下鼻甲复位技术治疗术后鼻出血和鼻塞的比较

Emily S. Sagalow, Vanessa Christopher, K. Gill, Raphael G. Banoub, S. Shankar, Madalyne Sunday, Tingting Zhan, Glen E D'Souza, J. Stanek, Michelle Hwang, R. Heffelfinger, Howard Krein
{"title":"下鼻甲复位技术治疗术后鼻出血和鼻塞的比较","authors":"Emily S. Sagalow, Vanessa Christopher, K. Gill, Raphael G. Banoub, S. Shankar, Madalyne Sunday, Tingting Zhan, Glen E D'Souza, J. Stanek, Michelle Hwang, R. Heffelfinger, Howard Krein","doi":"10.24983/scitemed.aohns.2022.00154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inferior turbinate hypertrophy is commonly found in patients with nasal obstruction and is often concurrent with septal deviation. Medical therapy for inferior turbinate hypertrophy includes an antihistamine or nasal decongestant spray [1]. If hypertrophied inferior turbinates are refractory to medical management, surgical reduction of the turbinates can be performed [2,3]. Several techniques exist for surgical inferior turbinate reduction. Submucous resection of the inferior turbinates involves removing the underlying bone and erectile tissue of the turbinates while sparing the mucosal tissue [4,5]. In contrast, partial excision of the inferior turbinates involves trimming portions of the inferior turbinate bone along with its overlying mucosa [4]. Both techniques are often performed in conjunction with outfracturing of the inferior turbinates, which lateralizes the entire turbinate structure and expands the internal nasal valve. Other surgical methods for inferior turbinate reduction include total turbinectomy, microdebrider removal, electrocautery, laser cautery, cryotherapy, and radiofrequency ablation [1,3-4,6-9]. Turbinate reduction surgery can be associated with adverse postoperative outcomes such as postoperative epistaxis, nasal congestion, infection, and nerve injury, and empty nose syndrome [4,10]. There is literature which comments on the rate of postoperative complications and the type of surgical technique utilized. For example, previous studies described rates of epistaxis to be 1.6% after submucous resection with a microdebrider and 5.8% after radical turbinectomy [9,11]. Other studies comment on nasal congestion: 96% of patients reported an improvement in nasal breathing two weeks after surgery, and 88% after two months, after undergoing bilateral inferior turbinate reduction. This was compared to 78% of patients who reported improvement after two weeks, and 76% after two months, after a submucosal diathermy turbinate reduction [12]. The purpose of this study was to compare two surgical techniques of inferior turbinate reduction, submucous resection versus partial excision, with their associated postoperative complications including epistaxis and recurrent nasal congestion in patients undergoing functional nasal surgery at a single academic center. To date, no other study has directly compared these two methods with endpoints of epistaxis and nasal congestion.","PeriodicalId":272593,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Inferior Turbinate Reduction Techniques on Postoperative Epistaxis and Nasal Congestion\",\"authors\":\"Emily S. Sagalow, Vanessa Christopher, K. Gill, Raphael G. Banoub, S. Shankar, Madalyne Sunday, Tingting Zhan, Glen E D'Souza, J. Stanek, Michelle Hwang, R. Heffelfinger, Howard Krein\",\"doi\":\"10.24983/scitemed.aohns.2022.00154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Inferior turbinate hypertrophy is commonly found in patients with nasal obstruction and is often concurrent with septal deviation. Medical therapy for inferior turbinate hypertrophy includes an antihistamine or nasal decongestant spray [1]. If hypertrophied inferior turbinates are refractory to medical management, surgical reduction of the turbinates can be performed [2,3]. Several techniques exist for surgical inferior turbinate reduction. Submucous resection of the inferior turbinates involves removing the underlying bone and erectile tissue of the turbinates while sparing the mucosal tissue [4,5]. In contrast, partial excision of the inferior turbinates involves trimming portions of the inferior turbinate bone along with its overlying mucosa [4]. Both techniques are often performed in conjunction with outfracturing of the inferior turbinates, which lateralizes the entire turbinate structure and expands the internal nasal valve. Other surgical methods for inferior turbinate reduction include total turbinectomy, microdebrider removal, electrocautery, laser cautery, cryotherapy, and radiofrequency ablation [1,3-4,6-9]. Turbinate reduction surgery can be associated with adverse postoperative outcomes such as postoperative epistaxis, nasal congestion, infection, and nerve injury, and empty nose syndrome [4,10]. There is literature which comments on the rate of postoperative complications and the type of surgical technique utilized. For example, previous studies described rates of epistaxis to be 1.6% after submucous resection with a microdebrider and 5.8% after radical turbinectomy [9,11]. Other studies comment on nasal congestion: 96% of patients reported an improvement in nasal breathing two weeks after surgery, and 88% after two months, after undergoing bilateral inferior turbinate reduction. This was compared to 78% of patients who reported improvement after two weeks, and 76% after two months, after a submucosal diathermy turbinate reduction [12]. The purpose of this study was to compare two surgical techniques of inferior turbinate reduction, submucous resection versus partial excision, with their associated postoperative complications including epistaxis and recurrent nasal congestion in patients undergoing functional nasal surgery at a single academic center. To date, no other study has directly compared these two methods with endpoints of epistaxis and nasal congestion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":272593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24983/scitemed.aohns.2022.00154\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24983/scitemed.aohns.2022.00154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

下鼻甲肥大常见于鼻塞患者,常伴有鼻中隔偏曲。下鼻甲肥大的药物治疗包括抗组胺药或鼻减充血剂喷雾[1]。如果下鼻甲肥大难以治疗,可以进行手术复位鼻甲[2,3]。手术下鼻甲复位有几种技术。下鼻甲粘膜下切除术包括切除下鼻甲骨和勃起组织,同时保留粘膜组织[4,5]。相比之下,部分切除下鼻甲需要切除部分下鼻甲骨及其上覆粘膜[4]。这两种技术通常与下鼻甲外裂一起进行,这将使整个鼻甲结构外侧化并扩大内鼻阀。下鼻甲复位的其他手术方法包括全鼻甲切除术、显微清氧器移除、电灼、激光烧灼、冷冻治疗和射频消融[1,3-4,6-9]。鼻甲复位手术可能与术后不良结局相关,如术后鼻出血、鼻塞、感染、神经损伤和空鼻综合征[4,10]。有文献评论了术后并发症的发生率和所采用的手术技术类型。例如,先前的研究表明,微清创器粘膜下切除术后鼻出血发生率为1.6%,根治性鼻甲切除术后为5.8%[9,11]。其他关于鼻塞的研究:96%的患者报告术后两周鼻呼吸改善,88%的患者报告术后两个月鼻呼吸改善,双侧下鼻甲复位。相比之下,78%的患者在两周后报告改善,76%的患者在两个月后报告改善,在粘膜下透热鼻甲复位后[12]。本研究的目的是比较两种下鼻甲复位手术技术,粘膜下切除术和部分切除术,以及在同一学术中心接受功能性鼻手术的患者的术后并发症,包括鼻出血和复发性鼻塞。迄今为止,还没有其他研究直接比较这两种方法与鼻出血和鼻塞的终点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Inferior Turbinate Reduction Techniques on Postoperative Epistaxis and Nasal Congestion
Inferior turbinate hypertrophy is commonly found in patients with nasal obstruction and is often concurrent with septal deviation. Medical therapy for inferior turbinate hypertrophy includes an antihistamine or nasal decongestant spray [1]. If hypertrophied inferior turbinates are refractory to medical management, surgical reduction of the turbinates can be performed [2,3]. Several techniques exist for surgical inferior turbinate reduction. Submucous resection of the inferior turbinates involves removing the underlying bone and erectile tissue of the turbinates while sparing the mucosal tissue [4,5]. In contrast, partial excision of the inferior turbinates involves trimming portions of the inferior turbinate bone along with its overlying mucosa [4]. Both techniques are often performed in conjunction with outfracturing of the inferior turbinates, which lateralizes the entire turbinate structure and expands the internal nasal valve. Other surgical methods for inferior turbinate reduction include total turbinectomy, microdebrider removal, electrocautery, laser cautery, cryotherapy, and radiofrequency ablation [1,3-4,6-9]. Turbinate reduction surgery can be associated with adverse postoperative outcomes such as postoperative epistaxis, nasal congestion, infection, and nerve injury, and empty nose syndrome [4,10]. There is literature which comments on the rate of postoperative complications and the type of surgical technique utilized. For example, previous studies described rates of epistaxis to be 1.6% after submucous resection with a microdebrider and 5.8% after radical turbinectomy [9,11]. Other studies comment on nasal congestion: 96% of patients reported an improvement in nasal breathing two weeks after surgery, and 88% after two months, after undergoing bilateral inferior turbinate reduction. This was compared to 78% of patients who reported improvement after two weeks, and 76% after two months, after a submucosal diathermy turbinate reduction [12]. The purpose of this study was to compare two surgical techniques of inferior turbinate reduction, submucous resection versus partial excision, with their associated postoperative complications including epistaxis and recurrent nasal congestion in patients undergoing functional nasal surgery at a single academic center. To date, no other study has directly compared these two methods with endpoints of epistaxis and nasal congestion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparable Specimens for Lipid-Laden Macrophage Index: Pediatric Tracheal Aspirate Versus Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Illness Perceptions, Psychological Distress and Coping Strategies as Predictors of Quality of Life After Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Need for Re-Classifying the Rare Condition of Ectopic Hamartomatous Thymoma Based on Tumor Analysis Dangers of a False Sense of Security in a Huge Mastoid Cholesteatoma With Skull Base Erosion and Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage The Utility of Barium Swallow Studies for Evaluation of Pharyngocutaneous Fistula After Total Laryngectomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1