放射状角膜切开术对角膜内皮的损伤。

L Bergmann, C Hartmann, G Renard, J J Saragoussi, Y Pouliquen
{"title":"放射状角膜切开术对角膜内皮的损伤。","authors":"L Bergmann,&nbsp;C Hartmann,&nbsp;G Renard,&nbsp;J J Saragoussi,&nbsp;Y Pouliquen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In our experimental study on 53 rabbits we compared the amount of corneal endothelial damage caused by radial keratotomy (RK) referred to (1) the number of incisions (4, 8, or 16), (2) the postoperative interval (0 h, 48 h) and (3) the direction of the incision [centripetal (cp), centrifugal (cf)]. The endothelial damage was quantified by means of the Janus green photometry technique. Morphological changes were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Depending on the group examined, we found endothelial damage extending over 3-7% of an analysed surface of 64 mm2. One perforation caused endothelial damage of up to 17% of the surface examined. Increasing the number of incisions from 4 to 8 or 16 resulted in a statistically significant increase in the amount of endothelial damage (4.2%, 5.1%, 5.8%; P less than 0.05). At 0 h it was significantly higher than after 48 h (5.5%, 4.6%; P less than 0.05). The direction of the incision had no statistically significant influence in our study (zp: 5.2%, zf: 4.9%). The morphological changes in the rabbit corneal endothelium examined directly after the RK procedure were ruptures in the cell membranes, loss of cells, and posterior corneal protrusions beneath the incisions. After 48 h, we found fewer damaged cells and no denuded Descemet's membranes, but larger polymorphy of the cells and a numerical increase in the microvilli of the cells surrounding the damaged cells. Our results support the crucial argument against RK: the alteration and destabilization of healthy corneal tissue up to the endothelium.</p>","PeriodicalId":12437,"journal":{"name":"Fortschritte der Ophthalmologie : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft","volume":"88 4","pages":"368-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Damage to the corneal endothelium caused by radial keratotomy].\",\"authors\":\"L Bergmann,&nbsp;C Hartmann,&nbsp;G Renard,&nbsp;J J Saragoussi,&nbsp;Y Pouliquen\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In our experimental study on 53 rabbits we compared the amount of corneal endothelial damage caused by radial keratotomy (RK) referred to (1) the number of incisions (4, 8, or 16), (2) the postoperative interval (0 h, 48 h) and (3) the direction of the incision [centripetal (cp), centrifugal (cf)]. The endothelial damage was quantified by means of the Janus green photometry technique. Morphological changes were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Depending on the group examined, we found endothelial damage extending over 3-7% of an analysed surface of 64 mm2. One perforation caused endothelial damage of up to 17% of the surface examined. Increasing the number of incisions from 4 to 8 or 16 resulted in a statistically significant increase in the amount of endothelial damage (4.2%, 5.1%, 5.8%; P less than 0.05). At 0 h it was significantly higher than after 48 h (5.5%, 4.6%; P less than 0.05). The direction of the incision had no statistically significant influence in our study (zp: 5.2%, zf: 4.9%). The morphological changes in the rabbit corneal endothelium examined directly after the RK procedure were ruptures in the cell membranes, loss of cells, and posterior corneal protrusions beneath the incisions. After 48 h, we found fewer damaged cells and no denuded Descemet's membranes, but larger polymorphy of the cells and a numerical increase in the microvilli of the cells surrounding the damaged cells. Our results support the crucial argument against RK: the alteration and destabilization of healthy corneal tissue up to the endothelium.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fortschritte der Ophthalmologie : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft\",\"volume\":\"88 4\",\"pages\":\"368-73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fortschritte der Ophthalmologie : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fortschritte der Ophthalmologie : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在我们对53只兔子的实验研究中,我们比较了径向角膜切开术(RK)引起的角膜内皮损伤量,这涉及到(1)切口数量(4,8或16),(2)术后间隔(0小时,48小时)和(3)切口方向[向心(cp),离心(cf)]。采用Janus绿光度法定量观察内皮损伤。用扫描电镜观察其形态学变化。根据所检查的组,我们发现内皮损伤延伸超过64 mm2分析表面的3-7%。一个穿孔造成的内皮损伤高达所检查表面的17%。将切口数量从4个增加到8个或16个,内皮损伤量增加具有统计学意义(4.2%,5.1%,5.8%;P < 0.05)。0 h显著高于48 h (5.5%, 4.6%;P < 0.05)。在我们的研究中,切口方向无统计学意义(zp: 5.2%, zf: 4.9%)。RK手术后直接观察到兔角膜内皮的形态学变化为细胞膜破裂、细胞丢失和切口下方的角膜后突。48 h后,我们发现受损细胞较少,Descemet的膜没有脱落,但细胞的多态性更大,受损细胞周围的微绒毛数量增加。我们的研究结果支持了反对RK的关键论点:健康角膜组织直至内皮的改变和不稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Damage to the corneal endothelium caused by radial keratotomy].

In our experimental study on 53 rabbits we compared the amount of corneal endothelial damage caused by radial keratotomy (RK) referred to (1) the number of incisions (4, 8, or 16), (2) the postoperative interval (0 h, 48 h) and (3) the direction of the incision [centripetal (cp), centrifugal (cf)]. The endothelial damage was quantified by means of the Janus green photometry technique. Morphological changes were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Depending on the group examined, we found endothelial damage extending over 3-7% of an analysed surface of 64 mm2. One perforation caused endothelial damage of up to 17% of the surface examined. Increasing the number of incisions from 4 to 8 or 16 resulted in a statistically significant increase in the amount of endothelial damage (4.2%, 5.1%, 5.8%; P less than 0.05). At 0 h it was significantly higher than after 48 h (5.5%, 4.6%; P less than 0.05). The direction of the incision had no statistically significant influence in our study (zp: 5.2%, zf: 4.9%). The morphological changes in the rabbit corneal endothelium examined directly after the RK procedure were ruptures in the cell membranes, loss of cells, and posterior corneal protrusions beneath the incisions. After 48 h, we found fewer damaged cells and no denuded Descemet's membranes, but larger polymorphy of the cells and a numerical increase in the microvilli of the cells surrounding the damaged cells. Our results support the crucial argument against RK: the alteration and destabilization of healthy corneal tissue up to the endothelium.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Thermoradiotherapy for Malignant Choroidal Melanoma: The Development of a New Microwave Hyperthermia System [Planimetric follow-up of cytomegalovirus retinitis treated with ganciclovir in patients with AIDS]. [Detection of HCMV-DNA in aqueous humor for diagnostic confirmation of viral retinitis]. [Herpes simplex virus retinitis. Role of the immune system in the animal experiment]. [Electro-ophthalmologic studies in HIV patients].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1