彭家南的收益比指数达拉姆彭家南的财务报表舞弊

Nurul Sa'adah Sarumpaet, K. K
{"title":"彭家南的收益比指数达拉姆彭家南的财务报表舞弊","authors":"Nurul Sa'adah Sarumpaet, K. K","doi":"10.31851/neraca.v5i2.6531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conducted to determine: 1) Percentage of manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2017-2019 that are classified as manipulators; 2) Percentage of manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2017-2019 that are classified as nonmanipulators; 3) Percentage of manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2017-2019 that are classified as gray companies. Methods of data collection using the method of documentation. Methods of data analysis with quantitative descriptive using the ratio proposed by Messod D. Beneish. The results of the study conclude 1) In 2017 there were 5.89% of companies classified as manipulators. While in 2018 and 2019 there were no manipulators companies. 2) In 2017 there were 52.94%, in 2018 there were 41.17%, in 2019 there were 70.59% of the total sample companies classified as non-manipulators. 3) In 2017 there were 41.17%, in 2018 there were 58.83%, in 2019 there were 29.41% of the total sample companies classified as gray companies.","PeriodicalId":128935,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Neraca: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Ekonomi Akuntansi","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PENGGUNAAN BENEISH RATIO INDEX DALAM PENDETEKSIAN FINANCIAL STATEMENT FRAUD\",\"authors\":\"Nurul Sa'adah Sarumpaet, K. K\",\"doi\":\"10.31851/neraca.v5i2.6531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study was conducted to determine: 1) Percentage of manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2017-2019 that are classified as manipulators; 2) Percentage of manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2017-2019 that are classified as nonmanipulators; 3) Percentage of manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2017-2019 that are classified as gray companies. Methods of data collection using the method of documentation. Methods of data analysis with quantitative descriptive using the ratio proposed by Messod D. Beneish. The results of the study conclude 1) In 2017 there were 5.89% of companies classified as manipulators. While in 2018 and 2019 there were no manipulators companies. 2) In 2017 there were 52.94%, in 2018 there were 41.17%, in 2019 there were 70.59% of the total sample companies classified as non-manipulators. 3) In 2017 there were 41.17%, in 2018 there were 58.83%, in 2019 there were 29.41% of the total sample companies classified as gray companies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":128935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Neraca: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Ekonomi Akuntansi\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Neraca: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Ekonomi Akuntansi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31851/neraca.v5i2.6531\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Neraca: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Ekonomi Akuntansi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31851/neraca.v5i2.6531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究旨在确定:1)2017-2019年在印度尼西亚证券交易所上市的制造业公司被归类为操纵者的百分比;2) 2017-2019年在印尼证券交易所上市的制造业公司中被归类为非操纵者的百分比;3) 2017-2019年在印尼证券交易所上市的制造业公司被归类为灰色公司的百分比。采用文献法收集数据的方法。采用Messod D. Beneish提出的比率进行定量描述的数据分析方法。研究结果表明:1)2017年,5.89%的公司被归类为操纵者。而在2018年和2019年,没有操纵公司。2) 2017年为52.94%,2018年为41.17%,2019年为70.59%的样本公司被归类为非操纵者。3) 2017年为41.17%,2018年为58.83%,2019年有29.41%的样本公司被归类为灰色公司。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PENGGUNAAN BENEISH RATIO INDEX DALAM PENDETEKSIAN FINANCIAL STATEMENT FRAUD
This study was conducted to determine: 1) Percentage of manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2017-2019 that are classified as manipulators; 2) Percentage of manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2017-2019 that are classified as nonmanipulators; 3) Percentage of manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2017-2019 that are classified as gray companies. Methods of data collection using the method of documentation. Methods of data analysis with quantitative descriptive using the ratio proposed by Messod D. Beneish. The results of the study conclude 1) In 2017 there were 5.89% of companies classified as manipulators. While in 2018 and 2019 there were no manipulators companies. 2) In 2017 there were 52.94%, in 2018 there were 41.17%, in 2019 there were 70.59% of the total sample companies classified as non-manipulators. 3) In 2017 there were 41.17%, in 2018 there were 58.83%, in 2019 there were 29.41% of the total sample companies classified as gray companies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pembelajaran Manajemen yang Mendidik dan Inovatif sebagai Media Motivasi Mahasiswa dalam Kewirausahaan Pengaruh Self Regulated Learning dan Intensitas Pemberian Tugas terhadap Hasil Belajar Akuntansi dengan Pemediasi Academic Stress Analisis Rasio Return On Asset (ROA) Pada Bank Mandiri Determinan Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi dalam Pemenuhan Kewajiban Perpajakan Pengaruh Status Sosial Ekonomi Orang Tua dan Literasi Ekonomi Terhadap Perilaku Konsumtif
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1