扩大离婚诉讼中的吉娜意义(宗教法庭判例1538/Pdt.G/2013/PA.Tgrs)

Umar Haris Sanjaya
{"title":"扩大离婚诉讼中的吉娜意义(宗教法庭判例1538/Pdt.G/2013/PA.Tgrs)","authors":"Umar Haris Sanjaya","doi":"10.35334/AY.V1I2.175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study focused on discussing the meaning of zina laws that existed at the Compilation of Islamic Law and Government Regulation No. 9 Year 1975 on the implementation of Law No. 1 Year 1974 on Marriage, which the courts in applying the word adultery should also look at the changing patterns of behavior and adultery today. Adultery should no longer be defined as sexual intercourse with the entry of male into the female sex, but the behavior of adultery was bermcam-wide one is oral sex. Behavior oral sex is a matter of a lawsuit against a husband and wife on the grounds of adultery lawsuit, but the court rejected it. This study contains the problem is how judges interpret the word adultery in making judgments in divorce? whether oral sex can be classified into the word adultery? The study found that oral sex by law can not be regarded as adultery, but the act of adultery into. Proof of adultery can only be recognized when the entity relationship entry into the male female sex. In conclusion, the judges interpret the meaning of the word adultery adultery per se, but the behavior of adultery are now widely different patterns and actions. Justice should not only look at the regulations simply make judgments, but look at the pattern of behavior or adultery committed in defining the word adultery.Keywords: adultery, oral sex, meaning law","PeriodicalId":322454,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL AKTA YUDISIA","volume":"51 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MEMPERLUAS MAKNA ZINA DALAM GUGATAN PERCERAIAN (Studi kasus putusan Pengadilan Agama Tigaraksa No. 1538/Pdt.G/2013/PA.Tgrs)\",\"authors\":\"Umar Haris Sanjaya\",\"doi\":\"10.35334/AY.V1I2.175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This study focused on discussing the meaning of zina laws that existed at the Compilation of Islamic Law and Government Regulation No. 9 Year 1975 on the implementation of Law No. 1 Year 1974 on Marriage, which the courts in applying the word adultery should also look at the changing patterns of behavior and adultery today. Adultery should no longer be defined as sexual intercourse with the entry of male into the female sex, but the behavior of adultery was bermcam-wide one is oral sex. Behavior oral sex is a matter of a lawsuit against a husband and wife on the grounds of adultery lawsuit, but the court rejected it. This study contains the problem is how judges interpret the word adultery in making judgments in divorce? whether oral sex can be classified into the word adultery? The study found that oral sex by law can not be regarded as adultery, but the act of adultery into. Proof of adultery can only be recognized when the entity relationship entry into the male female sex. In conclusion, the judges interpret the meaning of the word adultery adultery per se, but the behavior of adultery are now widely different patterns and actions. Justice should not only look at the regulations simply make judgments, but look at the pattern of behavior or adultery committed in defining the word adultery.Keywords: adultery, oral sex, meaning law\",\"PeriodicalId\":322454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JURNAL AKTA YUDISIA\",\"volume\":\"51 3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JURNAL AKTA YUDISIA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35334/AY.V1I2.175\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURNAL AKTA YUDISIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35334/AY.V1I2.175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本文着重讨论了1975年《伊斯兰教法汇编》和1975年《关于实施1974年《婚姻法》的第9号政府条例》中存在的“奸淫法”的含义,法院在应用“奸淫”一词时也应考虑到当今行为模式和通奸行为的变化。通奸不应该再被定义为男性进入女性的性行为,但通奸的行为是全面性的口交。口交行为本来是夫妻之间以通奸为由提起的诉讼,但法院驳回了这一诉讼。这个研究包含的问题是法官在离婚判决中如何解释通奸这个词?口交是否可以归为通奸?研究发现,口交不能被法律视为通奸,而是通奸的行为。通奸的证据只有在实体关系进入男女两性时才能被认定。综上所述,法官们解释了通奸这个词的含义通奸本身,但通奸的行为现在有了很大不同的模式和行为。司法不应该只看条例简单地作出判断,而应该看犯奸淫的行为模式来界定奸淫一词。关键词:通奸,口交,意义法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MEMPERLUAS MAKNA ZINA DALAM GUGATAN PERCERAIAN (Studi kasus putusan Pengadilan Agama Tigaraksa No. 1538/Pdt.G/2013/PA.Tgrs)
Abstract This study focused on discussing the meaning of zina laws that existed at the Compilation of Islamic Law and Government Regulation No. 9 Year 1975 on the implementation of Law No. 1 Year 1974 on Marriage, which the courts in applying the word adultery should also look at the changing patterns of behavior and adultery today. Adultery should no longer be defined as sexual intercourse with the entry of male into the female sex, but the behavior of adultery was bermcam-wide one is oral sex. Behavior oral sex is a matter of a lawsuit against a husband and wife on the grounds of adultery lawsuit, but the court rejected it. This study contains the problem is how judges interpret the word adultery in making judgments in divorce? whether oral sex can be classified into the word adultery? The study found that oral sex by law can not be regarded as adultery, but the act of adultery into. Proof of adultery can only be recognized when the entity relationship entry into the male female sex. In conclusion, the judges interpret the meaning of the word adultery adultery per se, but the behavior of adultery are now widely different patterns and actions. Justice should not only look at the regulations simply make judgments, but look at the pattern of behavior or adultery committed in defining the word adultery.Keywords: adultery, oral sex, meaning law
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EKSISTENSI PERJANJIAN ELEKTRONIK SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI DALAM HUKUM ACARA PERDATA PENGAWASAN OMBUDSMAN TERHADAP PENYELENGGARAAN PELAYANAN PUBLIK PADA MASA PANDEMI CORONA VIRUS DISEASE 2019 (COVID-19) TANGGUNGJAWAB HUKUM USAHA KLINIK KESEHATAN DI KOTA TARAKAN TERHADAP SEGALA RESIKO USAHA BENTUK KETERBUKAAN RAHASIA MEDIS DALAM SITUASI PANDEMI VIRUS COVID 19 DI INDONESIA ASPEK HUKUM LABORATORIUM FORENSIK KEIMIGRASIAN: STUDI KASUS PEMERIKSAAN PASPOR PALSU KEBANGSAAN INGGRIS ATAS NAMA ABBAS TAUQEER
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1