稳健和选择性不可抵赖性(TLS)

Srdjan Capkun, Ercan Ozturk, Gene Tsudik, Karl Wüst
{"title":"稳健和选择性不可抵赖性(TLS)","authors":"Srdjan Capkun, Ercan Ozturk, Gene Tsudik, Karl Wüst","doi":"10.1145/3474123.3486763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A versatile non-repudiation service that can be used directly and without application-specific modifications is desirable in many realistic use-cases. Since TLS is one of the most popular current means of secure communication, several proposals have been made for augmenting it with a general, flexible and efficient non-repudiation service. However, none of them offers sufficient robustness for scenarios that require high reliability. Also, they lack flexibility by requiring the party providing non-repudiable evidence to do so for all content transmitted within a given TLS session. In this paper, we propose ROSEN, an extension for TLS that provides non-repudiation using an efficient checkpointing mechanism that minimizes loss of evidence in the presence of faults in order to increase robustness and ensure reliability. In addition, ROSEN inherits privacy-preserving properties of prior methods and introduces selective non-repudiation which allows the party providing non-repudiable evidence to selectively and efficiently redact parts of the session so as to make them repudiable.","PeriodicalId":109533,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2021 on Cloud Computing Security Workshop","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ROSEN: RObust and SElective Non-repudiation (for TLS)\",\"authors\":\"Srdjan Capkun, Ercan Ozturk, Gene Tsudik, Karl Wüst\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3474123.3486763\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A versatile non-repudiation service that can be used directly and without application-specific modifications is desirable in many realistic use-cases. Since TLS is one of the most popular current means of secure communication, several proposals have been made for augmenting it with a general, flexible and efficient non-repudiation service. However, none of them offers sufficient robustness for scenarios that require high reliability. Also, they lack flexibility by requiring the party providing non-repudiable evidence to do so for all content transmitted within a given TLS session. In this paper, we propose ROSEN, an extension for TLS that provides non-repudiation using an efficient checkpointing mechanism that minimizes loss of evidence in the presence of faults in order to increase robustness and ensure reliability. In addition, ROSEN inherits privacy-preserving properties of prior methods and introduces selective non-repudiation which allows the party providing non-repudiable evidence to selectively and efficiently redact parts of the session so as to make them repudiable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":109533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2021 on Cloud Computing Security Workshop\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2021 on Cloud Computing Security Workshop\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3474123.3486763\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2021 on Cloud Computing Security Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3474123.3486763","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

在许多实际用例中,可以直接使用且无需特定于应用程序的修改的通用不可否认服务是理想的。由于TLS是当前最流行的安全通信手段之一,因此已经提出了一些建议,以便通过通用、灵活和高效的不可否认服务对其进行扩展。然而,它们都不能为需要高可靠性的场景提供足够的健壮性。此外,它们缺乏灵活性,要求提供不可否认证据的一方对给定TLS会话中传输的所有内容都这样做。在本文中,我们提出了ROSEN,这是TLS的扩展,它使用有效的检查点机制提供不可否认性,该机制可以最大限度地减少存在错误时的证据损失,从而提高鲁棒性并确保可靠性。此外,ROSEN继承了先前方法的隐私保护特性,并引入了选择性不可否认性,允许提供不可否认证据的一方有选择地有效地编辑部分会话,使其不可否认。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ROSEN: RObust and SElective Non-repudiation (for TLS)
A versatile non-repudiation service that can be used directly and without application-specific modifications is desirable in many realistic use-cases. Since TLS is one of the most popular current means of secure communication, several proposals have been made for augmenting it with a general, flexible and efficient non-repudiation service. However, none of them offers sufficient robustness for scenarios that require high reliability. Also, they lack flexibility by requiring the party providing non-repudiable evidence to do so for all content transmitted within a given TLS session. In this paper, we propose ROSEN, an extension for TLS that provides non-repudiation using an efficient checkpointing mechanism that minimizes loss of evidence in the presence of faults in order to increase robustness and ensure reliability. In addition, ROSEN inherits privacy-preserving properties of prior methods and introduces selective non-repudiation which allows the party providing non-repudiable evidence to selectively and efficiently redact parts of the session so as to make them repudiable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ACCO: Algebraic Computation with Comparison Proceedings of the 2021 on Cloud Computing Security Workshop Live Migration of Operating System Containers in Encrypted Virtual Machines Programmable Security in the Age of Software-Defined Infrastructure m-Stability: Threshold Security Meets Transferable Utility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1