几种数字签名批量验证方法的性能分析

D. Guan, E. Zhuang, I. C. Chung, Yu-Shen Lin
{"title":"几种数字签名批量验证方法的性能分析","authors":"D. Guan, E. Zhuang, I. C. Chung, Yu-Shen Lin","doi":"10.1109/AsiaJCIS.2017.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we compare three methods in detecting invalid signatures in batch verification. The first method, randomly select test, randomly chooses a half of signatures to verify in a batch. The second method is the small exponent test which is widely used. The third method, randomly numbering test, is a simplified method of the matrix-detection algorithm. The randomly numbering test randomizes the order of the signatures and verifies the signatures in log k+1 batches where k is the number of signatures. We simulate each method and analyze the efficiency of the methods. As a result, randomly numbering test is more efficient than small exponent test when the number of signatures in a batch verification is large.","PeriodicalId":108636,"journal":{"name":"2017 12th Asia Joint Conference on Information Security (AsiaJCIS)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Analysis of Some Batch Verification Methods of Digital Signatures\",\"authors\":\"D. Guan, E. Zhuang, I. C. Chung, Yu-Shen Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AsiaJCIS.2017.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we compare three methods in detecting invalid signatures in batch verification. The first method, randomly select test, randomly chooses a half of signatures to verify in a batch. The second method is the small exponent test which is widely used. The third method, randomly numbering test, is a simplified method of the matrix-detection algorithm. The randomly numbering test randomizes the order of the signatures and verifies the signatures in log k+1 batches where k is the number of signatures. We simulate each method and analyze the efficiency of the methods. As a result, randomly numbering test is more efficient than small exponent test when the number of signatures in a batch verification is large.\",\"PeriodicalId\":108636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 12th Asia Joint Conference on Information Security (AsiaJCIS)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 12th Asia Joint Conference on Information Security (AsiaJCIS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AsiaJCIS.2017.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 12th Asia Joint Conference on Information Security (AsiaJCIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AsiaJCIS.2017.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文比较了批验证中检测无效签名的三种方法。第一种方法是随机选择测试,随机选择一半的签名进行批量验证。第二种方法是广泛使用的小指数检验。第三种方法是随机编号检验,它是矩阵检测算法的一种简化方法。随机编号测试将签名的顺序随机化,以log k+1批(k为签名个数)为周期进行验证。对每种方法进行了仿真,并对其有效性进行了分析。因此,当批量验证的签名数较大时,随机编号测试比小指数测试效率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance Analysis of Some Batch Verification Methods of Digital Signatures
In this paper, we compare three methods in detecting invalid signatures in batch verification. The first method, randomly select test, randomly chooses a half of signatures to verify in a batch. The second method is the small exponent test which is widely used. The third method, randomly numbering test, is a simplified method of the matrix-detection algorithm. The randomly numbering test randomizes the order of the signatures and verifies the signatures in log k+1 batches where k is the number of signatures. We simulate each method and analyze the efficiency of the methods. As a result, randomly numbering test is more efficient than small exponent test when the number of signatures in a batch verification is large.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improvement of Privacy Preserved Rule-Based Risk Analysis via Secure Multi-Party Computation A Lightweight Malware Classification Method Based on Detection Results of Anti-Virus Software Simulation Study of BGP Origin Validation Effect against Mis-Origination with Internet Topology An Efficient Dispersal Storage Scheme Based on Ring-LWE and NTT A Practical Experiment of the HTTP-Based RAT Detection Method in Proxy Server Logs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1