薪酬中性别歧视的法律、伦理和战略含义:在同工同酬法案失败的地方,公平薪酬法案能否成功?

Catherine C. Giapponi, S. McEvoy
{"title":"薪酬中性别歧视的法律、伦理和战略含义:在同工同酬法案失败的地方,公平薪酬法案能否成功?","authors":"Catherine C. Giapponi, S. McEvoy","doi":"10.2190/8733-70W7-3576-6823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the fact that the Equal Pay Act has been law since 1963, women’s pay lags behind men’s at every occupational level. Congress is now considering bills, like the Fair Pay Act and the Paycheck Fairness Act, to remedy salary inequities. This article explores the topic of pay equity as it relates to gender discrimination and provides a review of the research and literature related to the gender pay gap issue. The authors argue that the enforcement of existing law offers more promise in ameliorating pay disparities than does the proposed Fair Pay Act. The authors further contend that there are barriers to change, including social and cultural factors, which have limited the reach and effectiveness of the law in reducing the gender pay disparity. In April 2005, Senator Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) introduced the Fair Pay Act of 2005 to address pay difference between white men and women and minorities [1]. The legislation “would address the historic pattern of undervaluating and underpaying so-called women’s jobs” [2]. The bill says that “where working conditions are similar, wages should also be similar” [2].The proposed legislation seeks to address the gender wage-gap issue that has plagued the workplace for decades. Gender-based wage disparity continues to spark discussion, research, and proposals for remedy. A national group, Business and Professional Women USA,","PeriodicalId":371129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Individual Employment Rights","volume":"56 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Legal, Ethical, and Strategic Implications of Gender Discrimination in Compensation: Can the Fair Pay Act Succeed Where the Equal Pay Act has Failed?\",\"authors\":\"Catherine C. Giapponi, S. McEvoy\",\"doi\":\"10.2190/8733-70W7-3576-6823\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite the fact that the Equal Pay Act has been law since 1963, women’s pay lags behind men’s at every occupational level. Congress is now considering bills, like the Fair Pay Act and the Paycheck Fairness Act, to remedy salary inequities. This article explores the topic of pay equity as it relates to gender discrimination and provides a review of the research and literature related to the gender pay gap issue. The authors argue that the enforcement of existing law offers more promise in ameliorating pay disparities than does the proposed Fair Pay Act. The authors further contend that there are barriers to change, including social and cultural factors, which have limited the reach and effectiveness of the law in reducing the gender pay disparity. In April 2005, Senator Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) introduced the Fair Pay Act of 2005 to address pay difference between white men and women and minorities [1]. The legislation “would address the historic pattern of undervaluating and underpaying so-called women’s jobs” [2]. The bill says that “where working conditions are similar, wages should also be similar” [2].The proposed legislation seeks to address the gender wage-gap issue that has plagued the workplace for decades. Gender-based wage disparity continues to spark discussion, research, and proposals for remedy. A national group, Business and Professional Women USA,\",\"PeriodicalId\":371129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Individual Employment Rights\",\"volume\":\"56 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Individual Employment Rights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2190/8733-70W7-3576-6823\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Individual Employment Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2190/8733-70W7-3576-6823","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

尽管《同工同酬法》(Equal Pay Act)自1963年以来就已成为法律,但在各个职业级别,女性的薪酬都落后于男性。国会目前正在考虑法案,如《公平薪酬法案》和《工资公平法案》,以纠正工资不平等。本文探讨了与性别歧视相关的薪酬平等问题,并对与性别薪酬差距问题相关的研究和文献进行了综述。作者认为,在改善薪酬差距方面,执行现有法律比拟议中的《公平薪酬法》更有希望。作者进一步认为,有一些阻碍变革的因素,包括社会和文化因素,限制了法律在减少男女薪酬差距方面的覆盖面和效力。2005年4月,爱荷华州民主党参议员汤姆·哈金(Tom Harkin)提出了《2005年公平薪酬法案》(Fair Pay Act of 2005),以解决白人男女和少数族裔之间的薪酬差异问题[1]。这项立法“将解决所谓女性工作被低估和报酬过低的历史模式”[2]。该法案称“工作条件相似的地方,工资也应该相似”[2]。这项立法提案旨在解决困扰职场数十年的性别工资差距问题。基于性别的工资差距继续引发讨论、研究和补救建议。一个全国性的组织,美国商业和职业女性,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Legal, Ethical, and Strategic Implications of Gender Discrimination in Compensation: Can the Fair Pay Act Succeed Where the Equal Pay Act has Failed?
Despite the fact that the Equal Pay Act has been law since 1963, women’s pay lags behind men’s at every occupational level. Congress is now considering bills, like the Fair Pay Act and the Paycheck Fairness Act, to remedy salary inequities. This article explores the topic of pay equity as it relates to gender discrimination and provides a review of the research and literature related to the gender pay gap issue. The authors argue that the enforcement of existing law offers more promise in ameliorating pay disparities than does the proposed Fair Pay Act. The authors further contend that there are barriers to change, including social and cultural factors, which have limited the reach and effectiveness of the law in reducing the gender pay disparity. In April 2005, Senator Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) introduced the Fair Pay Act of 2005 to address pay difference between white men and women and minorities [1]. The legislation “would address the historic pattern of undervaluating and underpaying so-called women’s jobs” [2]. The bill says that “where working conditions are similar, wages should also be similar” [2].The proposed legislation seeks to address the gender wage-gap issue that has plagued the workplace for decades. Gender-based wage disparity continues to spark discussion, research, and proposals for remedy. A national group, Business and Professional Women USA,
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Navigating the Land Mines of the Family and Medical Leave Act Dress and Grooming Standards: How Legal are They? EQUAL PAY ACT CASES IN HIGHER EDUCATION Disparate Impact Discrimination and the ADEA: Coming of Age Disciplining Employees for Free Speech, Whistle Blowing, and Political Activities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1