致SEC的意见信:董事会投票建议的价值

Bernard S. Sharfman
{"title":"致SEC的意见信:董事会投票建议的价值","authors":"Bernard S. Sharfman","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3302208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This comment letter to the SEC's staff roundtable on the proxy process requests the SEC to provide investment advisers with a liability safe harbor under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 when using board voting recommendations in voting their proxies as long as their clients do not prohibit their use and no significant business relationship exists between the investment adviser and the company whose shares are being voted. <br><br>The implementation of this safe harbor will effectively reverse and correct a long-standing SEC policy where the value of proxy advisor recommendations is recognized but the value of board voting recommendations is not. This policy has existed even though a strong argument can be made that board voting recommendations are more informed and precise than proxy advisor voting recommendations. That argument was made in my comment letter dated October 12, 2018. This submission can be considered a continuation of that letter.","PeriodicalId":271630,"journal":{"name":"CGN: Enforcement by Public Regulators (Sub-Topic)","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comment Letter to the SEC: The Value of Board Voting Recommendations\",\"authors\":\"Bernard S. Sharfman\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3302208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This comment letter to the SEC's staff roundtable on the proxy process requests the SEC to provide investment advisers with a liability safe harbor under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 when using board voting recommendations in voting their proxies as long as their clients do not prohibit their use and no significant business relationship exists between the investment adviser and the company whose shares are being voted. <br><br>The implementation of this safe harbor will effectively reverse and correct a long-standing SEC policy where the value of proxy advisor recommendations is recognized but the value of board voting recommendations is not. This policy has existed even though a strong argument can be made that board voting recommendations are more informed and precise than proxy advisor voting recommendations. That argument was made in my comment letter dated October 12, 2018. This submission can be considered a continuation of that letter.\",\"PeriodicalId\":271630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CGN: Enforcement by Public Regulators (Sub-Topic)\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CGN: Enforcement by Public Regulators (Sub-Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3302208\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CGN: Enforcement by Public Regulators (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3302208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这封致美国证券交易委员会工作人员圆桌会议的意见信要求美国证券交易委员会根据1940年《投资顾问法》为投资顾问提供责任安全港,当他们在投票代理时使用董事会投票建议时,只要他们的客户不禁止他们使用,并且投资顾问与被投票股票的公司之间不存在重大业务关系。这一安全港的实施将有效地扭转和纠正SEC长期以来的一项政策,即代理权顾问建议的价值得到认可,但董事会投票建议的价值却没有得到认可。这一政策一直存在,尽管可以提出强有力的论点,即董事会投票建议比代理顾问投票建议更明智、更准确。这是我在2018年10月12日的评论信中提出的观点。本函可视为该信的延续。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comment Letter to the SEC: The Value of Board Voting Recommendations
This comment letter to the SEC's staff roundtable on the proxy process requests the SEC to provide investment advisers with a liability safe harbor under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 when using board voting recommendations in voting their proxies as long as their clients do not prohibit their use and no significant business relationship exists between the investment adviser and the company whose shares are being voted.

The implementation of this safe harbor will effectively reverse and correct a long-standing SEC policy where the value of proxy advisor recommendations is recognized but the value of board voting recommendations is not. This policy has existed even though a strong argument can be made that board voting recommendations are more informed and precise than proxy advisor voting recommendations. That argument was made in my comment letter dated October 12, 2018. This submission can be considered a continuation of that letter.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SEC Comment Letters on Firms’ Use of Non-GAAP Measures: The Determinants and Firms’ Responses Comment Letter to the SEC: The Value of Board Voting Recommendations The New Internationalism? IOSCO, International Standards and Capital Markets Regulation The Effects of Cross-Border Cooperation on Enforcement and Earnings Attributes Who Can't Raise Capital?: The Scylla and Charybdis of Capital Formation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1