12. 韩国残障政策领域的法律动员与国家-社会关系转型

Celeste L. Arrington
{"title":"12. 韩国残障政策领域的法律动员与国家-社会关系转型","authors":"Celeste L. Arrington","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv12sdvjk.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the 1990s, South Koreans have gained better access to the courts as a\n channel for pursuing social and policy change. In particular, Koreans with\n disabilities began using the courts to challenge discrimination, enforce\n their rights, and influence policymaking. Through qualitative comparative\n analysis of recent legal mobilization by Koreans with disabilities, this\n chapter investigates factors that influence when and why people mobilize\n the law. Drawing on sociolegal and social movement theories, it shows\n that explanations focused on evolving legal opportunity structures –\n encompassing procedural rules, statutes, and legal interpretations – can\n only partly explain changing patterns in legal mobilization. Explanations\n should also consider the ‘support structures’ for legal mobilization: lawyers,\n advocacy organizations, and funding.","PeriodicalId":148986,"journal":{"name":"Civil Society and the State in Democratic East Asia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"12. Legal Mobilization and the Transformation of State-Society Relations in South Korea in the Realm of Disability Policy\",\"authors\":\"Celeste L. Arrington\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctv12sdvjk.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the 1990s, South Koreans have gained better access to the courts as a\\n channel for pursuing social and policy change. In particular, Koreans with\\n disabilities began using the courts to challenge discrimination, enforce\\n their rights, and influence policymaking. Through qualitative comparative\\n analysis of recent legal mobilization by Koreans with disabilities, this\\n chapter investigates factors that influence when and why people mobilize\\n the law. Drawing on sociolegal and social movement theories, it shows\\n that explanations focused on evolving legal opportunity structures –\\n encompassing procedural rules, statutes, and legal interpretations – can\\n only partly explain changing patterns in legal mobilization. Explanations\\n should also consider the ‘support structures’ for legal mobilization: lawyers,\\n advocacy organizations, and funding.\",\"PeriodicalId\":148986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Civil Society and the State in Democratic East Asia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Civil Society and the State in Democratic East Asia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv12sdvjk.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civil Society and the State in Democratic East Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv12sdvjk.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自上世纪90年代以来,韩国人更容易通过法院寻求社会和政策变革。特别是,韩国残疾人开始利用法院来挑战歧视,行使他们的权利,并影响政策制定。通过对最近韩国残疾人法律动员的定性比较分析,本章调查了影响人们何时以及为什么动员法律的因素。根据社会法和社会运动理论,研究表明,侧重于不断演变的法律机会结构的解释——包括程序规则、法规和法律解释——只能部分解释法律动员模式的变化。解释还应考虑法律动员的“支持结构”:律师、倡导组织和资金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
12. Legal Mobilization and the Transformation of State-Society Relations in South Korea in the Realm of Disability Policy
Since the 1990s, South Koreans have gained better access to the courts as a channel for pursuing social and policy change. In particular, Koreans with disabilities began using the courts to challenge discrimination, enforce their rights, and influence policymaking. Through qualitative comparative analysis of recent legal mobilization by Koreans with disabilities, this chapter investigates factors that influence when and why people mobilize the law. Drawing on sociolegal and social movement theories, it shows that explanations focused on evolving legal opportunity structures – encompassing procedural rules, statutes, and legal interpretations – can only partly explain changing patterns in legal mobilization. Explanations should also consider the ‘support structures’ for legal mobilization: lawyers, advocacy organizations, and funding.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Frontmatter 8. New Immigration, Civic Activism and Identity in Japan. Influencing the ‘Strong’ State 9. Japanese NPOs and the State Re-examined. Reflections Eighteen Years On Index List of Illustrations and Tables
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1