立法责任的结构与特殊性探析

Junseong Mo
{"title":"立法责任的结构与特殊性探析","authors":"Junseong Mo","doi":"10.58555/li.2022.1.65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is an exploratory discussion for practically realizing the legislative responsibility that legislators have to bear according to the Constitution, and aims to explore the structure and the particularities of legislative responsibility. Legislative responsibility can be defined as a comprehensive responsibility based on the obligations imposed on legislators by the Constitution. In order to explore the particularities of legislative responsibility, the basic structure and essence of legislative responsibility and the particularities of constitutional responsibility are examined preconditionally. \nSince there are legislative obligations that the Constitution imposes on the legislator, it can be said that legislative responsibility also exists. However, the particularities of the constitutional responsibility due to the constitutional characteristics and the particularities of the legislative responsibility due to the legislative characteristics act as a difficulty in realizing the legislative responsibility. In particular, the legislative responsibility is also limited because of the inability to impose unsatisfiable obligations on individual legislators who are fully exposed to the complexity of the external environment, and the normatively and factually impossibility of determining violations of legislative obligations. \nFor this reason, in order to practically realize the legislative responsibility, it is necessary to preemptively reduce the risk of violation of the legislative obligations as much as possible. In other words, rather than ex post determining whether a specific legislative procedure or legislative output violates the legislative obligations, a preemptive mechanism should be prepared to minimize the risk of violating the legislative obligation in the course of the legislative process. This avoids leaving the legislative responsibility as a nominal responsibility or realizing it solely as a political responsibility by the people. A way to reduce the risk of violation of legislative obligations is, for example, to document and disclose all information and reasons on which individual legislators base their judgments when making legislative choices. This not only improves the political responsibility by the people, but can also function as a means for individual legislators to be exempted from the responsibility for violations of legislative obligations.","PeriodicalId":115318,"journal":{"name":"Center for Legislative Studies, Gyeongin National University of Education","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Exploratory Study on the Structure and the Particularities of Legislative Responsibility\",\"authors\":\"Junseong Mo\",\"doi\":\"10.58555/li.2022.1.65\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article is an exploratory discussion for practically realizing the legislative responsibility that legislators have to bear according to the Constitution, and aims to explore the structure and the particularities of legislative responsibility. Legislative responsibility can be defined as a comprehensive responsibility based on the obligations imposed on legislators by the Constitution. In order to explore the particularities of legislative responsibility, the basic structure and essence of legislative responsibility and the particularities of constitutional responsibility are examined preconditionally. \\nSince there are legislative obligations that the Constitution imposes on the legislator, it can be said that legislative responsibility also exists. However, the particularities of the constitutional responsibility due to the constitutional characteristics and the particularities of the legislative responsibility due to the legislative characteristics act as a difficulty in realizing the legislative responsibility. In particular, the legislative responsibility is also limited because of the inability to impose unsatisfiable obligations on individual legislators who are fully exposed to the complexity of the external environment, and the normatively and factually impossibility of determining violations of legislative obligations. \\nFor this reason, in order to practically realize the legislative responsibility, it is necessary to preemptively reduce the risk of violation of the legislative obligations as much as possible. In other words, rather than ex post determining whether a specific legislative procedure or legislative output violates the legislative obligations, a preemptive mechanism should be prepared to minimize the risk of violating the legislative obligation in the course of the legislative process. This avoids leaving the legislative responsibility as a nominal responsibility or realizing it solely as a political responsibility by the people. A way to reduce the risk of violation of legislative obligations is, for example, to document and disclose all information and reasons on which individual legislators base their judgments when making legislative choices. This not only improves the political responsibility by the people, but can also function as a means for individual legislators to be exempted from the responsibility for violations of legislative obligations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":115318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Center for Legislative Studies, Gyeongin National University of Education\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Center for Legislative Studies, Gyeongin National University of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58555/li.2022.1.65\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Center for Legislative Studies, Gyeongin National University of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58555/li.2022.1.65","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在探讨立法责任的结构及其特殊性,为立法者切实实现宪法规定的立法责任进行探索性探讨。立法责任可以定义为基于宪法赋予立法者的义务的一种综合责任。为了探究立法责任的特殊性,首先考察了立法责任的基本结构和本质以及宪法责任的特殊性。既然宪法规定了立法者的立法义务,那么可以说立法责任也是存在的。然而,由于宪法性质而产生的宪法责任的特殊性和由于立法性质而产生的立法责任的特殊性构成了立法责任实现的难点。特别是,立法责任也是有限的,因为无法将无法履行的义务强加给充分暴露于外部环境复杂性的立法者个人,以及在规范和事实上无法确定违反立法义务的行为。为此,为了切实实现立法责任,有必要尽可能先发制人地降低违反立法义务的风险。换句话说,不应事后确定某一特定立法程序或立法产出是否违反立法义务,而应准备一种先发制人的机制,以尽量减少立法过程中违反立法义务的风险。这就避免了把立法责任作为一种名义上的责任,或者仅仅作为人民的政治责任来实现立法责任。例如,减少违反立法义务风险的一种方法是记录和披露立法者个人在作出立法选择时所依据的所有信息和理由。这不仅提高了人民的政治责任,而且可以作为立法者个人违反立法义务免除责任的手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Exploratory Study on the Structure and the Particularities of Legislative Responsibility
This article is an exploratory discussion for practically realizing the legislative responsibility that legislators have to bear according to the Constitution, and aims to explore the structure and the particularities of legislative responsibility. Legislative responsibility can be defined as a comprehensive responsibility based on the obligations imposed on legislators by the Constitution. In order to explore the particularities of legislative responsibility, the basic structure and essence of legislative responsibility and the particularities of constitutional responsibility are examined preconditionally. Since there are legislative obligations that the Constitution imposes on the legislator, it can be said that legislative responsibility also exists. However, the particularities of the constitutional responsibility due to the constitutional characteristics and the particularities of the legislative responsibility due to the legislative characteristics act as a difficulty in realizing the legislative responsibility. In particular, the legislative responsibility is also limited because of the inability to impose unsatisfiable obligations on individual legislators who are fully exposed to the complexity of the external environment, and the normatively and factually impossibility of determining violations of legislative obligations. For this reason, in order to practically realize the legislative responsibility, it is necessary to preemptively reduce the risk of violation of the legislative obligations as much as possible. In other words, rather than ex post determining whether a specific legislative procedure or legislative output violates the legislative obligations, a preemptive mechanism should be prepared to minimize the risk of violating the legislative obligation in the course of the legislative process. This avoids leaving the legislative responsibility as a nominal responsibility or realizing it solely as a political responsibility by the people. A way to reduce the risk of violation of legislative obligations is, for example, to document and disclose all information and reasons on which individual legislators base their judgments when making legislative choices. This not only improves the political responsibility by the people, but can also function as a means for individual legislators to be exempted from the responsibility for violations of legislative obligations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
입법영향분석 어떻게 할 것인가? Principles and Limitations of Using Personal Location Data for Public Interest: Implications for Legislative Technology of Personal Data Protection Act A study on the revision of the “Security Guard Act” and the establishment of 'Congestion Guard' in Japan The Normative Power of the Inter-Korean Agreement The Gap in the Legal Texts and the Supplementation by Interpretation - Focusing on the provisions and interpretations of property rights under Article 23 of the Constitution -
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1