巴西监管机构的创新:成功经验研究

Monaliza Ferreira Rodrigues de Paula, C. Filgueira, N. A. Silva
{"title":"巴西监管机构的创新:成功经验研究","authors":"Monaliza Ferreira Rodrigues de Paula, C. Filgueira, N. A. Silva","doi":"10.5902/1983465970718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: the study aims to expose the relationship between innovation and regulatory activities through the experiences of Brazilian regulatory agencies.Methodology: the study follows a bibliographical approach, adopting bibliographical and documentary research and collecting data from academic publications, reports and information published on the Federal Government’s website.Findings: through this essay it was possible to perceive how innovation is indispensable to regulatory activities, in view of the benefits provided to agencies and, especially, the positive impacts for society.Research limitations: since this is a theoretical study, the relationship between innovation and regulatory activities was limited to the experiences shared in the researched sources. Given a certain deficit of approach to the subject in the prevailing literature, we believe that an in loco research would be a more robust source of information and, thus, other innovation actions, not shared in academic works and/or websites, would be identified.Originality/value: the study’s contributions permeate the universe of the link between innovation and regulatory agencies, demonstrating the relevance of innovative actions to ensure efficiency and effectiveness in public services, taking four Brazilian agencies as an example. The absence of research on innovation in regulatory agencies at the national level characterizes the originality of the work. It is suggested, therefore, that regulatory agencies systematize their information on innovation actions and make it available to the public, in the form of a report, presenting the results achieved and the benefits acquired.","PeriodicalId":197586,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Administração da UFSM","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Innovation in Brazilian regulatory agencies: a study of successful experiences\",\"authors\":\"Monaliza Ferreira Rodrigues de Paula, C. Filgueira, N. A. Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.5902/1983465970718\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: the study aims to expose the relationship between innovation and regulatory activities through the experiences of Brazilian regulatory agencies.Methodology: the study follows a bibliographical approach, adopting bibliographical and documentary research and collecting data from academic publications, reports and information published on the Federal Government’s website.Findings: through this essay it was possible to perceive how innovation is indispensable to regulatory activities, in view of the benefits provided to agencies and, especially, the positive impacts for society.Research limitations: since this is a theoretical study, the relationship between innovation and regulatory activities was limited to the experiences shared in the researched sources. Given a certain deficit of approach to the subject in the prevailing literature, we believe that an in loco research would be a more robust source of information and, thus, other innovation actions, not shared in academic works and/or websites, would be identified.Originality/value: the study’s contributions permeate the universe of the link between innovation and regulatory agencies, demonstrating the relevance of innovative actions to ensure efficiency and effectiveness in public services, taking four Brazilian agencies as an example. The absence of research on innovation in regulatory agencies at the national level characterizes the originality of the work. It is suggested, therefore, that regulatory agencies systematize their information on innovation actions and make it available to the public, in the form of a report, presenting the results achieved and the benefits acquired.\",\"PeriodicalId\":197586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Administração da UFSM\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Administração da UFSM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465970718\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Administração da UFSM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465970718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在通过巴西监管机构的经验揭示创新与监管活动之间的关系。方法:该研究采用参考文献方法,采用参考文献和文献研究,并从联邦政府网站上发表的学术出版物、报告和信息中收集数据。研究发现:通过这篇文章,我们有可能认识到创新对监管活动是如何不可或缺的,鉴于它给机构带来的好处,尤其是对社会的积极影响。研究局限性:由于这是一项理论研究,创新与监管活动之间的关系仅限于研究来源中共享的经验。鉴于主流文献中对该主题的研究方法存在一定的不足,我们认为,就地研究将是一个更可靠的信息来源,因此,其他未在学术著作和/或网站上共享的创新行动将被识别出来。原创性/价值:该研究的贡献渗透到创新与监管机构之间的联系的领域,展示了创新行动对确保公共服务的效率和效力的相关性,并以巴西的四个机构为例。在国家层面上缺乏对监管机构创新的研究,这是这项工作独创性的特点。因此,建议监管机构将其关于创新行动的信息系统化,并以报告的形式向公众提供,说明取得的成果和获得的利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Innovation in Brazilian regulatory agencies: a study of successful experiences
Objective: the study aims to expose the relationship between innovation and regulatory activities through the experiences of Brazilian regulatory agencies.Methodology: the study follows a bibliographical approach, adopting bibliographical and documentary research and collecting data from academic publications, reports and information published on the Federal Government’s website.Findings: through this essay it was possible to perceive how innovation is indispensable to regulatory activities, in view of the benefits provided to agencies and, especially, the positive impacts for society.Research limitations: since this is a theoretical study, the relationship between innovation and regulatory activities was limited to the experiences shared in the researched sources. Given a certain deficit of approach to the subject in the prevailing literature, we believe that an in loco research would be a more robust source of information and, thus, other innovation actions, not shared in academic works and/or websites, would be identified.Originality/value: the study’s contributions permeate the universe of the link between innovation and regulatory agencies, demonstrating the relevance of innovative actions to ensure efficiency and effectiveness in public services, taking four Brazilian agencies as an example. The absence of research on innovation in regulatory agencies at the national level characterizes the originality of the work. It is suggested, therefore, that regulatory agencies systematize their information on innovation actions and make it available to the public, in the form of a report, presenting the results achieved and the benefits acquired.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Let’s get some food! The influence of marital status on the attributes’ perception of food delivery applications Scale of competencies for sustainability at the organizational scope The challenges of connecting situational leadership and emotional intelligence Understanding Smart Cities: A Systematic Review Economia circular e práticas sustentáveis adotadas por agricultores familiares
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1