股票市场金融变量的脑活动跟踪

A. D. da Rocha, J. Vieito, F. Rocha
{"title":"股票市场金融变量的脑活动跟踪","authors":"A. D. da Rocha, J. Vieito, F. Rocha","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2329873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Efficiency Market hypothesis assume that all investors reason in the same way to make their financial decisions. In contrast, Neurosciences have provided strong evidences that cognitive diversity is the hallmark of human intelligence. Neurofinances has shown that volunteers learned different profitable financial decision-making strategies depending on the kind of market they begun to trade. Here, we decide to further explore this hypothesis by studying a possible correlation between brain activity and the financial variables in a stock market game and to test if this correlation differ between experimental groups that trade in different market conditions. Present results show that volunteers had different perceptions of the studied financial variables depending if they initially traded in a bear or a bull market. Our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that different neural circuits were learned to monitor the different financial variables studied here, depending on market conditions.","PeriodicalId":365298,"journal":{"name":"CSN: Business (Topic)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brain Activity Follow Up of Stock Market Financial Variables\",\"authors\":\"A. D. da Rocha, J. Vieito, F. Rocha\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2329873\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Efficiency Market hypothesis assume that all investors reason in the same way to make their financial decisions. In contrast, Neurosciences have provided strong evidences that cognitive diversity is the hallmark of human intelligence. Neurofinances has shown that volunteers learned different profitable financial decision-making strategies depending on the kind of market they begun to trade. Here, we decide to further explore this hypothesis by studying a possible correlation between brain activity and the financial variables in a stock market game and to test if this correlation differ between experimental groups that trade in different market conditions. Present results show that volunteers had different perceptions of the studied financial variables depending if they initially traded in a bear or a bull market. Our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that different neural circuits were learned to monitor the different financial variables studied here, depending on market conditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":365298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CSN: Business (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CSN: Business (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2329873\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CSN: Business (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2329873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

效率市场假说认为,所有投资者都以同样的方式进行财务决策。相反,神经科学提供了强有力的证据,证明认知多样性是人类智力的标志。神经金融表明,志愿者根据他们开始交易的市场类型,学会了不同的盈利财务决策策略。在这里,我们决定通过研究大脑活动与股票市场游戏中的金融变量之间可能的相关性来进一步探索这一假设,并检验在不同市场条件下交易的实验组之间是否存在这种相关性。目前的结果表明,志愿者对所研究的金融变量有不同的看法,这取决于他们最初是在熊市还是牛市中交易。我们的发现与假设是一致的,即不同的神经回路被学习来监控不同的金融变量,这取决于市场条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Brain Activity Follow Up of Stock Market Financial Variables
Efficiency Market hypothesis assume that all investors reason in the same way to make their financial decisions. In contrast, Neurosciences have provided strong evidences that cognitive diversity is the hallmark of human intelligence. Neurofinances has shown that volunteers learned different profitable financial decision-making strategies depending on the kind of market they begun to trade. Here, we decide to further explore this hypothesis by studying a possible correlation between brain activity and the financial variables in a stock market game and to test if this correlation differ between experimental groups that trade in different market conditions. Present results show that volunteers had different perceptions of the studied financial variables depending if they initially traded in a bear or a bull market. Our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that different neural circuits were learned to monitor the different financial variables studied here, depending on market conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Temporal Reframing Elicitations Can Improve the Emergency Savings Intentions of Gig Workers Pharmaceutical Lottery Stocks: Investors’ Reaction to FDA Announcements Review Studies: Lifestyle and Social Class in Consumer Behavior for Services Industries Market Distraction and Near-Zero Volatility Persistence Do Preferences for Private Labels Respond to Supermarket Loyalty Programs?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1