安全关键软件开发的行为方面

Per Lenberg, R. Feldt, Lars Göran Wallgren Tengberg, Lucas Gren
{"title":"安全关键软件开发的行为方面","authors":"Per Lenberg, R. Feldt, Lars Göran Wallgren Tengberg, Lucas Gren","doi":"10.1145/3387940.3392227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We are becoming increasingly dependent on software systems also for highly critical tasks in society. To minimize the risk of failures, regulatory institutions define standards that software organizations must meet. However, the quality of the safety-critical software is, ultimately, determined by the software engineers' behavior. Even though previous studies have recognized the significance of such behavioral aspects, research that studies them is limited. The aim of this initial study was, therefore, to identify how and in what way, behavioral aspects affect the quality of safety-critical software. Thematic analysis of interviews with six software engineers identified four themes linking developer behavior to safety. Our analysis suggests that developing safety-critical systems imposes stress on software engineers and that to reduce such pressure it is critical to enhance organizational trust. It also indicates that the agile way-of-working has the potential to improve safety by facilitating the sharing of domain knowledge. Our findings provide directions for future studies into these important aspects and can be of wider relevance, in particular for the development of secure software, but potentially also for general software engineering.","PeriodicalId":309659,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering Workshops","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Behavioral Aspects of Safety-Critical Software Development\",\"authors\":\"Per Lenberg, R. Feldt, Lars Göran Wallgren Tengberg, Lucas Gren\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3387940.3392227\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We are becoming increasingly dependent on software systems also for highly critical tasks in society. To minimize the risk of failures, regulatory institutions define standards that software organizations must meet. However, the quality of the safety-critical software is, ultimately, determined by the software engineers' behavior. Even though previous studies have recognized the significance of such behavioral aspects, research that studies them is limited. The aim of this initial study was, therefore, to identify how and in what way, behavioral aspects affect the quality of safety-critical software. Thematic analysis of interviews with six software engineers identified four themes linking developer behavior to safety. Our analysis suggests that developing safety-critical systems imposes stress on software engineers and that to reduce such pressure it is critical to enhance organizational trust. It also indicates that the agile way-of-working has the potential to improve safety by facilitating the sharing of domain knowledge. Our findings provide directions for future studies into these important aspects and can be of wider relevance, in particular for the development of secure software, but potentially also for general software engineering.\",\"PeriodicalId\":309659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering Workshops\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering Workshops\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3387940.3392227\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering Workshops","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3387940.3392227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们越来越依赖软件系统来完成社会中非常关键的任务。为了最小化失败的风险,监管机构定义了软件组织必须满足的标准。然而,安全关键软件的质量最终是由软件工程师的行为决定的。尽管以前的研究已经认识到这些行为方面的重要性,但研究它们的研究是有限的。因此,这个初步研究的目的是确定行为方面如何以及以何种方式影响安全关键软件的质量。对六位软件工程师的访谈进行主题分析,确定了将开发人员行为与安全联系起来的四个主题。我们的分析表明,开发安全关键系统给软件工程师带来了压力,为了减轻这种压力,增强组织信任至关重要。它还表明,敏捷工作方式有潜力通过促进领域知识的共享来提高安全性。我们的发现为这些重要方面的未来研究提供了方向,并且可以具有更广泛的相关性,特别是对于安全软件的开发,但也可能用于通用软件工程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Behavioral Aspects of Safety-Critical Software Development
We are becoming increasingly dependent on software systems also for highly critical tasks in society. To minimize the risk of failures, regulatory institutions define standards that software organizations must meet. However, the quality of the safety-critical software is, ultimately, determined by the software engineers' behavior. Even though previous studies have recognized the significance of such behavioral aspects, research that studies them is limited. The aim of this initial study was, therefore, to identify how and in what way, behavioral aspects affect the quality of safety-critical software. Thematic analysis of interviews with six software engineers identified four themes linking developer behavior to safety. Our analysis suggests that developing safety-critical systems imposes stress on software engineers and that to reduce such pressure it is critical to enhance organizational trust. It also indicates that the agile way-of-working has the potential to improve safety by facilitating the sharing of domain knowledge. Our findings provide directions for future studies into these important aspects and can be of wider relevance, in particular for the development of secure software, but potentially also for general software engineering.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Preliminary Systematic Mapping on Software Engineering for Robotic Systems: A Software Quality Perspective Generating API Test Data Using Deep Reinforcement Learning Human Factors in the Study of Automatic Software Repair: Future Directions for Research with Industry Strategies for Crowdworkers to Overcome Barriers in Competition-based Software Crowdsourcing Development Centralized Generic Interfaces in Hardware/Software Co-design for AI Accelerators
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1