衡量银行倒闭对实体经济的影响:一个欧盟范围内的分析框架

V. Vacca, F. Bichlmeier, Paolo Biraschi, Natalie Boschi, Antonio Bravo, Luciano Di Primio, Andrea Ebner, Silvia Hoeretzeder, Elisa Llorente Ballesteros, Claudia Miani, Giacomo Ricci, R. Santioni, Stefan Schellerer, Hanna Westman
{"title":"衡量银行倒闭对实体经济的影响:一个欧盟范围内的分析框架","authors":"V. Vacca, F. Bichlmeier, Paolo Biraschi, Natalie Boschi, Antonio Bravo, Luciano Di Primio, Andrea Ebner, Silvia Hoeretzeder, Elisa Llorente Ballesteros, Claudia Miani, Giacomo Ricci, R. Santioni, Stefan Schellerer, Hanna Westman","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3891642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The crisis management framework for banks in the European Union (EU) requires the resolution authorities to identify the existence of a public interest to resolve an ailing bank, rather than to open normal insolvency proceedings (NIPs). The Public Interest Assessment (PIA) determines whether resolution objectives, including the safeguard of financial stability, can be better preserved using resolution tools than NIPs .This paper provides a contribution to the ongoing discussion on the implementation of the PIA, by presenting an analytical framework to quantify the potential impact on the real economy stemming from a bank’s failure under NIPs through the interruption of the lending activity (“credit channel”). The framework is harmonized across the jurisdictions belonging to the Banking Union and aims to improve the quantitative leg of the PIA, to be coupled with qualitative elements. In a first step, we quantify the potential credit shortfall faced by firms and households due to the abrupt closure of a bank. In a second step, the impact of the credit shortfall on real outcomes is estimated via a FAVAR model and via a micro-econometric model. Reference values are provided to assess the relevance of the estimated outcomes. The illustrative results show that such a harmonized approach can be applied across the Banking Union and to banks of heterogeneous size. In case of mid-sized banks, this common analytical framework could reduce the uncertainty regarding the extent to which the failure of the institution could have a negative impact to the real economy if the lending activity is interrupted as possibly the case under NIPs.","PeriodicalId":331807,"journal":{"name":"Banking & Insurance eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring the Impact of a Bank Failure on the Real Economy: An EU-Wide Analytical Framework\",\"authors\":\"V. Vacca, F. Bichlmeier, Paolo Biraschi, Natalie Boschi, Antonio Bravo, Luciano Di Primio, Andrea Ebner, Silvia Hoeretzeder, Elisa Llorente Ballesteros, Claudia Miani, Giacomo Ricci, R. Santioni, Stefan Schellerer, Hanna Westman\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3891642\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The crisis management framework for banks in the European Union (EU) requires the resolution authorities to identify the existence of a public interest to resolve an ailing bank, rather than to open normal insolvency proceedings (NIPs). The Public Interest Assessment (PIA) determines whether resolution objectives, including the safeguard of financial stability, can be better preserved using resolution tools than NIPs .This paper provides a contribution to the ongoing discussion on the implementation of the PIA, by presenting an analytical framework to quantify the potential impact on the real economy stemming from a bank’s failure under NIPs through the interruption of the lending activity (“credit channel”). The framework is harmonized across the jurisdictions belonging to the Banking Union and aims to improve the quantitative leg of the PIA, to be coupled with qualitative elements. In a first step, we quantify the potential credit shortfall faced by firms and households due to the abrupt closure of a bank. In a second step, the impact of the credit shortfall on real outcomes is estimated via a FAVAR model and via a micro-econometric model. Reference values are provided to assess the relevance of the estimated outcomes. The illustrative results show that such a harmonized approach can be applied across the Banking Union and to banks of heterogeneous size. In case of mid-sized banks, this common analytical framework could reduce the uncertainty regarding the extent to which the failure of the institution could have a negative impact to the real economy if the lending activity is interrupted as possibly the case under NIPs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":331807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Banking & Insurance eJournal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Banking & Insurance eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3891642\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Banking & Insurance eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3891642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧盟(EU)银行危机管理框架要求处置机构确定存在公共利益来处置陷入困境的银行,而不是启动正常的破产程序(NIPs)。公共利益评估(PIA)决定了解决目标,包括维护金融稳定,是否可以使用解决工具比NIPs更好地维护。本文提供了一个分析框架,量化银行在NIPs下破产对实体经济的潜在影响,通过中断贷款活动(“信贷渠道”),对PIA实施的持续讨论做出了贡献。该框架在属于银行联盟的司法管辖区之间进行协调,旨在改善PIA的定量依据,并与定性要素相结合。首先,我们量化了企业和家庭因银行突然关闭而面临的潜在信贷短缺。第二步,通过FAVAR模型和微观计量模型估计信贷短缺对实际结果的影响。提供参考值以评估估计结果的相关性。说明性结果表明,这种协调的方法可以应用于整个银行业联盟和不同规模的银行。对于中等规模的银行,如果贷款活动中断,这种共同的分析框架可以减少机构倒闭对实体经济可能产生负面影响程度的不确定性,就像NIPs下的情况一样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Measuring the Impact of a Bank Failure on the Real Economy: An EU-Wide Analytical Framework
The crisis management framework for banks in the European Union (EU) requires the resolution authorities to identify the existence of a public interest to resolve an ailing bank, rather than to open normal insolvency proceedings (NIPs). The Public Interest Assessment (PIA) determines whether resolution objectives, including the safeguard of financial stability, can be better preserved using resolution tools than NIPs .This paper provides a contribution to the ongoing discussion on the implementation of the PIA, by presenting an analytical framework to quantify the potential impact on the real economy stemming from a bank’s failure under NIPs through the interruption of the lending activity (“credit channel”). The framework is harmonized across the jurisdictions belonging to the Banking Union and aims to improve the quantitative leg of the PIA, to be coupled with qualitative elements. In a first step, we quantify the potential credit shortfall faced by firms and households due to the abrupt closure of a bank. In a second step, the impact of the credit shortfall on real outcomes is estimated via a FAVAR model and via a micro-econometric model. Reference values are provided to assess the relevance of the estimated outcomes. The illustrative results show that such a harmonized approach can be applied across the Banking Union and to banks of heterogeneous size. In case of mid-sized banks, this common analytical framework could reduce the uncertainty regarding the extent to which the failure of the institution could have a negative impact to the real economy if the lending activity is interrupted as possibly the case under NIPs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Wealth Management Products, Banking Competition, and Stability: Evidence from China Mirco-level Prediction of Outstanding Claim Counts using Neural Networks Lending Competition, Regulation and Non-Traditional Mortgages PE for the Public: The Rise of SPACs Lawmaking Without Law: How Overreliance on Economics Fails Financial Regulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1