{"title":"咬合垂直尺寸:两种头影测量方法的比较","authors":"Rodrigo Quiroga-del Pozo , Marcial Sierra-Fuentes , Julieta del Pozo-Bassi , Rodrigo Quiroga-Aravena","doi":"10.1016/j.piro.2016.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to compare the Occlusal Vertical Dimension (OVD) determined with the “Knebelman Craniometric method” and with the “Willis method” on the same patient.</p></div><div><h3>Material and method</h3><p>The study was conducted on a sample of 74 subjects with their full dentition. The mean age was, They were students of fourth year, with a mean age of 22 years<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.99, from the Faculty of Dentistry at Mayor University. The measurement instruments used were the Knebelman Craniometer and the Willis Device. They were used according to the methodology recommended by their manufacturers. The results were analysed using the Paired T-test, with the OVD determined by each method expressed in millimetres.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>No significant differences were found when comparing the OVD determined using the Knebelman Craniometer and the Willis Device on the same patient (mean difference of 0.7<!--> <!-->mm between both methods).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There were no significant statistical or clinical differences between both studied instruments. In this context complementing with both instruments, the Knebelman Craniometer and the Willis Device, could be a valuable tool to fine-tune and simplify the measurement of OVD in edentulous patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21203,"journal":{"name":"Revista clínica de periodoncia, implantología y rehabilitación oral","volume":"9 3","pages":"Pages 264-270"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.piro.2016.09.002","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dimensión vertical oclusal: comparación de 2 métodos cefalométricos\",\"authors\":\"Rodrigo Quiroga-del Pozo , Marcial Sierra-Fuentes , Julieta del Pozo-Bassi , Rodrigo Quiroga-Aravena\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.piro.2016.09.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to compare the Occlusal Vertical Dimension (OVD) determined with the “Knebelman Craniometric method” and with the “Willis method” on the same patient.</p></div><div><h3>Material and method</h3><p>The study was conducted on a sample of 74 subjects with their full dentition. The mean age was, They were students of fourth year, with a mean age of 22 years<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.99, from the Faculty of Dentistry at Mayor University. The measurement instruments used were the Knebelman Craniometer and the Willis Device. They were used according to the methodology recommended by their manufacturers. The results were analysed using the Paired T-test, with the OVD determined by each method expressed in millimetres.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>No significant differences were found when comparing the OVD determined using the Knebelman Craniometer and the Willis Device on the same patient (mean difference of 0.7<!--> <!-->mm between both methods).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There were no significant statistical or clinical differences between both studied instruments. In this context complementing with both instruments, the Knebelman Craniometer and the Willis Device, could be a valuable tool to fine-tune and simplify the measurement of OVD in edentulous patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista clínica de periodoncia, implantología y rehabilitación oral\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 264-270\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.piro.2016.09.002\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista clínica de periodoncia, implantología y rehabilitación oral\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0718539116300441\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista clínica de periodoncia, implantología y rehabilitación oral","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0718539116300441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Dimensión vertical oclusal: comparación de 2 métodos cefalométricos
Objective
The purpose of this study was to compare the Occlusal Vertical Dimension (OVD) determined with the “Knebelman Craniometric method” and with the “Willis method” on the same patient.
Material and method
The study was conducted on a sample of 74 subjects with their full dentition. The mean age was, They were students of fourth year, with a mean age of 22 years ± 0.99, from the Faculty of Dentistry at Mayor University. The measurement instruments used were the Knebelman Craniometer and the Willis Device. They were used according to the methodology recommended by their manufacturers. The results were analysed using the Paired T-test, with the OVD determined by each method expressed in millimetres.
Results
No significant differences were found when comparing the OVD determined using the Knebelman Craniometer and the Willis Device on the same patient (mean difference of 0.7 mm between both methods).
Conclusion
There were no significant statistical or clinical differences between both studied instruments. In this context complementing with both instruments, the Knebelman Craniometer and the Willis Device, could be a valuable tool to fine-tune and simplify the measurement of OVD in edentulous patients.