伯杰,不情愿的异教徒

Vincenzo Pace
{"title":"伯杰,不情愿的异教徒","authors":"Vincenzo Pace","doi":"10.18224/cam.v20i1.12226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Peter Berger was one of the most authoritative theorists of the secularization’s paradigm. In 1999 he himself announced that this assumption was wrong. Outside of Europe and, partially, of North America, in the rest of the world religions ap-peared to him, in fact, furiously vital, amidst spiritual awakenings, revolutionary mobilizations and conquests of political power. The author wonders if it was a true epistemological turning point that Berger experienced and recounted in his resear-ches before and after 1999. The hypothesis put forward is that, on closer inspection, Berger, while changing the point of view in the analysis of the religious phenomenon, he has always remained a reluctant heretic. That he was first convinced of the decline of religion in the modern world and, subsequently, forced to make self-cri-ticism does not mean that Berger was not completely a sociologist faithful to the methodological rule of studying the religious phenomenon etsi Deus non daretur. The fact that he was a believer did not prevent him in any case from a heretical at-titude with respect to his personal faith. A heretic who has never succumbed to the temptation to apologize for his faith.","PeriodicalId":282717,"journal":{"name":"Revista Caminhos - Revista de Ciências da Religião","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BERGER, L’ERETICO RILUTTANTE\",\"authors\":\"Vincenzo Pace\",\"doi\":\"10.18224/cam.v20i1.12226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Peter Berger was one of the most authoritative theorists of the secularization’s paradigm. In 1999 he himself announced that this assumption was wrong. Outside of Europe and, partially, of North America, in the rest of the world religions ap-peared to him, in fact, furiously vital, amidst spiritual awakenings, revolutionary mobilizations and conquests of political power. The author wonders if it was a true epistemological turning point that Berger experienced and recounted in his resear-ches before and after 1999. The hypothesis put forward is that, on closer inspection, Berger, while changing the point of view in the analysis of the religious phenomenon, he has always remained a reluctant heretic. That he was first convinced of the decline of religion in the modern world and, subsequently, forced to make self-cri-ticism does not mean that Berger was not completely a sociologist faithful to the methodological rule of studying the religious phenomenon etsi Deus non daretur. The fact that he was a believer did not prevent him in any case from a heretical at-titude with respect to his personal faith. A heretic who has never succumbed to the temptation to apologize for his faith.\",\"PeriodicalId\":282717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Caminhos - Revista de Ciências da Religião\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Caminhos - Revista de Ciências da Religião\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18224/cam.v20i1.12226\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Caminhos - Revista de Ciências da Religião","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18224/cam.v20i1.12226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

彼得·伯杰是世俗化范式最权威的理论家之一。1999年,他自己宣布这种假设是错误的。在欧洲以外,部分在北美,在世界其他地方,宗教在他看来,实际上,在精神觉醒、革命动员和政治权力的征服中,都是极其重要的。作者想知道伯杰在1999年前后的研究中所经历和叙述的这是否是一个真正的认识论转折点。提出的假设是,仔细观察,伯杰虽然在分析宗教现象时改变了观点,但他始终是一个不情愿的异教徒。他首先确信宗教在现代世界的衰落,随后被迫进行自我批评,但这并不意味着伯杰不是一个完全忠实于研究宗教现象的方法论规则的社会学家。虽然他是一个信徒,但这并不妨碍他在个人信仰方面采取异端的态度。一个从不屈服于为他的信仰道歉的诱惑的异教徒。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
BERGER, L’ERETICO RILUTTANTE
: Peter Berger was one of the most authoritative theorists of the secularization’s paradigm. In 1999 he himself announced that this assumption was wrong. Outside of Europe and, partially, of North America, in the rest of the world religions ap-peared to him, in fact, furiously vital, amidst spiritual awakenings, revolutionary mobilizations and conquests of political power. The author wonders if it was a true epistemological turning point that Berger experienced and recounted in his resear-ches before and after 1999. The hypothesis put forward is that, on closer inspection, Berger, while changing the point of view in the analysis of the religious phenomenon, he has always remained a reluctant heretic. That he was first convinced of the decline of religion in the modern world and, subsequently, forced to make self-cri-ticism does not mean that Berger was not completely a sociologist faithful to the methodological rule of studying the religious phenomenon etsi Deus non daretur. The fact that he was a believer did not prevent him in any case from a heretical at-titude with respect to his personal faith. A heretic who has never succumbed to the temptation to apologize for his faith.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
BOLSONARISMO E EVANGELHO DA PAZ COMO SISTEMAS ANTAGÔNICOS MULHERES QUE CONQUISTARAM ESPAÇO E VOZ NA BÍBLIA: RESISTÊNCIAS AO PATRIARCALISMO SEXUALIDADE, CAMINHOS HUMANOS E DIVERSIDADE GRUPOS JUDAICOS LGBTQIA+: EMERGÊNCIA, OBJETIVOS E PERSPECTIVAS ENSINO RELIGIOSO NO ENSINO MÉDIO: UMA PROPOSTA DE REFLEXÃO SOBRE O SENTIDO DE VIDA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1