Marvell Studies Pub Date : 2020-09-14 DOI:10.16995/MS.45
Patrick J. McGrath
{"title":"Marvell’s Allusions","authors":"Patrick J. McGrath","doi":"10.16995/MS.45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article attempts to define Marvell’s allusions and offers six characteristic features of his allusivity to do so: indirectness, similitude, denaturalization/adaptation, ironic contrast, criticism, and meaningfulness. Based on these features, the article maintains that the allusion is a particularly intellective, intricate, and intentional category of Marvellian intertextuality. It compares these qualities with the Marvellian echo, whose dubious intentionality, greater visibility, and shallower meaning markedly contrast with the allusion. While the moment of readerly recognition frequently exhausts the meaning of an echo, allusions contain depths that readers must laboriously sound. In short, the article attempts to introduce more precision and accuracy into a body of scholarship that frequently treats Marvell’s echoes and allusions as interchangeable.","PeriodicalId":357283,"journal":{"name":"Marvell Studies","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marvell Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16995/MS.45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文试图界定马维尔的典故,并提出其典故的六个特征:间接性、相似性、变性/改编、反讽对比、批评性和意义性。基于这些特点,本文认为,典故是马维尔互文性中一个特别智能、复杂和有意的范畴。它将这些品质与马维尔式的回声进行了比较,后者的意向性可疑,可见性更强,含义更浅,与典故形成鲜明对比。当读者意识到这一点时,往往会耗尽回声的含义,而典故则包含着读者必须费力才能听到的深度。简而言之,本文试图将更多的精确性和准确性引入到经常将马维尔的呼应和典喻视为可互换的学术体系中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Marvell’s Allusions
This article attempts to define Marvell’s allusions and offers six characteristic features of his allusivity to do so: indirectness, similitude, denaturalization/adaptation, ironic contrast, criticism, and meaningfulness. Based on these features, the article maintains that the allusion is a particularly intellective, intricate, and intentional category of Marvellian intertextuality. It compares these qualities with the Marvellian echo, whose dubious intentionality, greater visibility, and shallower meaning markedly contrast with the allusion. While the moment of readerly recognition frequently exhausts the meaning of an echo, allusions contain depths that readers must laboriously sound. In short, the article attempts to introduce more precision and accuracy into a body of scholarship that frequently treats Marvell’s echoes and allusions as interchangeable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hunting the Hunter Confused Tears White tears and Indian slaves in Marvell’s “Mourning” Marvell Against Mourning Andrew Marvell and John Barclay's Satyricon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1