刑罚与行政立法的共同实施

{"title":"刑罚与行政立法的共同实施","authors":"","doi":"10.37075/isa.2022.2.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The complete separation of administrative and criminal law was achieved in the 1950s and 1960s. Thus, administrative legislation is liberated from the limitations of criminal law. Presently the former’s achievements question the rule of law by combining administrative and criminal responsibility, corporate liability, and collateral consequences of criminal conviction. Law is a unitary system and its division into branches shouldn’t create possibilities for breaking its principles.","PeriodicalId":435790,"journal":{"name":"Economic and social alternatives","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bis in idem by Joint Implementation of Penal and Administrative Legislation\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.37075/isa.2022.2.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The complete separation of administrative and criminal law was achieved in the 1950s and 1960s. Thus, administrative legislation is liberated from the limitations of criminal law. Presently the former’s achievements question the rule of law by combining administrative and criminal responsibility, corporate liability, and collateral consequences of criminal conviction. Law is a unitary system and its division into branches shouldn’t create possibilities for breaking its principles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":435790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic and social alternatives\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic and social alternatives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37075/isa.2022.2.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic and social alternatives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37075/isa.2022.2.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

行政法和刑法的完全分离是在20世纪50年代和60年代实现的。从而使行政立法从刑法的限制中解放出来。目前,前者的成就对行政与刑事责任、公司责任和刑事定罪附带后果相结合的法治提出了质疑。法律是一个统一的系统,它的分支不应该创造破坏其原则的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bis in idem by Joint Implementation of Penal and Administrative Legislation
The complete separation of administrative and criminal law was achieved in the 1950s and 1960s. Thus, administrative legislation is liberated from the limitations of criminal law. Presently the former’s achievements question the rule of law by combining administrative and criminal responsibility, corporate liability, and collateral consequences of criminal conviction. Law is a unitary system and its division into branches shouldn’t create possibilities for breaking its principles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Transformation of the Administrative Service Model in the Local Administration Efficiency of Production Factors Concerning the Gross Value Added in Bulgaria Analysis of Bilateral Trade between Bulgaria and Ukraine About Personalized Education in Accounting Subjects in Higher Education Institutions Macroeconomic Health Shocks and Business Cycle Dynamics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1