Xia Wu, Yulong Qi, Fei Feng, Guanxun Cheng, N. Zhang
{"title":"DCE-MRI药代动力学分析与乳腺图像报告和数据系统(BIRADS)分类的相关性","authors":"Xia Wu, Yulong Qi, Fei Feng, Guanxun Cheng, N. Zhang","doi":"10.1145/3418094.3418106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To determine if pharmacokinetic information derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) could improve the diagnostic value of breast disease. A total of thirty-six female patients (range, 30-70 years, mean 48.1±12.6 years) confirmed BIRADS 3~6 underwent DCE-MRI were retrospectively recruited to this study. Modified two-compartment Tofts model and Brix mode were used to obtain relevant tracer kinetic parameters. Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare the parameters between the BIRADS 3 and 4, BIRADS 4 and 5, BIRADS 5 and 6, respectively. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate a significant difference. In evaluating significance between BIRADS 3 and BIRADS 4, the statistical analysis showed that Brix-kep (P=0.014), ABrix (P<0.001), TTP (P=0.022) were independent factors associated with the discrepancy. All kinetic parameters we calculated were independent factors associated with the discrepancy between BIRADS 4 and BIRADS 5. ABrix (AUC=0.915) do have a good discriminative power between BIRADS 3 and 4. Tofts-kep (AUC= 0.952), ABrix (AUC= 0.990) do have a good discriminative power between BIRADS 4 and 5.The numeric values of Brix-kep, Brix-kel, ABrix, Tofts-ktrans, Tofts-kep and Slope were higher in high grades (BIRADS 5 and BIRADS 6) than in low grades (BIRADS 3 and BIRADS 4) tumors. ABrix have a good discriminative power between BIRADS 3 and 4. Tofts-kep, ABrix do have a good discriminative power between BIRADS 4 and 5. No significant difference between BIRADS 5 and 6.","PeriodicalId":192804,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Medical and Health Informatics","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation Between Pharmacokinetic Analysis of DCE-MRI and Breast Image Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) Classification\",\"authors\":\"Xia Wu, Yulong Qi, Fei Feng, Guanxun Cheng, N. Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3418094.3418106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To determine if pharmacokinetic information derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) could improve the diagnostic value of breast disease. A total of thirty-six female patients (range, 30-70 years, mean 48.1±12.6 years) confirmed BIRADS 3~6 underwent DCE-MRI were retrospectively recruited to this study. Modified two-compartment Tofts model and Brix mode were used to obtain relevant tracer kinetic parameters. Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare the parameters between the BIRADS 3 and 4, BIRADS 4 and 5, BIRADS 5 and 6, respectively. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate a significant difference. In evaluating significance between BIRADS 3 and BIRADS 4, the statistical analysis showed that Brix-kep (P=0.014), ABrix (P<0.001), TTP (P=0.022) were independent factors associated with the discrepancy. All kinetic parameters we calculated were independent factors associated with the discrepancy between BIRADS 4 and BIRADS 5. ABrix (AUC=0.915) do have a good discriminative power between BIRADS 3 and 4. Tofts-kep (AUC= 0.952), ABrix (AUC= 0.990) do have a good discriminative power between BIRADS 4 and 5.The numeric values of Brix-kep, Brix-kel, ABrix, Tofts-ktrans, Tofts-kep and Slope were higher in high grades (BIRADS 5 and BIRADS 6) than in low grades (BIRADS 3 and BIRADS 4) tumors. ABrix have a good discriminative power between BIRADS 3 and 4. Tofts-kep, ABrix do have a good discriminative power between BIRADS 4 and 5. No significant difference between BIRADS 5 and 6.\",\"PeriodicalId\":192804,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Medical and Health Informatics\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Medical and Health Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3418094.3418106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Medical and Health Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3418094.3418106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Correlation Between Pharmacokinetic Analysis of DCE-MRI and Breast Image Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) Classification
To determine if pharmacokinetic information derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) could improve the diagnostic value of breast disease. A total of thirty-six female patients (range, 30-70 years, mean 48.1±12.6 years) confirmed BIRADS 3~6 underwent DCE-MRI were retrospectively recruited to this study. Modified two-compartment Tofts model and Brix mode were used to obtain relevant tracer kinetic parameters. Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare the parameters between the BIRADS 3 and 4, BIRADS 4 and 5, BIRADS 5 and 6, respectively. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate a significant difference. In evaluating significance between BIRADS 3 and BIRADS 4, the statistical analysis showed that Brix-kep (P=0.014), ABrix (P<0.001), TTP (P=0.022) were independent factors associated with the discrepancy. All kinetic parameters we calculated were independent factors associated with the discrepancy between BIRADS 4 and BIRADS 5. ABrix (AUC=0.915) do have a good discriminative power between BIRADS 3 and 4. Tofts-kep (AUC= 0.952), ABrix (AUC= 0.990) do have a good discriminative power between BIRADS 4 and 5.The numeric values of Brix-kep, Brix-kel, ABrix, Tofts-ktrans, Tofts-kep and Slope were higher in high grades (BIRADS 5 and BIRADS 6) than in low grades (BIRADS 3 and BIRADS 4) tumors. ABrix have a good discriminative power between BIRADS 3 and 4. Tofts-kep, ABrix do have a good discriminative power between BIRADS 4 and 5. No significant difference between BIRADS 5 and 6.