金融集团折扣:来自股票收益偏态的洞察

S. Bressan, Alex Weissensteiner
{"title":"金融集团折扣:来自股票收益偏态的洞察","authors":"S. Bressan, Alex Weissensteiner","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3339579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Empirical evidence shows that diversified banks (i.e. financial conglomerates) trade at a discount compared to a matched portfolio of specialized stand-alone banks. While one strand of research explains this puzzle primarily with inefficiencies in the cash flow management, we analyze whether this evidence is due to expected returns which compensate investors for skewness exposure. Our empirical findings support this hypothesis. We implement different (co-)skewness measures proposed by the previous literature. We illustrate that diversified banks have asset returns with lower skewness, and, as a consequence of lower upside potential, investors demand for these stocks a higher discount or, vice versa, higher expected returns. Different robustness checks corroborate our main result.","PeriodicalId":375725,"journal":{"name":"SPGMI: Capital IQ Data (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Financial Conglomerate Discount: Insights from Stock Return Skewness\",\"authors\":\"S. Bressan, Alex Weissensteiner\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3339579\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Empirical evidence shows that diversified banks (i.e. financial conglomerates) trade at a discount compared to a matched portfolio of specialized stand-alone banks. While one strand of research explains this puzzle primarily with inefficiencies in the cash flow management, we analyze whether this evidence is due to expected returns which compensate investors for skewness exposure. Our empirical findings support this hypothesis. We implement different (co-)skewness measures proposed by the previous literature. We illustrate that diversified banks have asset returns with lower skewness, and, as a consequence of lower upside potential, investors demand for these stocks a higher discount or, vice versa, higher expected returns. Different robustness checks corroborate our main result.\",\"PeriodicalId\":375725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SPGMI: Capital IQ Data (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SPGMI: Capital IQ Data (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3339579\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPGMI: Capital IQ Data (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3339579","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

经验证据表明,与专业独立银行的匹配投资组合相比,多元化银行(即金融集团)的交易价格较低。虽然一项研究主要用现金流管理效率低下来解释这一难题,但我们分析了这一证据是否归因于补偿投资者偏倚风险的预期回报。我们的实证研究结果支持这一假设。我们采用了以前文献中提出的不同(共)偏度度量。我们说明,多元化银行的资产回报具有较低的偏度,并且,由于较低的上涨潜力,投资者对这些股票的需求更高的折扣,反之亦然,更高的预期回报。不同的稳健性检验证实了我们的主要结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Financial Conglomerate Discount: Insights from Stock Return Skewness
Empirical evidence shows that diversified banks (i.e. financial conglomerates) trade at a discount compared to a matched portfolio of specialized stand-alone banks. While one strand of research explains this puzzle primarily with inefficiencies in the cash flow management, we analyze whether this evidence is due to expected returns which compensate investors for skewness exposure. Our empirical findings support this hypothesis. We implement different (co-)skewness measures proposed by the previous literature. We illustrate that diversified banks have asset returns with lower skewness, and, as a consequence of lower upside potential, investors demand for these stocks a higher discount or, vice versa, higher expected returns. Different robustness checks corroborate our main result.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Why Is a CCP Failure Very Unlikely? Does Shareholder Litigation Risk Cause Public Firms to Delist? Evidence From Securities Class Action Lawsuits How Do Institutional Investors React to Geographically Dispersed Information Shocks? A Test Using the COVID-19 Pandemic Disequilibrium Propagation of Quantity Constraints: Application to the COVID Lockdowns A Green Wave in Media, a Change of Tack in Stock Markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1