热电、热离子和热光伏能量转换

Ali Shakouri
{"title":"热电、热离子和热光伏能量转换","authors":"Ali Shakouri","doi":"10.1109/ICT.2005.1519994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Key characteristics of thermoelectric, ballistic thermionic and quasi diffusive thermionic energy converters are compared. First, the main assumptions used to derive the linear Boltzmann transport equations for electrons are examined and the possibility that a higher order transport coefficient may become relevant is discussed. In the linear transport regime, there is a fundamental trade off between high Seebeck coefficient and high electrical conductivity for bulk materials and for many multilayer structures due to the interplay between electronic density-of-states (DOS) and electron group velocity and also due to the shape of DOS versus energy curve deep inside a band. While low dimensional structures alter the density-of-states, a similar trade off still exists. If large barrier heights and high doping concentrations could be achieved solid-state thermionic energy converters would be able to alleviate this trade off, thereby achieving a very high thermoelectric power factor. For this to occur, the electron transverse momentum perpendicular to heterostructure barriers must not be conserved. This can be achieved with non-planar structures or with embedded nanostructures. Finally, a comparison between thermoelectric/thermionic devices and thermophotovoltaic energy converters shows a difference in the average energy of the emitted hot carriers due to the difference between electronic and photonic density-of-states in the reservoirs. The use of both electrons and photons from a hot reservoir or the engineering of the reservoir density-of-states may provide additional means to achieve higher efficiency in energy conversion devices and to approach the limit given by the entropy generation more easily.","PeriodicalId":422400,"journal":{"name":"ICT 2005. 24th International Conference on Thermoelectrics, 2005.","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thermoelectric, thermionic and thermophotovoltaic energy conversion\",\"authors\":\"Ali Shakouri\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICT.2005.1519994\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Key characteristics of thermoelectric, ballistic thermionic and quasi diffusive thermionic energy converters are compared. First, the main assumptions used to derive the linear Boltzmann transport equations for electrons are examined and the possibility that a higher order transport coefficient may become relevant is discussed. In the linear transport regime, there is a fundamental trade off between high Seebeck coefficient and high electrical conductivity for bulk materials and for many multilayer structures due to the interplay between electronic density-of-states (DOS) and electron group velocity and also due to the shape of DOS versus energy curve deep inside a band. While low dimensional structures alter the density-of-states, a similar trade off still exists. If large barrier heights and high doping concentrations could be achieved solid-state thermionic energy converters would be able to alleviate this trade off, thereby achieving a very high thermoelectric power factor. For this to occur, the electron transverse momentum perpendicular to heterostructure barriers must not be conserved. This can be achieved with non-planar structures or with embedded nanostructures. Finally, a comparison between thermoelectric/thermionic devices and thermophotovoltaic energy converters shows a difference in the average energy of the emitted hot carriers due to the difference between electronic and photonic density-of-states in the reservoirs. The use of both electrons and photons from a hot reservoir or the engineering of the reservoir density-of-states may provide additional means to achieve higher efficiency in energy conversion devices and to approach the limit given by the entropy generation more easily.\",\"PeriodicalId\":422400,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ICT 2005. 24th International Conference on Thermoelectrics, 2005.\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ICT 2005. 24th International Conference on Thermoelectrics, 2005.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICT.2005.1519994\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ICT 2005. 24th International Conference on Thermoelectrics, 2005.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICT.2005.1519994","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

比较了热电、弹道热离子和准扩散热离子能量转换器的主要特性。首先,研究了用于推导电子线性玻尔兹曼输运方程的主要假设,并讨论了高阶输运系数可能成为相关的可能性。在线性输运体系中,由于电子态密度(DOS)和电子群速度之间的相互作用,以及DOS与能带深处能量曲线的形状,块状材料和许多多层结构的高塞贝克系数和高导电性之间存在着基本的权衡。虽然低维结构改变了态密度,但类似的权衡仍然存在。如果能够实现大的势垒高度和高掺杂浓度,固态热电子能量转换器将能够减轻这种权衡,从而实现非常高的热电功率因数。为了使这种情况发生,垂直于异质结构势垒的电子横向动量必须不守恒。这可以通过非平面结构或嵌入纳米结构来实现。最后,热电/热离子器件与热光伏能量转换器之间的比较表明,由于储层中电子和光子态密度的差异,发射的热载流子的平均能量存在差异。利用来自热热源的电子和光子,或者对热源的态密度进行工程设计,可以提供额外的手段来实现能量转换装置的更高效率,并更容易接近熵产生所给出的极限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Thermoelectric, thermionic and thermophotovoltaic energy conversion
Key characteristics of thermoelectric, ballistic thermionic and quasi diffusive thermionic energy converters are compared. First, the main assumptions used to derive the linear Boltzmann transport equations for electrons are examined and the possibility that a higher order transport coefficient may become relevant is discussed. In the linear transport regime, there is a fundamental trade off between high Seebeck coefficient and high electrical conductivity for bulk materials and for many multilayer structures due to the interplay between electronic density-of-states (DOS) and electron group velocity and also due to the shape of DOS versus energy curve deep inside a band. While low dimensional structures alter the density-of-states, a similar trade off still exists. If large barrier heights and high doping concentrations could be achieved solid-state thermionic energy converters would be able to alleviate this trade off, thereby achieving a very high thermoelectric power factor. For this to occur, the electron transverse momentum perpendicular to heterostructure barriers must not be conserved. This can be achieved with non-planar structures or with embedded nanostructures. Finally, a comparison between thermoelectric/thermionic devices and thermophotovoltaic energy converters shows a difference in the average energy of the emitted hot carriers due to the difference between electronic and photonic density-of-states in the reservoirs. The use of both electrons and photons from a hot reservoir or the engineering of the reservoir density-of-states may provide additional means to achieve higher efficiency in energy conversion devices and to approach the limit given by the entropy generation more easily.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Microstructure and high-temperature thermoelectric properties of Cu-doped NaCo/sub 2/O/sub 4/ Comparison of skutterudites and advanced thin-film B/sub 4/C/B/sub 9/C and Si/SiGe materials in advanced thermoelectric energy recovery systems Research on the novel high-intensity thermoelectric generator and its application on HEV Evaluation of monolithic and segmented thermoelectric materials using a potentiometer-type high accuracy generator test facility Comparison of structural parameters for Zn/sub 4-x/Cd/sub x/Sb/sub 3/ compounds analyzed by the Rietveld method using two crystallographic models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1