通过公私伙伴关系实现全球协调:制药业的案例

Stéphanie Dagron
{"title":"通过公私伙伴关系实现全球协调:制药业的案例","authors":"Stéphanie Dagron","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1995035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The harmonization activities of the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) in the field of pharmaceutical marketing regulation perfectly illustrate the possible normative influence of non-binding instruments adopted by sub-national actors. The ICH is a hybrid organization composed of representatives of the pharmaceutical industry on one hand and the national regulation agencies of three regions on the other. An intergovernmental organization, the World Health Organization (WHO), is associated to the ICH activities through its observer status. The ICH has adopted more than 50 “technical” guidelines which have developed into global standards. It has thus become extremely difficult for national regulators to modify the criteria for drug marketing approval unilaterally. Some guidelines go beyond the standardization of technical requirements. They reflect commercial, political or ethical choices and pose complex legitimacy and accountability challenges. The analysis of the multi-level procedure and institutional framework of the ICH has so far not been conducted from a global administrative law perspective. A closer examination of the ICH process reveals a deficient structure and the need for the development of new legal standards. Some steps already taken by the ICH should be pursued further and could contribute a model for greater accountability and legitimacy for new forms of global administrative decision-making procedures.","PeriodicalId":375754,"journal":{"name":"Public International Law eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global Harmonization Through Public-Private Partnership: The Case of Pharmaceuticals\",\"authors\":\"Stéphanie Dagron\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1995035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The harmonization activities of the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) in the field of pharmaceutical marketing regulation perfectly illustrate the possible normative influence of non-binding instruments adopted by sub-national actors. The ICH is a hybrid organization composed of representatives of the pharmaceutical industry on one hand and the national regulation agencies of three regions on the other. An intergovernmental organization, the World Health Organization (WHO), is associated to the ICH activities through its observer status. The ICH has adopted more than 50 “technical” guidelines which have developed into global standards. It has thus become extremely difficult for national regulators to modify the criteria for drug marketing approval unilaterally. Some guidelines go beyond the standardization of technical requirements. They reflect commercial, political or ethical choices and pose complex legitimacy and accountability challenges. The analysis of the multi-level procedure and institutional framework of the ICH has so far not been conducted from a global administrative law perspective. A closer examination of the ICH process reveals a deficient structure and the need for the development of new legal standards. Some steps already taken by the ICH should be pursued further and could contribute a model for greater accountability and legitimacy for new forms of global administrative decision-making procedures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":375754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public International Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public International Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1995035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public International Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1995035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

国际协调会议(ICH)在药品销售监管领域的协调活动完美地说明了次国家行为体通过的非约束性文书可能产生的规范影响。ICH是一个由制药业代表和三个地区的国家监管机构组成的混合型组织。世界卫生组织(世卫组织)这一政府间组织通过其观察员地位参与了非物质遗产活动。该委员会采用了50多项“技术”指南,这些指南已发展成为全球标准。因此,国家监管机构单方面修改药品销售批准标准变得极其困难。一些准则超越了技术要求的标准化。它们反映了商业、政治或道德选择,并构成了复杂的合法性和问责挑战。迄今为止,还没有从全球行政法的角度对非物质文化遗产的多层次程序和制度框架进行分析。对非物质文化遗产程序的更仔细审查揭示了结构的缺陷和制定新的法律标准的必要性。应当进一步推行文化遗产委员会已经采取的一些步骤,这些步骤可以为新形式的全球行政决策程序提供一个更大的责任制和合法性的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Global Harmonization Through Public-Private Partnership: The Case of Pharmaceuticals
The harmonization activities of the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) in the field of pharmaceutical marketing regulation perfectly illustrate the possible normative influence of non-binding instruments adopted by sub-national actors. The ICH is a hybrid organization composed of representatives of the pharmaceutical industry on one hand and the national regulation agencies of three regions on the other. An intergovernmental organization, the World Health Organization (WHO), is associated to the ICH activities through its observer status. The ICH has adopted more than 50 “technical” guidelines which have developed into global standards. It has thus become extremely difficult for national regulators to modify the criteria for drug marketing approval unilaterally. Some guidelines go beyond the standardization of technical requirements. They reflect commercial, political or ethical choices and pose complex legitimacy and accountability challenges. The analysis of the multi-level procedure and institutional framework of the ICH has so far not been conducted from a global administrative law perspective. A closer examination of the ICH process reveals a deficient structure and the need for the development of new legal standards. Some steps already taken by the ICH should be pursued further and could contribute a model for greater accountability and legitimacy for new forms of global administrative decision-making procedures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Dual‐Nature Thesis: Which Dualism? Legality and the Legal Relation Soldiers as Public Officials: A Moral Justification for Combatant Immunity A Pragmatic Reconstruction of Law's Claim to Authority Ownership, Use, and Exclusivity: The Kantian Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1