腹膜后镜下单纯性肾囊肿切除术优点和缺点-我们的经验

I. Madadov, E. Belgibaev, Zh.M. Syrymov, E. Nabiev, B.G. Rgebaev, N. Saduakas
{"title":"腹膜后镜下单纯性肾囊肿切除术优点和缺点-我们的经验","authors":"I. Madadov, E. Belgibaev, Zh.M. Syrymov, E. Nabiev, B.G. Rgebaev, N. Saduakas","doi":"10.35805/bsk2022ii005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"bstract Objective. Assess advantages and disadvantages of retroperitoneoscopic access for the resection of renal cysts in clinical practice. Material and methods. For the period from 01/09/2020 tо 30/11/2021, in our center we performed 25 retroperitoneal endoscopic resections of renal cysts. Access was made through Lesgaft-Grunfield triangle. All patients underwent standard clinical evaluation for renal cysts. Results. Retroperitoneal access was performed for all patients by standard technique. All surgeries were finished without conversion to open surgery. Mean duration of surgery was 25,45 ± 2,55 min. Mean intraoperative blood loss was 20,4 ± 0,6 ml. Intra – andpostoperativecomplications, that required extra interventions were not encountered. Meanhospital – instaywas 4,6 ± 0,4 days and patients soon after discharge returned to their daily activities. All patients were under follow-up to 12 months. Conclusion. Retroperitoneal endoscopic access is a good alternative for laparoscopic access for surgical treatment of renal cysts, with less trauma and with no invasion into peritoneal cavity. Timeofrecoveryisthesame aswithlaparoscopy. This technique is also carries good cosmetic effect. One of main advantages is that in this access it is possible to hold high CO2 pressure, that is particularly in patients with ischemic heart disease is undesirable to hold high intraabdominal pressure","PeriodicalId":197118,"journal":{"name":"BULLETIN OF SURGERY IN KAZAKHSTAN","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RETROPERITONEOSCOPIC EXCISION OF SIMPLE KIDNEY CYSTS; ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES - OUR EXPERIENCE\",\"authors\":\"I. Madadov, E. Belgibaev, Zh.M. Syrymov, E. Nabiev, B.G. Rgebaev, N. Saduakas\",\"doi\":\"10.35805/bsk2022ii005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"bstract Objective. Assess advantages and disadvantages of retroperitoneoscopic access for the resection of renal cysts in clinical practice. Material and methods. For the period from 01/09/2020 tо 30/11/2021, in our center we performed 25 retroperitoneal endoscopic resections of renal cysts. Access was made through Lesgaft-Grunfield triangle. All patients underwent standard clinical evaluation for renal cysts. Results. Retroperitoneal access was performed for all patients by standard technique. All surgeries were finished without conversion to open surgery. Mean duration of surgery was 25,45 ± 2,55 min. Mean intraoperative blood loss was 20,4 ± 0,6 ml. Intra – andpostoperativecomplications, that required extra interventions were not encountered. Meanhospital – instaywas 4,6 ± 0,4 days and patients soon after discharge returned to their daily activities. All patients were under follow-up to 12 months. Conclusion. Retroperitoneal endoscopic access is a good alternative for laparoscopic access for surgical treatment of renal cysts, with less trauma and with no invasion into peritoneal cavity. Timeofrecoveryisthesame aswithlaparoscopy. This technique is also carries good cosmetic effect. One of main advantages is that in this access it is possible to hold high CO2 pressure, that is particularly in patients with ischemic heart disease is undesirable to hold high intraabdominal pressure\",\"PeriodicalId\":197118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BULLETIN OF SURGERY IN KAZAKHSTAN\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BULLETIN OF SURGERY IN KAZAKHSTAN\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35805/bsk2022ii005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BULLETIN OF SURGERY IN KAZAKHSTAN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35805/bsk2022ii005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

bstract目标。评价临床应用后腹膜镜入路切除肾囊肿的利弊。材料和方法。在2020年9月1日至2021年11月30日期间,我们在我中心进行了25例肾囊肿腹膜后内镜切除术。通道是莱斯加夫特-格伦菲尔德三角。所有患者均接受肾囊肿的标准临床评估。结果。所有患者均采用标准技术进行腹膜后通路。所有手术均完成,未转开腹手术。平均手术时间为25,45±2,55分钟,平均术中失血量为20,4±0,6 ml。术中和术后未发生需要额外干预的并发症。平均住院时间(4,6±0,4)d,出院后很快恢复日常活动。所有患者随访12个月。结论。经腹膜后内镜入路是腹腔镜下肾囊肿手术治疗的一种较好的替代方法,创伤小且不侵犯腹腔。Timeofrecoveryisthesame aswithlaparoscopy。这种方法也具有良好的美容效果。一个主要的优点是,在这个通道中,它可以保持高二氧化碳压力,特别是在患有缺血性心脏病的患者中,不希望保持高腹内压
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
RETROPERITONEOSCOPIC EXCISION OF SIMPLE KIDNEY CYSTS; ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES - OUR EXPERIENCE
bstract Objective. Assess advantages and disadvantages of retroperitoneoscopic access for the resection of renal cysts in clinical practice. Material and methods. For the period from 01/09/2020 tо 30/11/2021, in our center we performed 25 retroperitoneal endoscopic resections of renal cysts. Access was made through Lesgaft-Grunfield triangle. All patients underwent standard clinical evaluation for renal cysts. Results. Retroperitoneal access was performed for all patients by standard technique. All surgeries were finished without conversion to open surgery. Mean duration of surgery was 25,45 ± 2,55 min. Mean intraoperative blood loss was 20,4 ± 0,6 ml. Intra – andpostoperativecomplications, that required extra interventions were not encountered. Meanhospital – instaywas 4,6 ± 0,4 days and patients soon after discharge returned to their daily activities. All patients were under follow-up to 12 months. Conclusion. Retroperitoneal endoscopic access is a good alternative for laparoscopic access for surgical treatment of renal cysts, with less trauma and with no invasion into peritoneal cavity. Timeofrecoveryisthesame aswithlaparoscopy. This technique is also carries good cosmetic effect. One of main advantages is that in this access it is possible to hold high CO2 pressure, that is particularly in patients with ischemic heart disease is undesirable to hold high intraabdominal pressure
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
THORACOSCOPY VERSUS STERNOTOMY IN THE CORRECTION OF A VENTRICULAR SEPTAL DEFECT: A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FROM THE SURGICAL DEPARTMENT OF A MULTIDISCIPLINARY HOSPITAL IN DYNAMIC OVER 5 YEARS (2017-2021) METHOD FOR OPTIMIZING CT VOLUMETRY OF THE LIVER IN RELATED TRANSPLANTATION CURRENT ISSUES OF ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF RADIOLOGICAL STUDIES CONDUCTED WITHIN THE GUARANTEED VOLUME OF FREE MEDICAL CARE AND IN THE SYSTEM OF MANDATORY SOCIAL HEALTH INSURANCE INTENSIVE CARE SERVICE OPTIMIZATION FOR COVID-19 PANDEMIC IN ALMATY CITY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1