拜占庭弹性分布式哈希表的完全分布式可扩展对等协议

John E. Augustine, Soumyottam Chatterjee, Gopal Pandurangan
{"title":"拜占庭弹性分布式哈希表的完全分布式可扩展对等协议","authors":"John E. Augustine, Soumyottam Chatterjee, Gopal Pandurangan","doi":"10.1145/3490148.3538588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Performing computation in the presence of faulty and malicious nodes is a central problem in distributed computing. Over 35 years ago, Dwork, Peleg, Pippenger, and Upfal [STOC 1986, SICOMP 1988] studied the fundamental Byzantine agreement problem in sparse, bounded degree networks and presented the first protocol that achieved almost-everywhere agreement among good nodes. However, this protocol and several subsequent protocols including that of King, Saia, Sanwalani, and Vee [FOCS 2006] had the drawback that they were not fully-distributed - in those protocols, nodes are required to have initial knowledge of the entire network topology. This drawback makes such protocols not applicable to real-world communication networks such as peer-to-peer (P2P) networks, which are typically sparse and bounded degree and where nodes initially have only local knowledge of themselves and of their neighbors.","PeriodicalId":112865,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 34th ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Fully-Distributed Scalable Peer-to-Peer Protocol for Byzantine-Resilient Distributed Hash Tables\",\"authors\":\"John E. Augustine, Soumyottam Chatterjee, Gopal Pandurangan\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3490148.3538588\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Performing computation in the presence of faulty and malicious nodes is a central problem in distributed computing. Over 35 years ago, Dwork, Peleg, Pippenger, and Upfal [STOC 1986, SICOMP 1988] studied the fundamental Byzantine agreement problem in sparse, bounded degree networks and presented the first protocol that achieved almost-everywhere agreement among good nodes. However, this protocol and several subsequent protocols including that of King, Saia, Sanwalani, and Vee [FOCS 2006] had the drawback that they were not fully-distributed - in those protocols, nodes are required to have initial knowledge of the entire network topology. This drawback makes such protocols not applicable to real-world communication networks such as peer-to-peer (P2P) networks, which are typically sparse and bounded degree and where nodes initially have only local knowledge of themselves and of their neighbors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":112865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 34th ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 34th ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3490148.3538588\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 34th ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3490148.3538588","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在存在故障和恶意节点的情况下进行计算是分布式计算中的一个核心问题。35年前,Dwork, Peleg, Pippenger和Upfal [STOC 1986, SICOMP 1988]研究了稀疏有界度网络中的基本拜占庭协议问题,并提出了第一个在好节点之间几乎处处达成一致的协议。然而,这个协议和后来的几个协议,包括King、Saia、Sanwalani和Vee [FOCS 2006]的协议,都有一个缺点,那就是它们不是完全分布式的——在这些协议中,节点需要对整个网络拓扑结构有初步的了解。这个缺点使得这种协议不适用于现实世界的通信网络,比如点对点(P2P)网络,P2P网络通常是稀疏的、有界度的,节点最初只有自己和邻居的局部知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Fully-Distributed Scalable Peer-to-Peer Protocol for Byzantine-Resilient Distributed Hash Tables
Performing computation in the presence of faulty and malicious nodes is a central problem in distributed computing. Over 35 years ago, Dwork, Peleg, Pippenger, and Upfal [STOC 1986, SICOMP 1988] studied the fundamental Byzantine agreement problem in sparse, bounded degree networks and presented the first protocol that achieved almost-everywhere agreement among good nodes. However, this protocol and several subsequent protocols including that of King, Saia, Sanwalani, and Vee [FOCS 2006] had the drawback that they were not fully-distributed - in those protocols, nodes are required to have initial knowledge of the entire network topology. This drawback makes such protocols not applicable to real-world communication networks such as peer-to-peer (P2P) networks, which are typically sparse and bounded degree and where nodes initially have only local knowledge of themselves and of their neighbors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Parallel Shortest Paths with Negative Edge Weights Automatic HBM Management: Models and Algorithms Parallel Batch-Dynamic Algorithms for k-Core Decomposition and Related Graph Problems Parallel Cover Trees and their Applications Brief Announcement: The (Limited) Power of Multiple Identities: Asynchronous Byzantine Reliable Broadcast with Improved Resilience through Collusion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1