与欧洲人权法院对话的边界

L. Glas
{"title":"与欧洲人权法院对话的边界","authors":"L. Glas","doi":"10.1017/9781780688008.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This contribution aims to answer the question which legal boundaries are applicable when domestic courts engage in a dialogue with the ECtHR about a Strasbourg judgment. This question is answered from an international legal perspective, i.e. the perspective of the ECtHR, and the perspective of eleven domestic legal orders. Where possible, this contribution will comment on the practical significance of the legal boundaries found, so as to put their significance into perspective.","PeriodicalId":373856,"journal":{"name":"European Yearbook on Human Rights 2018","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Boundaries to Dialogue with the European Court of Human Rights\",\"authors\":\"L. Glas\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/9781780688008.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This contribution aims to answer the question which legal boundaries are applicable when domestic courts engage in a dialogue with the ECtHR about a Strasbourg judgment. This question is answered from an international legal perspective, i.e. the perspective of the ECtHR, and the perspective of eleven domestic legal orders. Where possible, this contribution will comment on the practical significance of the legal boundaries found, so as to put their significance into perspective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":373856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Yearbook on Human Rights 2018\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Yearbook on Human Rights 2018\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780688008.013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Yearbook on Human Rights 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780688008.013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这篇文章的目的是回答国内法院与欧洲人权法院就斯特拉斯堡判决进行对话时适用哪些法律界限的问题。这个问题可以从国际法的角度,即欧洲人权法院的角度,以及11个国内法律秩序的角度来回答。在可能的情况下,这篇文章将评论所发现的法律界限的实际意义,以便正确地看待它们的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Boundaries to Dialogue with the European Court of Human Rights
This contribution aims to answer the question which legal boundaries are applicable when domestic courts engage in a dialogue with the ECtHR about a Strasbourg judgment. This question is answered from an international legal perspective, i.e. the perspective of the ECtHR, and the perspective of eleven domestic legal orders. Where possible, this contribution will comment on the practical significance of the legal boundaries found, so as to put their significance into perspective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The EU Guidelines on Freedom of Religion or Belief at Their Fifth Anniversary: Implementation Lagging Behind? Human Rights Council in Troubled Waters: The EU as a Stabilising Factor Sionaidh Douglas-Scott and Nicholas Hatzis (eds.): Research Handbook on EU Law and Human Rights Rising Populism and its Impact on Women's Rights: Selected Cases from the OSCE Region A Decade of Violations of the European Convention on Human Rights: Exploring Patterns of Repetitive Violations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1