版权刑事化如何威胁创新与法治

Timothy B. Lee
{"title":"版权刑事化如何威胁创新与法治","authors":"Timothy B. Lee","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3847005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The trade-off between the harms of copyright infringement and the harms to innovation from overzealous enforcement have been central to the copyright debate for decades. US courts have tried to fashion a body of law that strikes a balance between these dangers. Two related trends in copyright enforcement threaten to upend this balance. First, the federal government has begun to criminally prosecute online intermediaries who allegedly facilitate the infringing activities of users. The threat of civil liability already gives entrepreneurs strong incentives to follow the law, so adding criminal penalties may cause them to become excessively risk-averse, depriving consumers of valuable innovations. Second, using civil forfeiture powers granted by the 2008 PRO-IP Act, the federal government has begun seizing the domain names, servers, and other assets of online intermediaries. This power to seize assets prior to conviction is making a mockery of defendants’ constitutional rights. These two trends threaten both the rule of law and online innovation.","PeriodicalId":425688,"journal":{"name":"IRPN: Innovation & Copyright Law & Policy (Sub-Topic)","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How the Criminalization of Copyright Threatens Innovation and the Rule of Law\",\"authors\":\"Timothy B. Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3847005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The trade-off between the harms of copyright infringement and the harms to innovation from overzealous enforcement have been central to the copyright debate for decades. US courts have tried to fashion a body of law that strikes a balance between these dangers. Two related trends in copyright enforcement threaten to upend this balance. First, the federal government has begun to criminally prosecute online intermediaries who allegedly facilitate the infringing activities of users. The threat of civil liability already gives entrepreneurs strong incentives to follow the law, so adding criminal penalties may cause them to become excessively risk-averse, depriving consumers of valuable innovations. Second, using civil forfeiture powers granted by the 2008 PRO-IP Act, the federal government has begun seizing the domain names, servers, and other assets of online intermediaries. This power to seize assets prior to conviction is making a mockery of defendants’ constitutional rights. These two trends threaten both the rule of law and online innovation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":425688,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IRPN: Innovation & Copyright Law & Policy (Sub-Topic)\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IRPN: Innovation & Copyright Law & Policy (Sub-Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3847005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRPN: Innovation & Copyright Law & Policy (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3847005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

几十年来,版权侵权的危害与过度执法对创新的危害之间的权衡一直是版权辩论的核心。美国法院试图形成一套在这些危险之间取得平衡的法律体系。版权执法方面的两个相关趋势可能会颠覆这种平衡。首先,联邦政府已经开始对涉嫌为用户的侵权活动提供便利的网络中介机构进行刑事起诉。民事责任的威胁已经给了企业家遵守法律的强烈动机,因此增加刑事处罚可能会使他们变得过度规避风险,剥夺消费者有价值的创新。其次,利用2008年PRO-IP法案授予的民事没收权,联邦政府已经开始没收网络中介机构的域名、服务器和其他资产。这种在定罪前扣押资产的权力是对被告宪法权利的嘲弄。这两种趋势对法治和网络创新都构成了威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How the Criminalization of Copyright Threatens Innovation and the Rule of Law
The trade-off between the harms of copyright infringement and the harms to innovation from overzealous enforcement have been central to the copyright debate for decades. US courts have tried to fashion a body of law that strikes a balance between these dangers. Two related trends in copyright enforcement threaten to upend this balance. First, the federal government has begun to criminally prosecute online intermediaries who allegedly facilitate the infringing activities of users. The threat of civil liability already gives entrepreneurs strong incentives to follow the law, so adding criminal penalties may cause them to become excessively risk-averse, depriving consumers of valuable innovations. Second, using civil forfeiture powers granted by the 2008 PRO-IP Act, the federal government has begun seizing the domain names, servers, and other assets of online intermediaries. This power to seize assets prior to conviction is making a mockery of defendants’ constitutional rights. These two trends threaten both the rule of law and online innovation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Graphical Representation and Indian Trademark Law Technical Aspects of Artificial Intelligence: An Understanding from an Intellectual Property Law Perspective Highway Art Policy Revisited: Rethinking Transfers of Copyright Ownership in State-Owned Transportation Artwork Determinants, Causal Connections and Outcomes of Corporate Technology Licensing: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda Accountable, Not Liable: Injunctions Against Intermediaries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1