走向神化:突尼斯资讯社会议程的解构

Roy Balleste
{"title":"走向神化:突尼斯资讯社会议程的解构","authors":"Roy Balleste","doi":"10.5195/TLP.2012.95","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Tunis Agenda for the Information Society belongs in the realm of the few, but very important documents, that promote human reason, human rights and international law. Human rights concepts may be identified within the document as a social achievement of progression toward a common good. This progression toward an apotheosis represents a reminder that the world community must apply human rights standards to any accepted model for the management of the Internet, and yet, as we examine the entire \"social process\" and potential obstacles to the realization of the goals enshrined in the Tunis Agenda, we uncover the root of its message. These obstacles, within the Tunis Agenda, must be tackled within the context of a \"geographical, political, religious, or intellectual\" divide, and must be addressed as challenges, that impede the \"path of human interaction\" toward the effective \"imagination of alternatives\" and the potential for the arrangement of a workable road map that aims at approximating \"a public order of human dignity, maximizing access to all things humans value.\"","PeriodicalId":185385,"journal":{"name":"Pittsburgh Journal of Technology Law & Policy","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"58","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RISING TOWARD APOTHEOSIS: THE DECONSTRUCTION OF THE WSIS TUNIS AGENDA FOR THE INFORMATION SOCIETY\",\"authors\":\"Roy Balleste\",\"doi\":\"10.5195/TLP.2012.95\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Tunis Agenda for the Information Society belongs in the realm of the few, but very important documents, that promote human reason, human rights and international law. Human rights concepts may be identified within the document as a social achievement of progression toward a common good. This progression toward an apotheosis represents a reminder that the world community must apply human rights standards to any accepted model for the management of the Internet, and yet, as we examine the entire \\\"social process\\\" and potential obstacles to the realization of the goals enshrined in the Tunis Agenda, we uncover the root of its message. These obstacles, within the Tunis Agenda, must be tackled within the context of a \\\"geographical, political, religious, or intellectual\\\" divide, and must be addressed as challenges, that impede the \\\"path of human interaction\\\" toward the effective \\\"imagination of alternatives\\\" and the potential for the arrangement of a workable road map that aims at approximating \\\"a public order of human dignity, maximizing access to all things humans value.\\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":185385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pittsburgh Journal of Technology Law & Policy\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"58\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pittsburgh Journal of Technology Law & Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5195/TLP.2012.95\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pittsburgh Journal of Technology Law & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/TLP.2012.95","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 58

摘要

《突尼斯信息社会议程》属于少数但非常重要的文件,它促进了人类理性、人权和国际法。人权概念可以在文件中确定为朝着共同利益前进的一项社会成就。这一走向典范的进程提醒我们,国际社会必须将人权标准应用于任何公认的互联网管理模式,然而,当我们审视整个“社会进程”和实现《突尼斯议程》所载目标的潜在障碍时,我们发现了其信息的根源。在《突尼斯议程》中,这些障碍必须在“地理、政治、宗教或知识”分歧的背景下加以解决,必须作为挑战加以解决,因为它们阻碍了通往有效的“替代方案想象”的“人类互动之路”,阻碍了安排可行路线图的潜力,该路线图旨在接近“人类尊严的公共秩序,最大限度地获得人类所重视的一切”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
RISING TOWARD APOTHEOSIS: THE DECONSTRUCTION OF THE WSIS TUNIS AGENDA FOR THE INFORMATION SOCIETY
The Tunis Agenda for the Information Society belongs in the realm of the few, but very important documents, that promote human reason, human rights and international law. Human rights concepts may be identified within the document as a social achievement of progression toward a common good. This progression toward an apotheosis represents a reminder that the world community must apply human rights standards to any accepted model for the management of the Internet, and yet, as we examine the entire "social process" and potential obstacles to the realization of the goals enshrined in the Tunis Agenda, we uncover the root of its message. These obstacles, within the Tunis Agenda, must be tackled within the context of a "geographical, political, religious, or intellectual" divide, and must be addressed as challenges, that impede the "path of human interaction" toward the effective "imagination of alternatives" and the potential for the arrangement of a workable road map that aims at approximating "a public order of human dignity, maximizing access to all things humans value."
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
For Profit or For Health? It is Time to Reckon With the Current Pharmaceutical Landscape Through a Systematic Analysis of Monoclonal Anitbodies The Use of Race in Medical Artificial Intelligence Me-FAS, You-FAS, We All Eat PFAS: What To Do About the Forever Chemical Patent Eligibility: Exploring the Intersection Between Patent Law and Biomedical Data Biometric Monitoring Devices: Modern Solutions to Protecting Athletes’ Data Privacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1