{"title":"不确定调度下的概率算法分析","authors":"J. Beauquier, C. Johnen","doi":"10.1109/ISPA.2008.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a distributed system, the environment is described by the scheduler (also called adversary or demon). Through an example related to stabilization, we show that a formal proof that does not use a formal definition of a scheduler is pointless. As a matter of fact, we show that the same algorithm, according to the scheduler, can be either correct or incorrect and in the cases where it is correct, can have different complexities. The paper is an attempt to better understand the meaning of proving a probabilistic algorithm in a indeterministic environment.","PeriodicalId":345341,"journal":{"name":"2008 IEEE International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing with Applications","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyze of Probabilistic Algorithms under Indeterministic Scheduler\",\"authors\":\"J. Beauquier, C. Johnen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISPA.2008.21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a distributed system, the environment is described by the scheduler (also called adversary or demon). Through an example related to stabilization, we show that a formal proof that does not use a formal definition of a scheduler is pointless. As a matter of fact, we show that the same algorithm, according to the scheduler, can be either correct or incorrect and in the cases where it is correct, can have different complexities. The paper is an attempt to better understand the meaning of proving a probabilistic algorithm in a indeterministic environment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":345341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 IEEE International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing with Applications\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 IEEE International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing with Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPA.2008.21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 IEEE International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing with Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPA.2008.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analyze of Probabilistic Algorithms under Indeterministic Scheduler
In a distributed system, the environment is described by the scheduler (also called adversary or demon). Through an example related to stabilization, we show that a formal proof that does not use a formal definition of a scheduler is pointless. As a matter of fact, we show that the same algorithm, according to the scheduler, can be either correct or incorrect and in the cases where it is correct, can have different complexities. The paper is an attempt to better understand the meaning of proving a probabilistic algorithm in a indeterministic environment.