高等教育中的千禧一代:他们的学习方式真的不同吗

Dr Preeti Goyal, Poornima Gupta
{"title":"高等教育中的千禧一代:他们的学习方式真的不同吗","authors":"Dr Preeti Goyal, Poornima Gupta","doi":"10.15415/iie.2022.101001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Effective skill development remains an important vehicle for national prosperity. Aswhat appeared to work with their predecessor generation (Gen X) does not have the same results with Millennials many educators today are experimenting with pedagogies to effectively train Millennials. Globally, it is becoming evident that the Millennials in higher education learn very differently than their predecessors.\nPurpose: Our study provides comparisons on three learning parameters of learning affectivity, goal orientation and competition between Gen X & Millennials..\n Methods: To study whether the learning attributes are similar or they differ across the two generations we compared the means of the three attributes under consideration. Results: We find Millennials to be different from Gen X across the three studied parameters suggesting that teaching pedagogies require a rethink for Millennials.\nConclusions: These results could be useful in designing appropriate teaching pedagogies that are likely to improve Millennials’ learning.","PeriodicalId":368856,"journal":{"name":"Issues and Ideas in Education","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Millennials in Higher Education: Do They Really Learn Differently\",\"authors\":\"Dr Preeti Goyal, Poornima Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.15415/iie.2022.101001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Effective skill development remains an important vehicle for national prosperity. Aswhat appeared to work with their predecessor generation (Gen X) does not have the same results with Millennials many educators today are experimenting with pedagogies to effectively train Millennials. Globally, it is becoming evident that the Millennials in higher education learn very differently than their predecessors.\\nPurpose: Our study provides comparisons on three learning parameters of learning affectivity, goal orientation and competition between Gen X & Millennials..\\n Methods: To study whether the learning attributes are similar or they differ across the two generations we compared the means of the three attributes under consideration. Results: We find Millennials to be different from Gen X across the three studied parameters suggesting that teaching pedagogies require a rethink for Millennials.\\nConclusions: These results could be useful in designing appropriate teaching pedagogies that are likely to improve Millennials’ learning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":368856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Issues and Ideas in Education\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Issues and Ideas in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15415/iie.2022.101001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issues and Ideas in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15415/iie.2022.101001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:有效的技能发展仍然是国家繁荣的重要手段。由于似乎对他们的上一代(X一代)有效的方法对千禧一代没有同样的效果,今天许多教育工作者正在试验有效培训千禧一代的教学法。在全球范围内,越来越明显的是,千禧一代接受高等教育的方式与他们的前辈非常不同。目的:本研究对X一代和千禧一代的学习情感、目标导向和竞争三个学习参数进行比较。方法:通过比较三种学习属性的均值,研究两代学生的学习属性是否相似或不同。结果:我们发现千禧一代在三个研究参数上与X一代不同,这表明千禧一代的教学方法需要重新思考。结论:这些结果可能有助于设计适当的教学方法,以提高千禧一代的学习水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Millennials in Higher Education: Do They Really Learn Differently
Background: Effective skill development remains an important vehicle for national prosperity. Aswhat appeared to work with their predecessor generation (Gen X) does not have the same results with Millennials many educators today are experimenting with pedagogies to effectively train Millennials. Globally, it is becoming evident that the Millennials in higher education learn very differently than their predecessors. Purpose: Our study provides comparisons on three learning parameters of learning affectivity, goal orientation and competition between Gen X & Millennials.. Methods: To study whether the learning attributes are similar or they differ across the two generations we compared the means of the three attributes under consideration. Results: We find Millennials to be different from Gen X across the three studied parameters suggesting that teaching pedagogies require a rethink for Millennials. Conclusions: These results could be useful in designing appropriate teaching pedagogies that are likely to improve Millennials’ learning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
School Closures: Facing Challenges of Learning Loss in India Physics Tutors’ Self-Efficacy and Use of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) for Research Activities in the Colleges of Education in Ghana Millennials in Higher Education: Do They Really Learn Differently National Education Policy 2020 - Mentoring of Faculty Members towards Excellence in Higher Education Institutions Assessing Social and Emotional Competencies of Undergraduates: A Cross-Cultural Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1