[眼压和经典眼压测量与疑似青光眼和高眼压患者预后的相关性]。

W Wetzel, M Geck, G Duncker, H Bernsmeier
{"title":"[眼压和经典眼压测量与疑似青光眼和高眼压患者预后的相关性]。","authors":"W Wetzel,&nbsp;M Geck,&nbsp;G Duncker,&nbsp;H Bernsmeier","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A total of 44 eyes of patients with suspected glaucoma or ocular hypertension were examined both by ocular pressure tonometry (OPT) according to Ulrich and by tonography according to Leydhecker. The visual fields of these eyes were prospectively followed up for 3 years to compare the prognostic value of the two methods. In 30 of the 44 eyes a worsening visual field loss was observed, while in 14 the visual fields showed no change. Much better correlation was noted between values obtained by OPT and changes in visual field than between values obtained by tonography and visual field loss. Conventional tonography yielded 39% of false-negative values, but only 11% were recorded with OPT. Therefore, according to results of these and further investigations, OPT appears to be a more helpful and reliable method for assessment and decisions on therapy in patients with suspected glaucoma or ocular hypertension.</p>","PeriodicalId":12437,"journal":{"name":"Fortschritte der Ophthalmologie : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft","volume":"88 5","pages":"509-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Relevance of ocular pressure tonometry and classical tonometry with reference to prognosis in suspected glaucoma and ocular hypertension].\",\"authors\":\"W Wetzel,&nbsp;M Geck,&nbsp;G Duncker,&nbsp;H Bernsmeier\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A total of 44 eyes of patients with suspected glaucoma or ocular hypertension were examined both by ocular pressure tonometry (OPT) according to Ulrich and by tonography according to Leydhecker. The visual fields of these eyes were prospectively followed up for 3 years to compare the prognostic value of the two methods. In 30 of the 44 eyes a worsening visual field loss was observed, while in 14 the visual fields showed no change. Much better correlation was noted between values obtained by OPT and changes in visual field than between values obtained by tonography and visual field loss. Conventional tonography yielded 39% of false-negative values, but only 11% were recorded with OPT. Therefore, according to results of these and further investigations, OPT appears to be a more helpful and reliable method for assessment and decisions on therapy in patients with suspected glaucoma or ocular hypertension.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fortschritte der Ophthalmologie : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft\",\"volume\":\"88 5\",\"pages\":\"509-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fortschritte der Ophthalmologie : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fortschritte der Ophthalmologie : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对疑似青光眼或高眼压患者共44只眼进行Ulrich眼压眼压测定(OPT)和Leydhecker眼压图检查。前瞻性随访3年,比较两种方法的预后价值。在44只眼睛中,有30只眼睛的视野丧失恶化,而14只眼睛的视野没有变化。相比于张力描记法与视野丧失之间的相关性,OPT测量值与视野变化之间的相关性要好得多。常规张力图产生了39%的假阴性值,而OPT只记录了11%。因此,根据这些结果和进一步的研究,OPT似乎是评估和决定疑似青光眼或高眼压患者治疗的更有用和可靠的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Relevance of ocular pressure tonometry and classical tonometry with reference to prognosis in suspected glaucoma and ocular hypertension].

A total of 44 eyes of patients with suspected glaucoma or ocular hypertension were examined both by ocular pressure tonometry (OPT) according to Ulrich and by tonography according to Leydhecker. The visual fields of these eyes were prospectively followed up for 3 years to compare the prognostic value of the two methods. In 30 of the 44 eyes a worsening visual field loss was observed, while in 14 the visual fields showed no change. Much better correlation was noted between values obtained by OPT and changes in visual field than between values obtained by tonography and visual field loss. Conventional tonography yielded 39% of false-negative values, but only 11% were recorded with OPT. Therefore, according to results of these and further investigations, OPT appears to be a more helpful and reliable method for assessment and decisions on therapy in patients with suspected glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Thermoradiotherapy for Malignant Choroidal Melanoma: The Development of a New Microwave Hyperthermia System [Planimetric follow-up of cytomegalovirus retinitis treated with ganciclovir in patients with AIDS]. [Detection of HCMV-DNA in aqueous humor for diagnostic confirmation of viral retinitis]. [Herpes simplex virus retinitis. Role of the immune system in the animal experiment]. [Electro-ophthalmologic studies in HIV patients].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1