and physiotherapist can also be a member of the team. FEES (Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing) and VFSS (Videofluoroscopic Swallow Study) are used as the gold standard for objective examination of the dysphagia. Aim of the work: The aim of the work is to evaluate retrospectively the contribution of the dysphagia team working in the department of otorhinolaryngology in Hospital České Budějovice, in the care of patients after stroke disease indicated for examination from the Complex Cerebrovascular Center (CCC) in 2016–2020. Material and methods: The retrospective study included 33 patients after stroke with clinical suspicion of dysphagia, who were referred from the CCC to the Counseling Center for Swallowing Disorders for objective examination of dysphagia. Results: In 9 patients (27.3%), dysphagia was ruled out during FEES, thus enabling oral intake without restrictions. Dysphagia was confirmed in 24 patients (72.7%). Ten patients (30.3%) had a prolonged pharyngeal swallowing phase without food penetration into the airways. Three patients (9.1%) had a bolus penetration into the airways during the examination, but it remained above the vocal cords and it was completely expelled from the airways (PAS 2). In 11 cases (33.3%) aspiration was found, of which nine cases (27.3% of all patients, 81.8% of patients with aspiration) involved silent aspiration without any attempt to expel bolus from the airways (PAS 8). Conclusion: In 31 patients (94.0%) the benefit of examination by the dysphagia team was noted. In the case of 22 patients (66.7%), it was an adjustment of nutrition and swallowing rehabilitation with confirmed dysphagia. Restrictions were lifted in 9 patients (27.3%) with false-positive screening and clinical examination. We observe a positive effect of long-term swallowing rehabilitation in 61.5% of the monitored patients. Keywords: endoscopy – stroke – rehabilitation – deglutition disorder\",\"PeriodicalId\":423943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otorinolaryngologie a foniatrie\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otorinolaryngologie a foniatrie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48095/ccorl2022196\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otorinolaryngologie a foniatrie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48095/ccorl2022196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在一般人群中,吞咽困难的患病率为6-16%。吞咽困难小组专注于吞咽困难的诊断和治疗。吞咽困难小组由一名临床语言治疗师、一名耳鼻喉科医生和一名护士(取决于工作场所)组成。其他专业如放射科医生、营养学家和物理治疗师也可以成为团队成员。FEES(柔性内窥镜吞咽评估)和VFSS(可视透视吞咽研究)被用作客观检查吞咽困难的金标准。工作目的:该工作的目的是回顾性评估České budbudjovice医院耳鼻喉科吞咽困难团队在2016-2020年复杂脑血管中心(CCC)提示检查的脑卒中患者的护理中的贡献。材料与方法:回顾性研究纳入33例卒中后临床怀疑吞咽困难的患者,由CCC转至吞咽障碍咨询中心进行客观的吞咽困难检查。结果:9例患者(27.3%)在fee期间排除了吞咽困难,因此可以不受限制地口服摄入。24例患者确诊为吞咽困难(72.7%)。10例患者(30.3%)咽部吞咽期延长,未见食物渗入气道。3例(9.1%)患者在检查过程中有颗粒渗透到气道中,但颗粒仍在声带上方,并完全从气道中排出(PAS 2)。11例(33.3%)患者发现误吸,其中9例(占所有患者的27.3%,占误吸患者的81.8%)为无声误吸,未尝试将颗粒从气道中排出(PAS 8)。结论:31例(94.0%)患者注意到吞咽困难小组检查的益处。22例(66.7%)患者确认吞咽困难后进行营养调整和吞咽康复。通过假阳性筛查和临床检查,9例(27.3%)患者解除了限制。我们观察到61.5%的监测患者长期吞咽康复的积极效果。关键词:内窥镜-中风-康复-吞咽障碍
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The role of FEES and the dysphagia team in the management of patients after stroke disease in Hospital České Budějovice
Introduction: The prevalence of dysphagia in the general population is 6–16%. The dysphagia team focuses on dia­gnosis and treatment of dysphagia. The dysphagia team consists of a clinical speech therapist, an otorhinolaryngologist and nurse (depending on the workplace). Other specialties such as radiologist, nutritionist and physiotherapist can also be a member of the team. FEES (Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing) and VFSS (Videofluoroscopic Swallow Study) are used as the gold standard for objective examination of the dysphagia. Aim of the work: The aim of the work is to evaluate retrospectively the contribution of the dysphagia team working in the department of otorhinolaryngology in Hospital České Budějovice, in the care of patients after stroke disease indicated for examination from the Complex Cerebrovascular Center (CCC) in 2016–2020. Material and methods: The retrospective study included 33 patients after stroke with clinical suspicion of dysphagia, who were referred from the CCC to the Counseling Center for Swallowing Disorders for objective examination of dysphagia. Results: In 9 patients (27.3%), dysphagia was ruled out during FEES, thus enabling oral intake without restrictions. Dysphagia was confirmed in 24 patients (72.7%). Ten patients (30.3%) had a prolonged pharyngeal swallowing phase without food penetration into the airways. Three patients (9.1%) had a bolus penetration into the airways during the examination, but it remained above the vocal cords and it was completely expelled from the airways (PAS 2). In 11 cases (33.3%) aspiration was found, of which nine cases (27.3% of all patients, 81.8% of patients with aspiration) involved silent aspiration without any attempt to expel bolus from the airways (PAS 8). Conclusion: In 31 patients (94.0%) the benefit of examination by the dysphagia team was noted. In the case of 22 patients (66.7%), it was an adjustment of nutrition and swallowing rehabilitation with confirmed dysphagia. Restrictions were lifted in 9 patients (27.3%) with false-positive screening and clinical examination. We observe a positive effect of long-term swallowing rehabilitation in 61.5% of the monitored patients. Keywords: endoscopy – stroke – rehabilitation – deglutition disorder
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nontuberculous mycobacterial infections in children Are our investigation methods sensitive enough to hearing damage caused by noise? Intraoperative use of enhanced contact endoscopy for evaluation of laryngeal mucosal lesions, validation of ELS classification First experience with the use of a silicone stent in the treatment of posterior glottic stenosis – a case report PFAPA syndrome in children, our experience with surgical treatment – review article with a case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1