{"title":"12. 韩国残障政策领域的法律动员与国家-社会关系转型","authors":"Celeste L. Arrington","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv12sdvjk.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the 1990s, South Koreans have gained better access to the courts as a\n channel for pursuing social and policy change. In particular, Koreans with\n disabilities began using the courts to challenge discrimination, enforce\n their rights, and influence policymaking. Through qualitative comparative\n analysis of recent legal mobilization by Koreans with disabilities, this\n chapter investigates factors that influence when and why people mobilize\n the law. Drawing on sociolegal and social movement theories, it shows\n that explanations focused on evolving legal opportunity structures –\n encompassing procedural rules, statutes, and legal interpretations – can\n only partly explain changing patterns in legal mobilization. Explanations\n should also consider the ‘support structures’ for legal mobilization: lawyers,\n advocacy organizations, and funding.","PeriodicalId":148986,"journal":{"name":"Civil Society and the State in Democratic East Asia","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"12. Legal Mobilization and the Transformation of State-Society Relations in South Korea in the Realm of Disability Policy\",\"authors\":\"Celeste L. Arrington\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctv12sdvjk.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the 1990s, South Koreans have gained better access to the courts as a\\n channel for pursuing social and policy change. In particular, Koreans with\\n disabilities began using the courts to challenge discrimination, enforce\\n their rights, and influence policymaking. Through qualitative comparative\\n analysis of recent legal mobilization by Koreans with disabilities, this\\n chapter investigates factors that influence when and why people mobilize\\n the law. Drawing on sociolegal and social movement theories, it shows\\n that explanations focused on evolving legal opportunity structures –\\n encompassing procedural rules, statutes, and legal interpretations – can\\n only partly explain changing patterns in legal mobilization. Explanations\\n should also consider the ‘support structures’ for legal mobilization: lawyers,\\n advocacy organizations, and funding.\",\"PeriodicalId\":148986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Civil Society and the State in Democratic East Asia\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Civil Society and the State in Democratic East Asia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv12sdvjk.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civil Society and the State in Democratic East Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv12sdvjk.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
12. Legal Mobilization and the Transformation of State-Society Relations in South Korea in the Realm of Disability Policy
Since the 1990s, South Koreans have gained better access to the courts as a
channel for pursuing social and policy change. In particular, Koreans with
disabilities began using the courts to challenge discrimination, enforce
their rights, and influence policymaking. Through qualitative comparative
analysis of recent legal mobilization by Koreans with disabilities, this
chapter investigates factors that influence when and why people mobilize
the law. Drawing on sociolegal and social movement theories, it shows
that explanations focused on evolving legal opportunity structures –
encompassing procedural rules, statutes, and legal interpretations – can
only partly explain changing patterns in legal mobilization. Explanations
should also consider the ‘support structures’ for legal mobilization: lawyers,
advocacy organizations, and funding.