{"title":"大股东在公司债务期限结构中的作用","authors":"Zheyao Pan, Kelvin Jui Keng Tan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1912284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the impact of blockholders on the corporate debt maturity structure within the framework of agency theory. Using a novel and hand-collected dataset in Australia, we find support for our hypothesis that debt maturity is a concave function of block equity ownership. Our findings contribute to empirical evidence on the monitoring effects of blockholders and the use of debt maturity to control for debt-equity and manager-equity conflicts.","PeriodicalId":331246,"journal":{"name":"24th Australasian Finance & Banking Conference 2011 (Archive)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Blockholders in the Corporate Debt Maturity Structure\",\"authors\":\"Zheyao Pan, Kelvin Jui Keng Tan\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1912284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the impact of blockholders on the corporate debt maturity structure within the framework of agency theory. Using a novel and hand-collected dataset in Australia, we find support for our hypothesis that debt maturity is a concave function of block equity ownership. Our findings contribute to empirical evidence on the monitoring effects of blockholders and the use of debt maturity to control for debt-equity and manager-equity conflicts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":331246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"24th Australasian Finance & Banking Conference 2011 (Archive)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"24th Australasian Finance & Banking Conference 2011 (Archive)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1912284\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"24th Australasian Finance & Banking Conference 2011 (Archive)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1912284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Role of Blockholders in the Corporate Debt Maturity Structure
This paper examines the impact of blockholders on the corporate debt maturity structure within the framework of agency theory. Using a novel and hand-collected dataset in Australia, we find support for our hypothesis that debt maturity is a concave function of block equity ownership. Our findings contribute to empirical evidence on the monitoring effects of blockholders and the use of debt maturity to control for debt-equity and manager-equity conflicts.