交流电路分析课程实验教学的比较评价

M. Mehrubeoglu, F. Attarzadeh, D. Gurkan
{"title":"交流电路分析课程实验教学的比较评价","authors":"M. Mehrubeoglu, F. Attarzadeh, D. Gurkan","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2009.5350432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The AC Circuit Analysis course is a requirement for electrical engineering and electrical engineering technology curricula. In the traditional teaching method, concepts are introduced during lectures. The students conduct experiments to observe these concepts during laboratory. Recently, new techniques based on the CLABS model developed at University of Houston (UH) that rely on real-world problem-based laboratory experiments have been adopted at Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi (TAMU-CC). In this paper, a direct comparison between the traditional method and the new CLABS method within one class at TAMU-CC is reported. The results obtained at UH are presented for a comparative evaluation. The results from TAMU-CC show that CLABS experiments are perceived to have a higher learning impact in new practical applications. Results obtained at UH show high student satisfaction in most aspects of the CLABS pedagogy. This work also revealed challenges in within-class comparative studies.","PeriodicalId":129330,"journal":{"name":"2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of laboratory teaching in an AC Circuit Analysis course\",\"authors\":\"M. Mehrubeoglu, F. Attarzadeh, D. Gurkan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FIE.2009.5350432\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The AC Circuit Analysis course is a requirement for electrical engineering and electrical engineering technology curricula. In the traditional teaching method, concepts are introduced during lectures. The students conduct experiments to observe these concepts during laboratory. Recently, new techniques based on the CLABS model developed at University of Houston (UH) that rely on real-world problem-based laboratory experiments have been adopted at Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi (TAMU-CC). In this paper, a direct comparison between the traditional method and the new CLABS method within one class at TAMU-CC is reported. The results obtained at UH are presented for a comparative evaluation. The results from TAMU-CC show that CLABS experiments are perceived to have a higher learning impact in new practical applications. Results obtained at UH show high student satisfaction in most aspects of the CLABS pedagogy. This work also revealed challenges in within-class comparative studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2009.5350432\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2009.5350432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

交流电路分析课程是电气工程和电气工程技术课程的必修课程。在传统的教学方法中,概念是在讲座中介绍的。学生在实验中通过实验来观察这些概念。最近,德克萨斯农工大学科珀斯克里斯蒂分校(TAMU-CC)采用了基于休斯顿大学(UH)开发的CLABS模型的新技术,该模型依赖于基于现实世界问题的实验室实验。本文报道了TAMU-CC一个班级的传统方法与新的CLABS方法的直接比较。在休斯敦大学获得的结果提出了一个比较评价。TAMU-CC的结果表明,CLABS实验在新的实际应用中被认为具有更高的学习影响。在俄亥俄大学获得的结果显示,学生对CLABS教学法的大多数方面都很满意。这项工作也揭示了班级内比较研究的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative evaluation of laboratory teaching in an AC Circuit Analysis course
The AC Circuit Analysis course is a requirement for electrical engineering and electrical engineering technology curricula. In the traditional teaching method, concepts are introduced during lectures. The students conduct experiments to observe these concepts during laboratory. Recently, new techniques based on the CLABS model developed at University of Houston (UH) that rely on real-world problem-based laboratory experiments have been adopted at Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi (TAMU-CC). In this paper, a direct comparison between the traditional method and the new CLABS method within one class at TAMU-CC is reported. The results obtained at UH are presented for a comparative evaluation. The results from TAMU-CC show that CLABS experiments are perceived to have a higher learning impact in new practical applications. Results obtained at UH show high student satisfaction in most aspects of the CLABS pedagogy. This work also revealed challenges in within-class comparative studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Work in progress - use of a system for evaluation of learning and formative feedback in fluid mechanics Special session - developing engineering student's philosophical inquiry skills The business of Service Learning Work in progress: iComb Project - a mathematical widget for teaching and learning combinatorics through exercises Work in progress - integrating energy issues and technologies into an electrical or computer engineering curriculum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1