安全检查器:在运行时检测处理器恶意包含

Michael Bilzor, Ted Huffmire, C. Irvine, T. Levin
{"title":"安全检查器:在运行时检测处理器恶意包含","authors":"Michael Bilzor, Ted Huffmire, C. Irvine, T. Levin","doi":"10.1109/HST.2011.5954992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To counter the growing threat of malicious subversions to the design of a microprocessor, there is a great need for simple, automated methods for detecting such malevolent changes. Based on the adoption of the Property Specification Language (PSL) for behavioral verification, and the advent of tools for automatically generating synthesizable hardware design language (HDL) constructs for verifying a PSL assertion, we propose a new method called Security Checkers, which uses security-focused PSL assertions to create hardware design units for detecting malicious inclusions at runtime. We describe the process flow for creating Security Checkers and demonstrate by example how they can be used to detect malicious inclusions in a processor design. Because the checkers can be used in simulation, FPGA emulation, or as part of a fabricated design, we illustrate how this technique can be used to detect malicious inclusions over a much broader segment of the processor development lifecycle, compared to existing methods.","PeriodicalId":300377,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE International Symposium on Hardware-Oriented Security and Trust","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"38","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Security Checkers: Detecting processor malicious inclusions at runtime\",\"authors\":\"Michael Bilzor, Ted Huffmire, C. Irvine, T. Levin\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HST.2011.5954992\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To counter the growing threat of malicious subversions to the design of a microprocessor, there is a great need for simple, automated methods for detecting such malevolent changes. Based on the adoption of the Property Specification Language (PSL) for behavioral verification, and the advent of tools for automatically generating synthesizable hardware design language (HDL) constructs for verifying a PSL assertion, we propose a new method called Security Checkers, which uses security-focused PSL assertions to create hardware design units for detecting malicious inclusions at runtime. We describe the process flow for creating Security Checkers and demonstrate by example how they can be used to detect malicious inclusions in a processor design. Because the checkers can be used in simulation, FPGA emulation, or as part of a fabricated design, we illustrate how this technique can be used to detect malicious inclusions over a much broader segment of the processor development lifecycle, compared to existing methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":300377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 IEEE International Symposium on Hardware-Oriented Security and Trust\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"38\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 IEEE International Symposium on Hardware-Oriented Security and Trust\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HST.2011.5954992\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE International Symposium on Hardware-Oriented Security and Trust","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HST.2011.5954992","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

摘要

为了对抗对微处理器设计的恶意颠覆日益增长的威胁,非常需要一种简单、自动化的方法来检测这种恶意更改。基于采用属性规范语言(PSL)进行行为验证,以及自动生成用于验证PSL断言的可合成硬件设计语言(HDL)构造的工具的出现,我们提出了一种称为安全检查器的新方法,该方法使用以安全为中心的PSL断言来创建硬件设计单元,以便在运行时检测恶意包含。我们描述了创建安全检查器的流程,并通过示例演示了如何使用它们来检测处理器设计中的恶意包含。由于检查器可用于仿真、FPGA仿真或作为制造设计的一部分,因此,与现有方法相比,我们将说明如何使用该技术在处理器开发生命周期的更广泛的范围内检测恶意包含。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Security Checkers: Detecting processor malicious inclusions at runtime
To counter the growing threat of malicious subversions to the design of a microprocessor, there is a great need for simple, automated methods for detecting such malevolent changes. Based on the adoption of the Property Specification Language (PSL) for behavioral verification, and the advent of tools for automatically generating synthesizable hardware design language (HDL) constructs for verifying a PSL assertion, we propose a new method called Security Checkers, which uses security-focused PSL assertions to create hardware design units for detecting malicious inclusions at runtime. We describe the process flow for creating Security Checkers and demonstrate by example how they can be used to detect malicious inclusions in a processor design. Because the checkers can be used in simulation, FPGA emulation, or as part of a fabricated design, we illustrate how this technique can be used to detect malicious inclusions over a much broader segment of the processor development lifecycle, compared to existing methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
TinyTPM: A lightweight module aimed to IP protection and trusted embedded platforms TrustGeM: Dynamic trusted environment generation for chip-multiprocessors Influence of the temperature on true random number generators A novel fault attack against ECDSA Placement of trust anchors in embedded computer systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1