遗传规划的努力估计:不同适应度函数的影响分析

F. Ferrucci, C. Gravino, R. Oliveto, Federica Sarro
{"title":"遗传规划的努力估计:不同适应度函数的影响分析","authors":"F. Ferrucci, C. Gravino, R. Oliveto, Federica Sarro","doi":"10.1109/SSBSE.2010.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: The use of search-based methods has been recently proposed for software development effort estimation and some case studies have been carried out to assess the effectiveness of Genetic Programming (GP). The results reported in the literature showed that GP can provide an estimation accuracy comparable or slightly better than some widely used techniques and encouraged further research to investigate whether varying the fitness function the estimation accuracy can be improved. Aim: Starting from these considerations, in this paper we report on a case study aiming to analyse the role played by some fitness functions for the accuracy of the estimates. Method: We performed a case study based on a publicly available dataset, i.e., Desharnais, by applying a 3-fold cross validation and employing summary measures and statistical tests for the analysis of the results. Moreover, we compared the accuracy of the obtained estimates with those achieved using some widely used estimation methods, namely Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) and Manual Step Wise Regression (MSWR). Results: The obtained results highlight that the fitness function choice significantly affected the estimation accuracy. The results also revealed that GP provided significantly better estimates than CBR and comparable with those of MSWR for the considered dataset.","PeriodicalId":309806,"journal":{"name":"2nd International Symposium on Search Based Software Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"70","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genetic Programming for Effort Estimation: An Analysis of the Impact of Different Fitness Functions\",\"authors\":\"F. Ferrucci, C. Gravino, R. Oliveto, Federica Sarro\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SSBSE.2010.20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Context: The use of search-based methods has been recently proposed for software development effort estimation and some case studies have been carried out to assess the effectiveness of Genetic Programming (GP). The results reported in the literature showed that GP can provide an estimation accuracy comparable or slightly better than some widely used techniques and encouraged further research to investigate whether varying the fitness function the estimation accuracy can be improved. Aim: Starting from these considerations, in this paper we report on a case study aiming to analyse the role played by some fitness functions for the accuracy of the estimates. Method: We performed a case study based on a publicly available dataset, i.e., Desharnais, by applying a 3-fold cross validation and employing summary measures and statistical tests for the analysis of the results. Moreover, we compared the accuracy of the obtained estimates with those achieved using some widely used estimation methods, namely Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) and Manual Step Wise Regression (MSWR). Results: The obtained results highlight that the fitness function choice significantly affected the estimation accuracy. The results also revealed that GP provided significantly better estimates than CBR and comparable with those of MSWR for the considered dataset.\",\"PeriodicalId\":309806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2nd International Symposium on Search Based Software Engineering\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"70\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2nd International Symposium on Search Based Software Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SSBSE.2010.20\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2nd International Symposium on Search Based Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SSBSE.2010.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 70

摘要

背景:基于搜索的方法最近被提出用于软件开发工作量评估,并且已经进行了一些案例研究来评估遗传规划(GP)的有效性。文献报道的结果表明,GP可以提供与一些广泛使用的技术相当或略好的估计精度,并鼓励进一步研究是否改变适应度函数可以提高估计精度。目的:从这些考虑出发,在本文中,我们报告了一个案例研究,旨在分析一些适应度函数对估计精度的作用。方法:基于一个公开可用的数据集,即Desharnais,我们进行了一个案例研究,采用三重交叉验证,并采用汇总测量和统计检验对结果进行分析。此外,我们还将得到的估计精度与一些广泛使用的估计方法(即基于案例的推理(CBR)和手动逐步回归(MSWR))的估计精度进行了比较。结果:得到的结果表明,适应度函数的选择对估计精度有显著影响。结果还表明,对于考虑的数据集,GP提供了比CBR更好的估计,并且与MSWR的估计相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Genetic Programming for Effort Estimation: An Analysis of the Impact of Different Fitness Functions
Context: The use of search-based methods has been recently proposed for software development effort estimation and some case studies have been carried out to assess the effectiveness of Genetic Programming (GP). The results reported in the literature showed that GP can provide an estimation accuracy comparable or slightly better than some widely used techniques and encouraged further research to investigate whether varying the fitness function the estimation accuracy can be improved. Aim: Starting from these considerations, in this paper we report on a case study aiming to analyse the role played by some fitness functions for the accuracy of the estimates. Method: We performed a case study based on a publicly available dataset, i.e., Desharnais, by applying a 3-fold cross validation and employing summary measures and statistical tests for the analysis of the results. Moreover, we compared the accuracy of the obtained estimates with those achieved using some widely used estimation methods, namely Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) and Manual Step Wise Regression (MSWR). Results: The obtained results highlight that the fitness function choice significantly affected the estimation accuracy. The results also revealed that GP provided significantly better estimates than CBR and comparable with those of MSWR for the considered dataset.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using Search Methods for Selecting and Combining Software Sensors to Improve Fault Detection in Autonomic Systems AUSTIN: A Tool for Search Based Software Testing for the C Language and Its Evaluation on Deployed Automotive Systems Ant Colony Optimization for the Next Release Problem: A Comparative Study Search-based Resource Scheduling for Bug Fixing Tasks Test Case Selection Method for Emergency Changes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1