TROD:从电气数据中心到光学数据中心的演变

Peirui Cao, Shizhen Zhao, Min Yee Teh, Yunzhuo Liu, Xinbing Wang
{"title":"TROD:从电气数据中心到光学数据中心的演变","authors":"Peirui Cao, Shizhen Zhao, Min Yee Teh, Yunzhuo Liu, Xinbing Wang","doi":"10.1109/ICNP52444.2021.9651977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the bandwidth scaling limit of electrical switching and the high cost of building Clos data center networks (DCNs), the adoption of optical DCNs is still limited. There are two reasons. First, existing optical DCN designs usually face tremendous deployment complexity. Second, these designs are not full-optical and the performance benefit against the non-blocking Clos DCN is not clear.After exploring the design tradeoffs of the existing optical DCN designs, we propose TROD (Threshold Routing based Optical Datacenter), a low-complexity optical DCN with superior performance than other optical DCNs. There are two novel designs in TROD that contribute to its success. First, TROD performs robust topology optimization based on the recurring traffic patterns and thus does not need to react to every traffic change, which lowers deployment and management complexity. Second, TROD introduces tVLB (threshold-based VLB), which can avoid network congestion as much as possible even under unexpected traffic bursts. We conduct simulation based on both Facebook’s real DCN traces and our synthesized highly bursty DCN traces. TROD reduces flow completion time (FCT) by at least 2× compared with the existing optical DCN designs, and by approximately 2.4-3.2× compared with expander graph DCN. Compared with the non-blocking Clos, TROD reduces the hop count of the majority packets by one, and could even outperform the non-blocking Clos with proper bandwidth over-provision at the optical layer. Note that TROD can be built with commercially available hardware and does not require host modifications.","PeriodicalId":343813,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE 29th International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TROD: Evolving From Electrical Data Center to Optical Data Center\",\"authors\":\"Peirui Cao, Shizhen Zhao, Min Yee Teh, Yunzhuo Liu, Xinbing Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICNP52444.2021.9651977\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite the bandwidth scaling limit of electrical switching and the high cost of building Clos data center networks (DCNs), the adoption of optical DCNs is still limited. There are two reasons. First, existing optical DCN designs usually face tremendous deployment complexity. Second, these designs are not full-optical and the performance benefit against the non-blocking Clos DCN is not clear.After exploring the design tradeoffs of the existing optical DCN designs, we propose TROD (Threshold Routing based Optical Datacenter), a low-complexity optical DCN with superior performance than other optical DCNs. There are two novel designs in TROD that contribute to its success. First, TROD performs robust topology optimization based on the recurring traffic patterns and thus does not need to react to every traffic change, which lowers deployment and management complexity. Second, TROD introduces tVLB (threshold-based VLB), which can avoid network congestion as much as possible even under unexpected traffic bursts. We conduct simulation based on both Facebook’s real DCN traces and our synthesized highly bursty DCN traces. TROD reduces flow completion time (FCT) by at least 2× compared with the existing optical DCN designs, and by approximately 2.4-3.2× compared with expander graph DCN. Compared with the non-blocking Clos, TROD reduces the hop count of the majority packets by one, and could even outperform the non-blocking Clos with proper bandwidth over-provision at the optical layer. Note that TROD can be built with commercially available hardware and does not require host modifications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":343813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE 29th International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE 29th International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNP52444.2021.9651977\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE 29th International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNP52444.2021.9651977","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

尽管存在电交换的带宽扩展限制和建设Clos数据中心网络(DCNs)的高成本,但光DCNs的采用仍然受到限制。有两个原因。首先,现有的光DCN设计通常面临巨大的部署复杂性。其次,这些设计不是全光学的,相对于非阻塞Clos DCN的性能优势尚不清楚。在研究了现有光DCN设计的设计权衡之后,我们提出了基于阈值路由的光数据中心(TROD),这是一种低复杂度的光DCN,具有优于其他光DCN的性能。在TROD中有两个新颖的设计促成了它的成功。首先,TROD基于重复出现的流量模式执行健壮的拓扑优化,因此不需要对每个流量变化做出反应,从而降低了部署和管理的复杂性。其次,TROD引入了tVLB(基于阈值的负载均衡),即使在意外的流量突发情况下,也可以尽可能地避免网络拥塞。我们基于Facebook的真实DCN轨迹和我们合成的高度突发DCN轨迹进行了模拟。与现有的光学DCN设计相比,TROD将流动完井时间(FCT)减少了至少2倍,与扩展图DCN设计相比减少了大约2.4-3.2倍。与非阻塞Clos相比,TROD将大多数数据包的跳数减少了1,并且在光层适当的带宽过剩下甚至可以优于非阻塞Clos。注意,TROD可以用商用硬件构建,不需要修改主机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TROD: Evolving From Electrical Data Center to Optical Data Center
Despite the bandwidth scaling limit of electrical switching and the high cost of building Clos data center networks (DCNs), the adoption of optical DCNs is still limited. There are two reasons. First, existing optical DCN designs usually face tremendous deployment complexity. Second, these designs are not full-optical and the performance benefit against the non-blocking Clos DCN is not clear.After exploring the design tradeoffs of the existing optical DCN designs, we propose TROD (Threshold Routing based Optical Datacenter), a low-complexity optical DCN with superior performance than other optical DCNs. There are two novel designs in TROD that contribute to its success. First, TROD performs robust topology optimization based on the recurring traffic patterns and thus does not need to react to every traffic change, which lowers deployment and management complexity. Second, TROD introduces tVLB (threshold-based VLB), which can avoid network congestion as much as possible even under unexpected traffic bursts. We conduct simulation based on both Facebook’s real DCN traces and our synthesized highly bursty DCN traces. TROD reduces flow completion time (FCT) by at least 2× compared with the existing optical DCN designs, and by approximately 2.4-3.2× compared with expander graph DCN. Compared with the non-blocking Clos, TROD reduces the hop count of the majority packets by one, and could even outperform the non-blocking Clos with proper bandwidth over-provision at the optical layer. Note that TROD can be built with commercially available hardware and does not require host modifications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploiting WiFi AP for Simultaneous Data Dissemination among WiFi and ZigBee Devices Highway On-Ramp Merging for Mixed Traffic: Recent Advances and Future Trends Generalizable and Interpretable Deep Learning for Network Congestion Prediction DNSonChain: Delegating Privacy-Preserved DNS Resolution to Blockchain ISP Self-Operated BGP Anomaly Detection Based on Weakly Supervised Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1