软件团队中数据科学家之间的重用和共享策略

Will Epperson, Yi Wang, R. Deline, S. Drucker
{"title":"软件团队中数据科学家之间的重用和共享策略","authors":"Will Epperson, Yi Wang, R. Deline, S. Drucker","doi":"10.1145/3510457.3513042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Effective sharing and reuse practices have long been hallmarks of proficient software engineering. Yet the exploratory nature of data science presents new challenges and opportunities to support sharing and reuse of analysis code. To better understand current practices, we conducted interviews (N=17) and a survey (N=132) with data scientists at Microsoft, and extract five commonly used strategies for sharing and reuse of past work: personal analysis reuse, personal utility libraries, team shared analysis code, team shared template notebooks, and team shared libraries. We also identify factors that encourage or discourage data scientists from sharing and reusing. Our participants described obstacles to reuse and sharing including a lack of incentives to create shared code, difficulties in making data science code modular, and a lack of tool interoperability. We discuss how future tools might help meet these needs.","PeriodicalId":119790,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE/ACM 44th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategies for Reuse and Sharing among Data Scientists in Software Teams\",\"authors\":\"Will Epperson, Yi Wang, R. Deline, S. Drucker\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3510457.3513042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Effective sharing and reuse practices have long been hallmarks of proficient software engineering. Yet the exploratory nature of data science presents new challenges and opportunities to support sharing and reuse of analysis code. To better understand current practices, we conducted interviews (N=17) and a survey (N=132) with data scientists at Microsoft, and extract five commonly used strategies for sharing and reuse of past work: personal analysis reuse, personal utility libraries, team shared analysis code, team shared template notebooks, and team shared libraries. We also identify factors that encourage or discourage data scientists from sharing and reusing. Our participants described obstacles to reuse and sharing including a lack of incentives to create shared code, difficulties in making data science code modular, and a lack of tool interoperability. We discuss how future tools might help meet these needs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":119790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE/ACM 44th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE/ACM 44th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3510457.3513042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE/ACM 44th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3510457.3513042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

有效的共享和重用实践长期以来一直是精通软件工程的标志。然而,数据科学的探索性为支持分析代码的共享和重用提出了新的挑战和机遇。为了更好地理解当前的实践,我们对微软的数据科学家进行了访谈(N=17)和调查(N=132),并提取了五种常用的共享和重用过去工作的策略:个人分析重用、个人实用程序库、团队共享分析代码、团队共享模板笔记本和团队共享库。我们还确定了鼓励或阻碍数据科学家共享和重用的因素。我们的参与者描述了重用和共享的障碍,包括缺乏创建共享代码的激励,使数据科学代码模块化的困难,以及缺乏工具互操作性。我们将讨论未来的工具如何帮助满足这些需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Strategies for Reuse and Sharing among Data Scientists in Software Teams
Effective sharing and reuse practices have long been hallmarks of proficient software engineering. Yet the exploratory nature of data science presents new challenges and opportunities to support sharing and reuse of analysis code. To better understand current practices, we conducted interviews (N=17) and a survey (N=132) with data scientists at Microsoft, and extract five commonly used strategies for sharing and reuse of past work: personal analysis reuse, personal utility libraries, team shared analysis code, team shared template notebooks, and team shared libraries. We also identify factors that encourage or discourage data scientists from sharing and reusing. Our participants described obstacles to reuse and sharing including a lack of incentives to create shared code, difficulties in making data science code modular, and a lack of tool interoperability. We discuss how future tools might help meet these needs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Industry's Cry for Tools that Support Large-Scale Refactoring Code Reviewer Recommendation in Tencent: Practice, Challenge, and Direction* What's bothering developers in code review? The Impact of Flaky Tests on Historical Test Prioritization on Chrome Surveying the Developer Experience of Flaky Tests
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1