工程师从模型中提取需求的能力

R. Giachetti, Karen Holness, Mollie McGuire
{"title":"工程师从模型中提取需求的能力","authors":"R. Giachetti, Karen Holness, Mollie McGuire","doi":"10.1109/RE.2018.00-19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Department of Defense is adopting model-based systems engineering in which models will replace the extensive amounts of documentation generated in developing a new system. This research examines how this shift from textual description of requirements to a model-based description will effect the requirements engineering process. Specifically, we ask whether engineers will be able to extract the same understanding of the system requirements from the models as they can from the traditional textual requirements specifications. This paper describes the theory and related work on the understandability of models and the performance of cognitive tasks such as requirements engineering. Our research into model representation is part of a larger effort on a theory of model relativity postulating that models affect how we think about the system of interest. In this paper, we present our exploratory research studies, discuss our research protocol, describe the research plan, and present the current status of our study.","PeriodicalId":445032,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE 26th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Ability of Engineers to Extract Requirements from Models\",\"authors\":\"R. Giachetti, Karen Holness, Mollie McGuire\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RE.2018.00-19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Department of Defense is adopting model-based systems engineering in which models will replace the extensive amounts of documentation generated in developing a new system. This research examines how this shift from textual description of requirements to a model-based description will effect the requirements engineering process. Specifically, we ask whether engineers will be able to extract the same understanding of the system requirements from the models as they can from the traditional textual requirements specifications. This paper describes the theory and related work on the understandability of models and the performance of cognitive tasks such as requirements engineering. Our research into model representation is part of a larger effort on a theory of model relativity postulating that models affect how we think about the system of interest. In this paper, we present our exploratory research studies, discuss our research protocol, describe the research plan, and present the current status of our study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":445032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE 26th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE 26th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2018.00-19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE 26th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2018.00-19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

国防部正在采用基于模型的系统工程,其中模型将取代开发新系统时生成的大量文档。本研究考察了从需求的文本描述到基于模型的描述的转变将如何影响需求工程过程。具体地说,我们询问工程师是否能够从模型中提取对系统需求的理解,就像他们从传统的文本需求规格说明中提取的一样。本文描述了模型可理解性和认知任务(如需求工程)性能方面的理论和相关工作。我们对模型表示的研究是模型相对性理论的一部分,模型相对性假设模型影响我们对感兴趣的系统的看法。在本文中,我们介绍了我们的探索性研究,讨论了我们的研究方案,描述了研究计划,并介绍了我们的研究现状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Ability of Engineers to Extract Requirements from Models
The Department of Defense is adopting model-based systems engineering in which models will replace the extensive amounts of documentation generated in developing a new system. This research examines how this shift from textual description of requirements to a model-based description will effect the requirements engineering process. Specifically, we ask whether engineers will be able to extract the same understanding of the system requirements from the models as they can from the traditional textual requirements specifications. This paper describes the theory and related work on the understandability of models and the performance of cognitive tasks such as requirements engineering. Our research into model representation is part of a larger effort on a theory of model relativity postulating that models affect how we think about the system of interest. In this paper, we present our exploratory research studies, discuss our research protocol, describe the research plan, and present the current status of our study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CaRE: A Refinement Calculus for Requirements Engineering Based on Argumentation Semantics The Grace Period Has Ended: An Approach to Operationalize GDPR Requirements The Manager Perspective on Requirements Impact on Automotive Systems Development Speed Data Driven Requirements Engineering: Implications for the Community [Publisher's information]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1