DCE-MRI药代动力学分析与乳腺图像报告和数据系统(BIRADS)分类的相关性

Xia Wu, Yulong Qi, Fei Feng, Guanxun Cheng, N. Zhang
{"title":"DCE-MRI药代动力学分析与乳腺图像报告和数据系统(BIRADS)分类的相关性","authors":"Xia Wu, Yulong Qi, Fei Feng, Guanxun Cheng, N. Zhang","doi":"10.1145/3418094.3418106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To determine if pharmacokinetic information derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) could improve the diagnostic value of breast disease. A total of thirty-six female patients (range, 30-70 years, mean 48.1±12.6 years) confirmed BIRADS 3~6 underwent DCE-MRI were retrospectively recruited to this study. Modified two-compartment Tofts model and Brix mode were used to obtain relevant tracer kinetic parameters. Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare the parameters between the BIRADS 3 and 4, BIRADS 4 and 5, BIRADS 5 and 6, respectively. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate a significant difference. In evaluating significance between BIRADS 3 and BIRADS 4, the statistical analysis showed that Brix-kep (P=0.014), ABrix (P<0.001), TTP (P=0.022) were independent factors associated with the discrepancy. All kinetic parameters we calculated were independent factors associated with the discrepancy between BIRADS 4 and BIRADS 5. ABrix (AUC=0.915) do have a good discriminative power between BIRADS 3 and 4. Tofts-kep (AUC= 0.952), ABrix (AUC= 0.990) do have a good discriminative power between BIRADS 4 and 5.The numeric values of Brix-kep, Brix-kel, ABrix, Tofts-ktrans, Tofts-kep and Slope were higher in high grades (BIRADS 5 and BIRADS 6) than in low grades (BIRADS 3 and BIRADS 4) tumors. ABrix have a good discriminative power between BIRADS 3 and 4. Tofts-kep, ABrix do have a good discriminative power between BIRADS 4 and 5. No significant difference between BIRADS 5 and 6.","PeriodicalId":192804,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Medical and Health Informatics","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation Between Pharmacokinetic Analysis of DCE-MRI and Breast Image Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) Classification\",\"authors\":\"Xia Wu, Yulong Qi, Fei Feng, Guanxun Cheng, N. Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3418094.3418106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To determine if pharmacokinetic information derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) could improve the diagnostic value of breast disease. A total of thirty-six female patients (range, 30-70 years, mean 48.1±12.6 years) confirmed BIRADS 3~6 underwent DCE-MRI were retrospectively recruited to this study. Modified two-compartment Tofts model and Brix mode were used to obtain relevant tracer kinetic parameters. Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare the parameters between the BIRADS 3 and 4, BIRADS 4 and 5, BIRADS 5 and 6, respectively. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate a significant difference. In evaluating significance between BIRADS 3 and BIRADS 4, the statistical analysis showed that Brix-kep (P=0.014), ABrix (P<0.001), TTP (P=0.022) were independent factors associated with the discrepancy. All kinetic parameters we calculated were independent factors associated with the discrepancy between BIRADS 4 and BIRADS 5. ABrix (AUC=0.915) do have a good discriminative power between BIRADS 3 and 4. Tofts-kep (AUC= 0.952), ABrix (AUC= 0.990) do have a good discriminative power between BIRADS 4 and 5.The numeric values of Brix-kep, Brix-kel, ABrix, Tofts-ktrans, Tofts-kep and Slope were higher in high grades (BIRADS 5 and BIRADS 6) than in low grades (BIRADS 3 and BIRADS 4) tumors. ABrix have a good discriminative power between BIRADS 3 and 4. Tofts-kep, ABrix do have a good discriminative power between BIRADS 4 and 5. No significant difference between BIRADS 5 and 6.\",\"PeriodicalId\":192804,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Medical and Health Informatics\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Medical and Health Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3418094.3418106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Medical and Health Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3418094.3418106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨动态增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)的药代动力学信息是否能提高乳腺疾病的诊断价值。回顾性招募36例经DCE-MRI证实BIRADS 3~6的女性患者(年龄30 ~ 70岁,平均48.1±12.6岁)。采用改进的双室Tofts模型和Brix模型获得了相关的示踪剂动力学参数。采用Mann-Whitney u检验分别比较BIRADS 3与4、BIRADS 4与5、BIRADS 5与6的参数。P值小于0.05为差异有统计学意义。在评价BIRADS 3与BIRADS 4之间的显著性时,统计学分析显示Brix-kep (P=0.014)、ABrix (P<0.001)、TTP (P=0.022)是导致差异的独立因素。我们计算的所有动力学参数都是与BIRADS 4和BIRADS 5差异相关的独立因素。ABrix (AUC=0.915)在BIRADS 3和BIRADS 4之间有很好的判别能力。tofts - keep (AUC= 0.952)和ABrix (AUC= 0.990)在BIRADS 4和BIRADS 5之间具有较好的判别能力。brix - keep、Brix-kel、ABrix、Tofts-ktrans、tofts - keep和Slope的数值在高分级(BIRADS 5和BIRADS 6)肿瘤中高于低分级(BIRADS 3和BIRADS 4)肿瘤。ABrix对BIRADS 3和BIRADS 4具有较好的判别能力。尽管如此,ABrix在BIRADS 4和BIRADS 5之间确实有很好的区分能力。BIRADS 5和6之间无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Correlation Between Pharmacokinetic Analysis of DCE-MRI and Breast Image Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) Classification
To determine if pharmacokinetic information derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) could improve the diagnostic value of breast disease. A total of thirty-six female patients (range, 30-70 years, mean 48.1±12.6 years) confirmed BIRADS 3~6 underwent DCE-MRI were retrospectively recruited to this study. Modified two-compartment Tofts model and Brix mode were used to obtain relevant tracer kinetic parameters. Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare the parameters between the BIRADS 3 and 4, BIRADS 4 and 5, BIRADS 5 and 6, respectively. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate a significant difference. In evaluating significance between BIRADS 3 and BIRADS 4, the statistical analysis showed that Brix-kep (P=0.014), ABrix (P<0.001), TTP (P=0.022) were independent factors associated with the discrepancy. All kinetic parameters we calculated were independent factors associated with the discrepancy between BIRADS 4 and BIRADS 5. ABrix (AUC=0.915) do have a good discriminative power between BIRADS 3 and 4. Tofts-kep (AUC= 0.952), ABrix (AUC= 0.990) do have a good discriminative power between BIRADS 4 and 5.The numeric values of Brix-kep, Brix-kel, ABrix, Tofts-ktrans, Tofts-kep and Slope were higher in high grades (BIRADS 5 and BIRADS 6) than in low grades (BIRADS 3 and BIRADS 4) tumors. ABrix have a good discriminative power between BIRADS 3 and 4. Tofts-kep, ABrix do have a good discriminative power between BIRADS 4 and 5. No significant difference between BIRADS 5 and 6.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efficient Signature Scheme Using Extended Chaotic Maps for Medical Imaging Records A Cloud Based Big Data Health-Analytics-as-a-Service Framework to Support Low Resource Setting Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Psychological Effect of the COVID 19 Pandemic on Hospital Health Personnel based on Impact Scales Integrated Rescue System and the Use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle not only for the Population Protection Coronary Artery Disease Classification from Photoplethysmographic Signals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1