在后斯皮罗时代,欧盟处理保险索赔的关键增值税观点

Benoît Pernet, P. Gamito
{"title":"在后斯皮罗时代,欧盟处理保险索赔的关键增值税观点","authors":"Benoît Pernet, P. Gamito","doi":"10.1080/20488432.2018.1489024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT According to Article 135(1)(a) of the European VAT Directive, ‘insurance and reinsurance transactions, including related services performed by insurance brokers and insurance agents’ are exempt from VAT. In practice, this provision is far from being clear, and taxpayers in the insurance sector regularly face issues as to the proper scope of the exemption. The definition handed down by the Court largely focuses on the very nature of ‘insurance’, ‘broker’, and ‘agent,’ and leaves, regrettably, no leeway for outsourced services to benefit from the VAT exemption. This is of particular evidence for claims handling services, which are regarded by the Court as ‘back-office services’ subject to VAT when performed by third parties to the insurance contract. This article considers the CJEU's jurisprudence as regards insurance claims handling services, and the ‘literal and narrow’ approach taken by the Court as compared to a ‘market approach’ in line with economic reality. It provides a view on the implementation of the Court's ruling in Belgium and in the UK, in which different VAT treatments apply in relation to claims handling services since 1 January 2018.","PeriodicalId":114680,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of VAT/GST Law","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical VAT perspectives on the treatment of settling insurance claims in the European Union in a post-Aspiro world\",\"authors\":\"Benoît Pernet, P. Gamito\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20488432.2018.1489024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT According to Article 135(1)(a) of the European VAT Directive, ‘insurance and reinsurance transactions, including related services performed by insurance brokers and insurance agents’ are exempt from VAT. In practice, this provision is far from being clear, and taxpayers in the insurance sector regularly face issues as to the proper scope of the exemption. The definition handed down by the Court largely focuses on the very nature of ‘insurance’, ‘broker’, and ‘agent,’ and leaves, regrettably, no leeway for outsourced services to benefit from the VAT exemption. This is of particular evidence for claims handling services, which are regarded by the Court as ‘back-office services’ subject to VAT when performed by third parties to the insurance contract. This article considers the CJEU's jurisprudence as regards insurance claims handling services, and the ‘literal and narrow’ approach taken by the Court as compared to a ‘market approach’ in line with economic reality. It provides a view on the implementation of the Court's ruling in Belgium and in the UK, in which different VAT treatments apply in relation to claims handling services since 1 January 2018.\",\"PeriodicalId\":114680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of VAT/GST Law\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of VAT/GST Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20488432.2018.1489024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of VAT/GST Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20488432.2018.1489024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据欧洲增值税指令第135(1)(a)条,“保险和再保险交易,包括保险经纪人和保险代理人提供的相关服务”免征增值税。在实践中,这一规定远不明确,保险部门的纳税人经常面临豁免的适当范围问题。法院给出的定义主要集中在“保险”、“经纪人”和“代理”的本质上,遗憾的是,外包服务没有从增值税豁免中受益的余地。这对于索赔处理服务来说是一个特别的证据,当由保险合同的第三方提供时,法院将其视为需要缴纳增值税的“后台服务”。本文探讨了法院在保险理赔处理服务方面的判例,以及法院采取的“字面和狭隘”的做法,与符合经济现实的“市场做法”相比。它提供了对法院在比利时和英国的裁决的执行情况的看法,其中自2018年1月1日起,与索赔处理服务相关的不同增值税处理适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Critical VAT perspectives on the treatment of settling insurance claims in the European Union in a post-Aspiro world
ABSTRACT According to Article 135(1)(a) of the European VAT Directive, ‘insurance and reinsurance transactions, including related services performed by insurance brokers and insurance agents’ are exempt from VAT. In practice, this provision is far from being clear, and taxpayers in the insurance sector regularly face issues as to the proper scope of the exemption. The definition handed down by the Court largely focuses on the very nature of ‘insurance’, ‘broker’, and ‘agent,’ and leaves, regrettably, no leeway for outsourced services to benefit from the VAT exemption. This is of particular evidence for claims handling services, which are regarded by the Court as ‘back-office services’ subject to VAT when performed by third parties to the insurance contract. This article considers the CJEU's jurisprudence as regards insurance claims handling services, and the ‘literal and narrow’ approach taken by the Court as compared to a ‘market approach’ in line with economic reality. It provides a view on the implementation of the Court's ruling in Belgium and in the UK, in which different VAT treatments apply in relation to claims handling services since 1 January 2018.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Equality under State aid rules and VAT The direct and immediate link with specialised services contracts as a measure for the right to deduct input VAT and the uncertainty in European tax law VAT deduction and member state sovereignty: (still) a good idea? EU VAT at the dawn of the Fourth Industrial Revolution* VAT information asymmetries in the context of intra-EU trade in goods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1