内源性风险暴露与系统不稳定性

Chong Shu
{"title":"内源性风险暴露与系统不稳定性","authors":"Chong Shu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3076076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most research on financial systemic stability assumes an economy in which banks are subject \nto exogenous shocks, but in practice, banks choose their exposure to risk. This paper studies \nthe determinants of this endogenous risk exposure when banks are connected in a financial \nnetwork. I show that there exists a network risk-taking externality: connected banks’ choices \nof risk exposure are strategically complementary. Banks in financial networks, particularly \ndensely connected ones, endogenously expose to greater risks. Furthermore, they choose \ncorrelated risks, aggravating the systemic fragility. Banks, however, do have incentives to \nform networks to protect their charter values. The theory yields several novel perspectives on \npolicy debates.","PeriodicalId":319022,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Networks eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endogenous Risk-Exposure and Systemic Instability\",\"authors\":\"Chong Shu\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3076076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Most research on financial systemic stability assumes an economy in which banks are subject \\nto exogenous shocks, but in practice, banks choose their exposure to risk. This paper studies \\nthe determinants of this endogenous risk exposure when banks are connected in a financial \\nnetwork. I show that there exists a network risk-taking externality: connected banks’ choices \\nof risk exposure are strategically complementary. Banks in financial networks, particularly \\ndensely connected ones, endogenously expose to greater risks. Furthermore, they choose \\ncorrelated risks, aggravating the systemic fragility. Banks, however, do have incentives to \\nform networks to protect their charter values. The theory yields several novel perspectives on \\npolicy debates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":319022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics of Networks eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics of Networks eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3076076\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Networks eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3076076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

大多数关于金融系统稳定性的研究都假设银行会受到外生冲击,但在实践中,银行会选择自己的风险敞口。本文研究了当银行在金融网络中相互连接时,这种内生风险暴露的决定因素。我证明存在网络风险承担外部性:关联银行的风险敞口选择在战略上是互补的。金融网络中的银行,特别是联系紧密的银行,内在地面临着更大的风险。此外,他们选择相关风险,加剧了系统脆弱性。然而,银行确实有形成网络以保护其特许价值的动机。该理论为政策辩论提供了几个新颖的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Endogenous Risk-Exposure and Systemic Instability
Most research on financial systemic stability assumes an economy in which banks are subject to exogenous shocks, but in practice, banks choose their exposure to risk. This paper studies the determinants of this endogenous risk exposure when banks are connected in a financial network. I show that there exists a network risk-taking externality: connected banks’ choices of risk exposure are strategically complementary. Banks in financial networks, particularly densely connected ones, endogenously expose to greater risks. Furthermore, they choose correlated risks, aggravating the systemic fragility. Banks, however, do have incentives to form networks to protect their charter values. The theory yields several novel perspectives on policy debates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Education-Occupation Mismatch and Social Networks for Hispanics in the US: Role of Citizenship Monitoring Network Changes in Social Media Platform Liability and Innovation The Bipartisan Case for Labeling as a Content Moderation Method: Findings from a National Survey Dealer Networks and the Cost of Immediacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1